Imeldalaan 9, Belgium

Observational Study, to Assess Treatment Retention of an Adalimumab Biosimilar (Hyrimoz®) in IBD Patients in Real Life Setting

The main purpose of this non-interventional study is to assess patient retention with Hyrimoz® treatment up to 6 months after treatment initiation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) patients. Primary data will be collected at each data collection time point (visits will be according to local clinical practice). Data will be collected based on the information reported in the medical records. This study does not impose a therapy protocol, procedure or change in routine medical practice. Apart from self-administered questionnaires, no additional examinations or assessments are required, consequently there are no additional medical risks for the patients. The total duration of the study will be 36 months (3 years). The recruitment period will be for 2 years with individual patient follow-up for up to 1 year. It is expected that patients will visit their physicians at regular intervals depending on local specific clinical practices. Four time points for data collection will be defined: - T0 (patient inclusion in the study and Baseline characteristics). - T1 (3-month follow-up ± 1 month). - T2 (6-month follow-up and primary criteria -2/+3 months). - T3 (12-month follow-up -3/+2 months).

Clinical Assessment - HominisTM Surgical System

Observational Real-life Study of Cabozantinib in Monotherapy or in Combination With Nivolumab in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC)

ANEUFIX for Endoleak Type II Repair

The investigational device is called ANEUFIX, which is a product treating the endoleak by blockage of backflowing blood vessels, i.e. by filling the endoleak void and nidus of feeding artery and exit of existing draining arteries. ANEUFIX is a polymer that cures rapidly (2-4 min at 37°C) after injection into the AAA-sac close to the nidus.

Testing the Value of Novel Strategy and Its Cost Efficacy in Order to Improve the Poor Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock

The EURO SHOCK trial tests the novel use of early deployment of mechanical support device in Cardiogenic Shock (CGS) in a randomised, strategy trial, with evidence of benefit or otherwise measured by recording hard clinical end-point outcomes. Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is already used in CGS. This is therefore not a novel therapy. It is the use of ECMO early in the development of CGS that is the novel aspect of this project. The Investigators will test whether a strategy of very early ECMO can ameliorate the rapid decline that many CGS patients suffer. The value of deploying a clinically used and approved device prospectively and early in the natural history of CGS compared to standard practice has not been tested before and will be the basis of the EURO SHOCK project. This trial itself will be a prospective randomized, open label, design study that will compare two groups of patients: Both will receive appropriate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as is current practice as they arrive at the hospital. 1. Group 1 will receive immediate PCI + standard care (pharmacological support). 2. Group 2 will receive immediate PCI plus support with early peripheral veno-arterial ECMO + standard care (pharmacological support). The Investigators will also compare the cost-effectiveness of early VA-ECMO, as compared to current standard of care. EURO SHOCK will also evaluate novel CMR protocols in these unwell patients, and also whether systems of urgent flagged transfer of the unwell patient is practical and beneficial. The Investigators will determine whether there are biological and ECG markers that predict worse patient outcomes, which could thus help select most appropriate patients for expedited treatments (the patient is only transferred if needed). Although at the centre of the project there is a randomised trial, other important objectives will therefore be delivered. The research study will additionally focus, through a-priori, post-hoc analyses, on higher risk and vulnerable sub groups such as the elderly (>75 years) and females, the importance of site of infarct and on those with multi-morbidities such as diabetes. These post-hoc data will be published separately. The trial will include patients with out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) who have documented return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) but with certain caveats (see exclusion criteria). The primary outcome is the all-cause mortality at 30 days following admission with acute coronary syndrome with cardiogenic shock. Key secondary outcomes will include all- cause mortality or admission with heart failure at 12 months, all-cause mortality at 12 months and admission to hospital with heart failure at 12 months. A cornerstone of this research programme will be to determine the cost-efficacy of ECMO in this setting. Cost benefit will be measured both immediately and in the longer term testing for example any impact of need for heart failure therapies. This will be undertaken with evaluations of the cost-effectiveness of the device and evaluation of quality of life using the EuroQuol-5D-5L and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. The EUROSHOCK trial will also include the following sub-studies: 1. Cardiovascular MRI: Cardio-Renal Imaging Sub-study using novel shortened, non-breath-holding protocols. 2. Platelet Function Sub-study designed to access the impact of novel ECMO coatings on platelet activation. The programme will be developed and run through a carefully thought through management structure comprising 8 separate but interlinked work programmes (each targeted at one aspect of the project and headed by an experienced clinical trialist or trial manager) and involve the dissemination of results through a designated dissemination work package. Attention to translating the results to subsequent on-the-ground patient care will be an important aim for the management and dissemination team, and will involve patient support groups, professional societies and information delivered directly to the medical and non- medical staff caring for CGS patients.

Efficacy of a Right-sided Ablation of the Anterior Ganglionated Plexus for Neurally Mediated Syncope

The efficacy of therapeutic strategies mentioned in the guidelines for patients with neurally mediated syncope (NMS) is limited. The first clinical study on cardiac denervation in humans was published in 2005. Derived from this first method, different approaches to cardioneuroablation (CNA) to treat NMS have been published. Such ablations are complex, bi-atrial, and extensive. Cardio-neuromodulation (CardNM) is a less extensive and right-sided approach to CNA, based on a tailored vagolysis of the sinoatrial node through partial ablation of the anterior right-ganglionated plexus. Evidence from a single-center, non-randomized, unblinded trial showed that CardNM was associated with a reduction in syncope burden exceeding 90%. This third study on CardNM (CardNMH3 study) is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial with a sham control group investigating the efficacy and safety of a computed tomography (CT)-guided, right-sided ablation of the anterior ganglionated plexus to prevent recurrence of syncope in patients with neurally mediated syncope. The primary goal of the study is to determine whether a CT-guided, right-sided ablation of the anterior ganglionated plexus safely reduces the risk of recurrent episodes of syncope in patients with a history of recurrent NMS. Two-thirds of the patients will be randomized to the active arm and one-third to the control arm (sham). In all patients, the endocardial site to potentially target during ablation will be annotated before the procedure by a target line (TL) on a computed tomographic image of the heart imported into the CARTO system (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA), as detailed in the 'intervention description'. The study procedure will be performed under general anesthesia according to a standardized protocol. In all patients, a diagnostic electrophysiology study (EPS) and electroanatomical mapping of the right atrium and the surrounding veins will be performed first. This image will be merged with the CT image and the TL will be visible. Randomization will be performed electronically at this stage of the procedure. In patients assigned to the active arm, the TL will be targeted by ablation as detailed in the intervention description'. The ablation procedure is considered complete when one of the following conditions is fulfilled: 1. 10 radiofrequency applications have been delivered; 2. After 5 radiofrequency applications, the P-P interval is <70% of the baseline procedural P-P interval and remains >550 ms 5 min after the last radiofrequency application; 3. ≥5 radiofrequency applications have been delivered and the operator estimates that no additional P-P interval shortening will be obtained by additional radiofrequency applications; 4. 3 radiofrequency applications have been delivered and the P-P interval is <550 ms after the last radiofrequency application and remains stable after 5 min of waiting. In all patients, a pharmacological evaluation and new diagnostic EPS will be performed to further evaluate the sinus node and atrioventricular nodal intrinsic activity at the end of the procedure, either after the diagnostic part of the procedure in the sham group or after the ablation in the active arm. Syncope burden, syncope occurrence and quality of life will be assessed by questionnaires completed at baseline and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. A 24-h rhythm registration will be performed at baseline and at 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-up to investigate the influence of the intervention on heart rate. The effect of CardNM on blood pressure and on chronotropic sinus node function will be evaluated in 2 additional substudies. Patients enrolled in the blood-pressure substudy will undergo a 24-h blood pressure monitoring at baseline and at 1, 3 and 6 months. Participants in the sinus node competence substudy will undergo a bicycle exercise test at baseline and at 1, 3 and 6 months. Investigators aim to achieve complete follow-up for 110 patients who meet the study enrollment criteria. If the syncope-free survival, the primary endpoint of the study, is significantly different between the 2 arms after the enrollment of fewer than 110 patients (minimum 55 patients), enrollment into the trial will be prematurely stopped. The study may also be terminated prematurely if safety concerns occur.

Predictors of Work Resumption After Back Surgery

Background | Over the past decade, the number of back surgeries in Belgium has substantially increased. However, even after an anatomically successful surgery, 10% to 40% of the patients continue to report pain complaints, causing personal suffering and an enormous economic burden. The specific factors that can predict individual trajectories in postoperative pain, recovery, and work resumption are currently largely unknown. Aim | The aim of this study is to identify modifiable predictors of work resumption after back surgery. Methods | In this multisite, prospective, longitudinal study, 300 individuals undergoing back surgery will be followed one-year post-surgery. Prior to surgery, the participants will perform a behavioral computer task to assess fear of movement-related pain and avoidance behavior, and their generalization. In addition, participants will complete questionnaires to assess preoperative fear of movement-related pain, avoidance behavior, optimism, expectancies towards recovery and work resumption, and the duration and severity of the pain before the surgery. Immediately after surgery, as well as six weeks, three months, six months, and twelve months postoperatively, sustainable work resumption, pain severity, disability, and quality of life will be assessed. Hypothesis | The primary hypothesis is that generalization of fear of movement-related pain and avoidance behavior will negatively affect sustainable work resumption after back surgery. Second, the investigators hypothesize that generalization of fear of movement-related pain and avoidance behavior, negative expectancies towards recovery and work resumption, longer pain duration, and more severe pain before the surgery will negatively affect work resumption, pain severity, disability, and quality of life after back surgery. In contrast, positive expectancies towards recovery and work resumption and optimism are expected positively influence work resumption, pain severity, disability, and quality of life.

Ketamine in Acute Brain Injury Patients.

In this study the effects of ketamine as an adjunct to an standard sedation regime in adult TBI patients will be investigated on the therapy intensity level and intracranial pressure. All patients will receive propofol for sedation to control ICP, to a maximum dose of 4 mg/kg/h. If the ICP is not controlled at the maximum dose of propofol, midazolam will be added, to a maximum dose of 0.3 mg/kg/h, as part of the current standard of care in the Participating Sites. All patients will receive remifentanil, fentanyl or sufentanil infusions for pain relief. The study medication (ketamine or placebo) will be started after randomization. As part of the current standard of care in the Participating Sites, the decision for decompressive craniectomy and/or barbiturate coma will be taken after multidisciplinary consultation between the treating intensivist and neurosurgeon. The decision to stop or reduce sedation, lies with the treating physician, based on the level of ICP control, the absence of clinical or radiological signs of deterioration of the neurologic state. In the case of barbiturate coma, the study drug will be discontinued. During and following decompressive craniectomy, the sedative regime (propofol/midazolam/study drug/ opioids) will be continued. In case of suspected or threatening Propofol-Related Infusion syndrome, propofol will be stopped and switched to midazolam. In case of hypertriglyceridemia >200 mg/dL, propofol will be reduced and if necessary, midazolam will be associated to allow control of sedation. During surgical procedures related to the traumatic brain injury or not, the study drug will not be discontinued. The use of open label administration of ketamine is not allowed during the course of the trial, i.e until hospital discharge.

Glucose Homeostasis, Metabolomics and Pregnancy Outcomes After Bariatric Surgery

The GLORIA study is a Belgian multicenter prospective cohort study. The investigators aim to recruit 95 pregnant women after bariatric surgery (gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy) and as a control group, an age and BMI-matched cohort of 95 pregnant women without bariatric surgery. Participants will be recruited before 12 weeks of pregnancy. To evaluate glucose homeostasis, a masked CGM will be used for 10 days during each trimester in pregnancy and at the time of screening for GDM (at 24-28 weeks). The primary outcome is the mean glycaemia levels and glycaemic variability (SD) measured by CGM in pregnancy. At the different time points, anthropometric measurements (including body composition), food diary, questionnaires and micronutrients will be evaluated. In addition, in collaboration with the lab of Cristina Legido Quigle from the Steno Diabetes Center in Copenhagen, metabolomics will be analyzed. Women with a history of bariatric surgery will receive screening for GDM between 24-28 weeks of pregnancy by performing self- monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) with a glucometer during one week. In addition to SMBG, women will receive a masked CGM during one week.

The PIONEER-IV Study is Comparing Clinical Outcomes Between Angiography-derived Physiology Guidance to Usual Care in an All-comers PCI Population With Unrestrictive Use of the HT Supreme Sirolimus-eluting Stent