Lens-saint-remy, Belgium

DOSAGE Study: Upfront Dose-Reduced Chemotherapy in Older Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Treating older adults with chemotherapy remains a challenge, as they are strongly underrepresented in clinical trials and no robust guidelines for treating older patients exist. Moreover, older adults are at increased risk of chemotherapy-related toxicity, resulting in decreased quality of life (QoL), increased hospital admissions and high health care costs. Therefore, the aim of the DOSAGE study is to demonstrate that upfront dose-reduced chemotherapy in patients with metastasized colorectal cancer is non-inferior to full-dose treatment with regard to progression-free survival (PFS). Treatment plans (monotherapy or doublet chemotherapy) will be based on expected risk of treatment toxicity for the individual patient (according to the Geriatric 8 (G8) questionnaire). The investigators expect that this treatment strategy will lead to less grade ≥3 toxicity, less early treatment continuation and hospitalizations and a better QoL and physical functioning. The DOSAGE study is a phase III, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized controlled clinical trial in patients aged ≥70 years with metastasized colorectal cancer eligible for palliative chemotherapy. All participating patients will undergo geriatric screening by the G8 questionnaire and will be classified as "low risk of toxicity" (G8-score of 15 or higher) or "high risk of toxicity" (G8-score of 14 or lower or judged as "high toxicity risk" by their treating oncologist). Patients classified as low risk will be randomized between a fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin in either full-dose, or with an upfront dose-reduction of 25%. Patients classified as high risk will be randomized between fluoropyrimidine monotherapy in either full-dose or upfront dose-reduction. Addition of targeted treatment (bevacizumab or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition) is allowed. Patients with a moderate renal impairment (GFR 30- 50 mL/min) will be treated with 25% reduced starting dose of capecitabine when randomized for full dose treatment and treated with 40% reduced starting dose when randomized for upfront dose reduction. Primary outcome is PFS. Secondary endpoints include grade ≥3 toxicity, QoL, physical functioning, overall survival, number of treatment cycles, dose reductions, hospital admissions, cumulative received dosage and cost-effectiveness. Given a non-inferiority margin of 8 weeks, 587 patients will be included (293/292 patients per arm).

Retrospective Study of Airway Management in Dutch ED's

Endotracheal intubation can be a lifesaving intervention for critically ill patients in the emergency department (ED). Endotracheal intubation is, however, a high-risk procedure with many potential complications, which seem to be even more prevalent when carried out in the ED compared to for example the operating theater. This is possibly due to multiple reasons such as a sicker population, non-elective setting, a higher variability among indications for intubation or competence of providers. Internationally, large registries were established and multiple observational studies have been performed to gain more information about the methods, safety and complications of intubations in the ED. While in recent years these studies have added to our knowledge of ED airway management, there is still a lack of high-quality studies and there is a strong argument for increased research. To date, no studies have been published of airway management in Dutch EDs. The investigators therefore have no knowledge about any factors possibly influencing intubation outcomes and complications nor comparability with international data. Among these are factors that have been associated with preventable harm and death and insight into these factors could be used for improvement of the safety of airway management in Dutch EDs. This study is therefore intended to provide a comprehensive review of the clinical practice and characteristics of endotracheal intubations within Dutch EDs. The results could potentially be used for comparative analysis against global datasets. Additionally, the insights gained from this study will shed light on existing gaps prevalent in the current registration processes of intubations in the Netherlands. Furthermore, these insights could act as a stepping stone for future investigations that can lead to a deeper understanding of the methodologies, safety protocols, and associated complications of endotracheal intubations within Dutch EDs

Implementation of Home Monitoring in Patients with Pulmonary Fibrosis

Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either hospital-based care or a home monitoring program integrated into hospital-based care. Hospital-based care involves outpatient clinic visits every three months including lung function testing. Home monitoring involves weekly measurements of both physiological- and patient reported outcomes (PROs) in a mobile health care application with half of the outpatient clinic visits alternately being replaced by remote video consultations. The home monitoring program includes home spirometry, pulse-oximetry, PROs, video consultations, a medication coach, and an infotheque showing disease-specific information. Questionnaires will be filled out by both study groups at set time points. The total study duration for individual patients will be 12 months.

Rifampicin Combination Therapy Versus Monotherapy for Staphylococcal Prosthetic Joint Infection

This is a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized controlled open label trial with a non-inferiority design, comparing the efficacy of rifampicin-based combination antimicrobial therapy versus antimicrobial monotherapy with clindamycin during the oral treatment phase of prosthetic joint infection caused by Staphylococcus spp. The total duration of follow-up will be 15 months from the initial DAIR. All adult patients, aged 18 years or older, diagnosed and hospitalized with hip- or knee PJI caused by Staphylococcus spp and treated by the DAIR strategy (see Interventions), are eligible for inclusion. The diagnosis of PJI is defined according to the EBJIS 2021 criteria. Exclusion criteria are a contra-indication for rifampicin (due to a resistant strain, a proven allergic reaction, difficult drug-drug-interactions or other contra-indications as listed in the SmPC's of the antibiotics), a contra-indication for levofloxacin and clindamycin and cotrimoxazole and tetracyclines (due to a resistant strain, a proven allergic reaction, difficult drug-drug-interactions or other contra-indications as listed in the SmPC's of the antibiotics), (iii)complicated S. aureus bacteremia or concurrent endocarditis requiring long-term iv antibiotic treatment > 3 weeks , (iv) an infection for which there are no suitable antibiotic choices to permit randomization between the two arms of the trial (for instance, where organisms are only sensitive to intravenous antibiotics), (v) treatment failure before the start of oral therapy, (vi) more than two separate surgical debridements , (vii)an unsatisfactory response to initial treatment leading to continuation of intravenous therapy beyond day 21, (viii) patients with an expected life expectancy <12 months, (ix) patients with a tumor prosthesis , (x) patients receiving chemotherapy for active malignancy in the next 12 months, (xi) patients who are scheduled in advance for chronic suppressive antibiotic therapy after the initial 12 weeks of antibiotic treatment, (xii) The patient is unlikely to comply with trial requirements following randomization in the opinion of the investigator, (xiii) Pregnancy or breastfeeding, (xiv) Patients who are not able to read or communicate in Dutch or English will be excluded from participating in this study. The main trial endpoint is treatment success 15 months after DAIR (=1 year after finishing antibiotic treatment). Treatment success will be defined as absence of all of the following: (I) Infection related re-surgery of the initially affected prosthetic joint (II) New antibiotic treatment for suspected or proven infection of the index joint. (III) Ongoing use of antibiotics for the index joint at the end of follow-up. (IV) Death Secondary outcomes are (a) Quality of life, measured with the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires. The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized and validated measure of health status developed by the EuroQol Group to provide a comprehensive generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. This 'quality of life' questionnaire will be scored at the time of randomization, at week 6 after the initial surgical debridement and after 3 months. (b) Adverse events. The number of SAEs during antimicrobial treatment and follow up ii. The number of switches to a different oral regimen, iii. The number of antibiotic associated AEs (classified by the modified Hartwig and Siegel scale). (c) The number of patients developing Clostridioides difficile infection during treatment. (d) The occurrence of rifampicin resistance in bacteria in patients with a microbiologically confirmed failure of treatment.

A Study to Investigate the Effect of Lepodisiran on the Reduction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Adults With Elevated Lipoprotein(a) - ACCLAIM-Lp(a)

The Effect of Retatrutide Once Weekly on Cardiovascular Outcomes and Kidney Outcomes in Adults Living With Obesity (TRIUMPH-Outcomes)

The Effect of exeRcise And Diet on Quality of Life in Patients With Incurable Cancer of Esophagus and Stomach (RADICES)

Randomization will be stratified based on: duration of first line therapy (shorter or longer than 6 months), WHO performance status (0, 1 versus 2), (intended) start of second-line (or further) systemic therapy for progressive disease (yes versus no) and time since failure of first line therapy (shorter or longer than 3 months ago). Due to the nature of the intervention, it is not possible to blind the patients, the local study nurses, or the investigators to the treatment assignment.

Preoperative Optimisation of Modifiable Risk Factors in Surgery of the Pancreas

Background In the past, little attention has been given in the daily practice to the patient's condition before an operation. Recent studies have shown the benefit of preoperative optimisation programs. However, these studies consisted only of smaller studies and were mainly performed in patients who underwent colorectal surgery. Although promising, unfortunately, strong evidence to support the contribution of prehabilitation to optimize the functional outcome after surgery is still lacking and consequently it is not included in the Dutch basic health insurance package. Objective To investigate whether implementation of a best practice program for preoperative optimisation of patients with a focus on screening, assessment, and intervention of 8 potentially (partly) modifiable risk factors (low (aerobic) fitness level, malnutrition, low psychological resilience, comorbidities (iron deficiency (anaemia), impaired glucose control and frailty), and intoxications (alcohol and smoking behaviour)) will improve the time to functional recovery. Study design A nationwide stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial. In this design all participating centres will cross over from current practice to the best practice program, in a randomised order. At the end of the study, all centres will have implemented the best practice program. Study population 13 centres performing major pancreatic surgery in the Netherlands collaborating within the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (DPCG). Intervention Preoperative screening of all patients scheduled for pancreatic resection on (aerobic) fitness level, malnutrition risk, psychological resilience, haemoglobin, iron and HbA1c concentration, frailty, and alcohol and smoking behaviour. All patients are provided with a patient-tailored, multimodal prehabilitation program, in which these potentially (partly) modifiable factors are preoperatively addressed. This program is based on findings in previous screening and prehabilitation programs, a national inventory of current preoperative care protocols and expert opinion. Consensus upon this program was reached with pancreatic surgeons from all centres of the DPCG. The final program was critically reviewed by the advisory committee of internationally respected experts in the field of prehabilitation and pancreatology. Comparison Preoperative care according to current practice.

Observational Dutch Young Symptomatic StrokE studY - nEXT

Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of Group Schema Therapy for Complex Eating Disorders: the GST-EAT Study