A-1090, Austria

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 2 Doses of EYE103 Compared With Ranibizumab (0.5 mg) in Participants With DME

EYE-RES-102 is a randomized, double masked pivotal study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 dose levels of EYE103 in comparison with the active control, ranibizumab, in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) Approximately 960 participants will be entered in the study. Participants will be randomized 1:1:1 to receive low dose EYE103, high dose EYE103, or 0.5 mg ranibizumab, administered via intravitreal injection. In the first year, all 3 treatment groups will be treated every 4 weeks with either EYE103 or ranibizumab. Beginning at Year 2, the frequency of treatment for participants will shift based on a personalized treatment interval (PTI) algorithm. Throughout the 2-year study, subjects will be evaluated every 4 weeks, including measurement of ETDRS BCVA, examination by slit-lamp biomicroscopy, fundoscopy, and SD-OCT. Among other parameters, SD-OCT will be used to measure central subfield thickness (CST) in microns.

Mycobacteria Registry Study: Prospective Observational Study in Austria

Personalized Targeted Glioblastoma Therapies by ex Vivo Drug Screening

Patient derived cell line (PDC) -based drug screening will be applied to formulate a personalized treatment approach. Patients will be randomized between the investigational group receiving in addition to standard histology analysis also the PDC-based drug screening and the standard group receiving only standard histology analysis. Outcome results will be compared in a randomized, interventional clinical performance study. The PDC-based drug screening will be performed only in accordance with the approved Performance Study Plan on subjects who have signed an informed consent form.

Ocular Perfusion in Patients With Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a neuroophthalmological disease, characterized by an increased intracranial pressure (ICP) without an identifiable causative factor. If not properly treated and carefully monitored the disease can even lead to irreversible severe or complete loss of vision or severe irreversible visual field defects, respectively. Given this clinical urgency, precise diagnostic tools become essential for timely decision making. Laser Speckle Flowgraphy (LSFG) is a non-invasive, in-vivo imaging method, which quantitatively estimates blood flow in the optic nerve head, the choroid, the retina and the iris. LSFG has a low procedural complexity, obtains precise and reproducible measurements and is therefore suitable to assess ocular perfusion. The proposed study aims to evaluate optic nerve head blood flow and microcirculation in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. For this purpose, optic nerve head blood flow will be examined in patients with IIH before and after therapy and additionally compared with healthy age- and sex-matched control subjects. In addition, other parameters will be measured, in particular retinal blood flow, retinal oxygen saturation and retinal neurovascular coupling.

Balance, Autonomic Response, and Sensory Modulation to Dosage of Mechanical Vagal Stimulation in Healthy Adults

mechanical VNs in humans, induced by a combination of non-painful physiological neck movements, effectively reduces the HR at rest in humans, without any side effects in the short- and long-term. Indeed, HR reduction is a proxy for the VN increased activity among healthy subjects and patients with systemic diseases or autonomic diseases. Mechanical VNs had been successfully adopted in two clinical trials among chronic pain patients (NCT05345496, NCT05360589), but due to the early stage of these new VNs and the clear advantages of this method, studies refining the stimulation protocol are suitable. Thus, the study aims to investigate the possible dose-dependent effects of mVNs on different physiological parameters in humans. 3 protocols of mVNs will be compared consisting of (1) 4 minutes (2 minutes on each side); (2) 12 minutes (3 sessions of 2 minutes of stimulation, with 2 minutes of rest for each side); (3) 16 minutes (8 minutes on each side). The following outcomes will be assessed before and after the stimulation: HR at rest, HRV, balance on standing, perceived intensity and modulation of mechanical stimuli on the skin of the forehead, and the abdomen, gastrointestinal transit, and a fecal sample from the closest intestinal emptying. A total sample of at least 96 healthy subjects (48 females) aged between 18 and 60 are expected to participate. The bidirectional communication between internal organs and the brain via the VN is a well-established scientific fact. Indeed, VNs has beneficial effects on manifold pathological conditions in humans. However, easy-to-apply, non-invasive, and effective VNs methods and standardized protocols are lacking. The here proposed project aims at refining and critically assessing mVNs methods - a prerequisite for exploring the clinical utility of mVNs and fostering its therapeutic potential given the fundamental role of the VN in regulating health and disease. Results obtained from this project will provide data on mVNs on gut microbiota dynamics and the potential benefits for pain modulation, equilibrium impairments, and gastrointestinal dysfunctions.

Supporting Tools and Cognitive Aids for BLS

Hemodynamic Monitoring and Fluid Responsiveness in Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA ECMO) - "HemodynamECMOnitoring-VA Study"

Hemodynamic monitoring and tests for fluid responsiveness are cornerstones of intensive care medicine. Generally, hemodynamic measurements can be obtained, for instance, with the following methods: pulmonary artery catheter, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), esophageal doppler, transpulmonary thermodilution, pulse contour analysis and bioreactance, amongst others. Maneuvers for assessing volume responsiveness include passive leg raising (PLR), respiratory pulse pressure variation (PPV), stroke volume variation (SVV), inferior vena cava ultrasound (IVC), and end-inspiratory or end-expiratory occlusion tests. While these commonly used methods of hemodynamic assessment have been validated in various clinical scenarios, data are lacking in the setting of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO). VA ECMO is commonly used for circulatory support in patients with severe hemodynamic failure or cardiac arrest. Blood is most commonly drained from a femoral vein, pumped through an oxygenator, where it is oxygenated and decarboxylated, and thereafter reinfused into the patient via an arterial, most commonly femoral, return cannula. Theoretically, the artificial circulation with its blood drainage and return flows may interfere with common hemodynamic monitoring techniques and lead to erroneous measurements. The aim of this study therefore is to validate select techniques of hemodynamic monitoring and assessment of fluid responsiveness in patients on VA ECMO. In the context of this study, the performance of different hemodynamic monitoring tools and techniques for predicting fluid responsiveness will be compared.

Hemodynamic Monitoring and Fluid Responsiveness in Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV ECMO) - "HemodynamECMOnitoring-VV Study"

Hemodynamic monitoring and tests for fluid responsiveness are cornerstones of intensive care medicine. Generally, hemodynamic measurements can be obtained, for instance, with the following methods: pulmonary artery catheter, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), esophageal doppler, transpulmonary thermodilution, pulse contour analysis and bioreactance, amongst others. Maneuvers for assessing volume responsiveness include passive leg raising (PLR), respiratory pulse pressure variation (PPV), stroke volume variation (SVV), inferior vena cava ultrasound (IVC), and end-inspiratory or end-expiratory occlusion tests. While these commonly used methods of hemodynamic assessment have been validated in various clinical scenarios, data are lacking in the setting of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO). VV ECMO is commonly used for respiratory support in patients with severe acute respiratory failure. Blood is usually drained from a femoral vein, pumped through an oxygenator, where it is oxygenated and decarboxylated, and thereafter reinfused into the patient via a central venous, most commonly jugular, return cannula. Theoretically, the artificial circulation with its blood drainage and return flows may interfere with common hemodynamic monitoring techniques and lead to erroneous measurements. The aim of this study therefore is to validate select techniques of hemodynamic monitoring and assessment of fluid responsiveness in patients on VV ECMO. In the context of this study, the performance of different hemodynamic monitoring tools and techniques for predicting fluid responsiveness will be compared.