Trial Information

Official Title: Comparison of a MAGNET Protocol Versus "off-on" Protocol for Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators Undergoing Procedures Requiring Electrocautery

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the two options for management of ICDs (internal cardioverter defibrillators) in patients undergoing procedures with electrocautery: (1) programming ICD therapies "off," or (2) use of a magnet to suspend ICD therapies By comparing these two techniques the investigators hope to demonstrate the efficiency of using an ICD magnet protocol during perioperative management of patients undergoing electrocautery procedures. Secondary purposes are to gain further information on health care resources, incidence of EMI, handoff communications and to document lack of adverse events in either group. Primary objective will be: ICD therapy "off times" will be less with the use of a magnet protocol compared to an "off-on" protocol. Secondary objectives will be: (1) Healthcare resources (time and costs of skilled personnel) will be less using a magnet protocol compared to an off-on protocol, and (2) there will be no difference between adverse events in the magnet protocol compared to an off-on protocol. The incidence of EMI and number of handoff communications will be documented. The investigators hypothesis is that the number of minutes with ICD therapies "off" will be significantly less with magnet use. The investigators also expect health care resources to be less with magnet use compared to reprogramming.

Phase: N/A

Sponsor: Midwest Heart Foundation

Overall Contacts:

Janet Gifford, MSN, APN
630-527-3530
jgifford@edward.org

Karen Larimer, PhD, ACNP
Phone: 773-612-6205
karen.larimer@advocatehealth.com