Comparing Combinations of Drugs to Treat Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) When a Stem Cell Transplant is Not a Medically Suitable Treatment
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare progression-free survival (PFS) in frail or selected intermediate fit newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) participants treated with bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone at reduced dosing (VRd-Lite) induction followed by lenalidomide maintenance (Arm 1) versus daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) induction followed by lenalidomide maintenance (Arm 2). II. To compare overall survival (OS) in frail or selected intermediate fit NDMM participants treated with VRd-Lite induction followed by lenalidomide maintenance (Arm 1) versus DRd induction followed by lenalidomide and daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj maintenance (Arm 3). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare PFS in Arm 1 versus Arm 3 II. To compare OS in Arm 1 versus Arm 2. III. To compare PFS in Arm 2 versus 3. IV. To compare the overall response rate (ORR) of Arm 1 against the ORR of Arm 2 and Arm 3. V. To compare the safety of Arm 1 with the safety of Arm 2 and Arm 3. VI. To explore veinous thrombo-embolism (VTE) incidence in participants receiving lenalidomide during induction across the three study arms. VII. To describe median time to response (complete response [CR] or better per International Myeloma Working Group [IMWG] criteria, very good partial response [VGPR] or better per IMWG criteria, partial response [PR] or better per IMWG criteria) on the three study arms. PRIMARY QUALITY OF LIFE (QOL) OBJECTIVE: I. To compare patient-reported global health status between treatment arms (Arm 1 versus the combination of Arms 2 and 3) at 9 months after randomization (end of induction therapy) using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). SECONDARY QOL OBJECTIVE: II. To compare longitudinal changes in global health status between treatment arms (Arm 1 versus the combination of Arms 2 and 3) from baseline to 9 months after randomization (end of induction therapy). PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES-COMMON TERMINOLOGY CRITERIA FOR ADVERSE EVENTS (PRO-CTCAE) OBJECTIVE: I. To compare selected patient-reported outcome symptoms using PRO-CTCAE items among the 3 study arms. ADDITIONAL OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the rate of minimal residual disease (MRD) by clonoSEQ after 9 cycles of induction in Arm 1 versus Arm 2 and Arm 3, respectively. II. To compare the rate of MRD conversion after 1 year of maintenance in participants who were MRD positive after induction in Arm 1 versus Arm 2 and Arm 3, respectively. III. To compare the rate of sustained MRD negativity at time points of post-induction, post-1 year maintenance in Arm 1 versus Arm 2 and Arm 3, respectively. BANKING OBJECTIVES: I. To bank specimens for future correlative studies. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 arms. ARM I (VRd-Lite): INDUCTION CYCLES 1-9: Patients receive bortezomib subcutaneously (SC) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each cycle, lenalidomide orally (PO) on days 1-21 of each cycle, and dexamethasone PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each cycle. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 9 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. MAINTENANCE CYCLES 10+: Patients receive lenalidomide PO on days 1-21 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM II (DRd-R): INDUCTION CYCLES 1-9: Patients receive daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj SC on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycles 1-2, days 1 and 15 of cycles 3-6, and day 1 of cycles 7-9, lenalidomide PO on days 1-21 of each cycle, and dexamethasone PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each cycle. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 9 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. MAINTENANCE CYCLES 10+: Patients receive lenalidomide PO on days 1-21 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM III (DRd-DR): INDUCTION CYCLES 1-9: Patients receive daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj SC on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycles 1-2, days 1 and 15 of cycles 3-6, and day 1 of cycles 7-9, lenalidomide PO on days 1-21 of each cycle, and dexamethasone PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each cycle. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 9 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. MAINTENANCE CYCLES 10+: Patients receive daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj SC on day 1 of each cycle and lenalidomide PO on days 1-21 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 1 year, every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually for up to 10 years.
Phase
3Span
340 weeksSponsor
SWOG Cancer Research NetworkDanville, Illinois
Recruiting
Testing the Addition of Immunotherapy Before Surgery for Patients With Sarcomatoid Mesothelioma
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the percentage of patients with potentially resectable non-epithelioid mesothelioma who are able to proceed with surgery after neoadjuvant ipilimumab and nivolumab. II. To determine the progression-free survival rate at 12 months after the initiation of neoadjuvant ipilimumab and nivolumab. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the rate of intra-operative or post-operative complications following neoadjuvant immunotherapy. II. Best response per modified pleural Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). III. Major pathologic response rate. IV. Time to recurrence after surgery. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the association between the change in peripheral T cell clonality relative to baseline and treatment response. II. To evaluate the association between PD-L1 expression at baseline and treatment response. III. To evaluate whether a novel mesothelioma immune signature identified by Dr. Mansfield's laboratory is predictive of response. OUTLINE: Patients receive nivolumab intravenously (IV), ipilimumab IV, and may undergo surgery on study. Patients also undergo computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) throughout the trial.
Phase
2Span
107 weeksSponsor
Alliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyDanville, Illinois
Recruiting
Ramucirumab Plus Pembrolizumab vs Usual Care for Treatment of Stage IV or Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Following Immunotherapy, Pragmatica-Lung Study
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To compare overall survival (OS) in participants previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and immunotherapy for stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) randomized to pembrolizumab and ramucirumab versus standard of care. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: I. To summarize reports of serious and unexpected high-grade (>= grade 3) treatment-related adverse events determined by the treating physician within each treatment arm. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM A: Patients receive chemotherapy per standard of care on study. ARM B: Patients receive ramucirumab intravenously (IV) and pembrolizumab IV on study.
Phase
3Span
262 weeksSponsor
SWOG Cancer Research NetworkDanville, Illinois
Recruiting
Testing the Addition of an Anti-Cancer Drug, Irinotecan, to the Standard Chemotherapy Treatment (FOLFOX) After Long-Course Radiation Therapy for Advanced-Stage Rectal Cancers to Improve the Rate of Complete Response and Long-Term Rates of Organ Preservation
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To evaluate and compare the clinical complete response (cCR) rates in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant long-course neoadjuvant radiotherapy (LCRT) followed by neoadjuvant modified fluorouracil, irinotecan, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) versus neoadjuvant LCRT followed by neoadjuvant modified leucovorin , fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate and compare organ-preservation-time (OPT) between two treatment arms. II. To evaluate and compare the disease-free survival (DFS) time between the two treatment arms. III. To evaluate and compare time to distant metastasis between two treatment arms. IV. To evaluate and compare overall survival (OS) between two treatment arms. V. To evaluate and compare toxicity profiles of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) between two treatment arms. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE: I. Evaluation of circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA) kinetics during neoadjuvant therapy & surveillance and to correlate with radiographic, pathologic, and clinical outcomes. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. GROUP I: Patients receive long-course chemoradiation therapy on study and then receive either: FOLFOX regimen consisting of leucovorin intravenously (IV), fluorouracil IV, and oxaliplatin IV or CAPOX consisting of capecitabine orally (PO), and oxaliplatin IV on study. Patients undergo computed tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and biospecimen collection throughout the trial. Patients also undergo sigmoidoscopy throughout the trial and biopsy during screening. GROUP II: Patients receive long-course chemoradiation therapy on study and then receive FOLFIRINOX regimen consisting of leucovorin IV, fluorouracil IV, irinotecan IV, and oxaliplatin IV on study. Patients undergo CT scan, MRI scan, and blood specimen collection throughout the trial. Patients undergo sigmoidoscopy throughout the trial and biopsy during screening.
Phase
2Span
512 weeksSponsor
Alliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyDanville, Illinois
Recruiting
Collecting Blood Samples From Patients With and Without Cancer to Evaluate Tests for Early Cancer Detection
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To provide a blinded reference set of cancer versus (vs.) non-cancer blood samples that will be used to validate assays for inclusion in a prospective clinical trial focused on utility of blood-based multi-cancer early detection. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Evaluate test performance at the time of initial cancer diagnosis by tumor type. II. Evaluate test performance at the time of initial cancer diagnosis by clinical stage. OUTLINE: Participants complete a questionnaire at baseline. Participants undergo collection of blood samples at registration and at 12 months after registration. Patients with a cancer diagnosis may undergo collection of tissue samples at registration and 12 months after registration. After completion of study, participants are followed up at 1 year.
Phase
N/ASpan
237 weeksSponsor
Alliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyDanville, Illinois
Recruiting
Healthy Volunteers
Testing the Addition of Stereotactic Radiation Therapy With Immune Therapy for the Treatment of Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer, SAMURAI Study
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To determine whether the addition of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to the primary tumor in combination with immunotherapy improves outcomes compared to immunotherapy alone in patients with metastatic, unresected, renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The primary endpoint is nephrectomy and radiographic progression-free survival (nrPFS) with progression determined as per iRECIST criteria. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the safety, toxicity and tolerability of the two treatment strategies as defined by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5 in each treatment arm. II. To assess the objective response rate (ORR) by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (iRECIST) in each treatment arm. III. Nephrectomy and radiographic progression-free survival excluding nephrectomies that were performed for non-protocol specified indications (nephrectomy and radiographic progression-free survival [nrPFS]2). IV. Radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS). V. To assess overall survival (OS) in each treatment arm. VI. To assess the time to subsequent second-line therapy or death in each treatment arm. VII. To assess the rate of cytoreductive nephrectomy in each treatment arm. VIII. To assess treatment-free survival in patients who discontinue therapy for reason other than radiographic disease progression. IX. To assess the ORR by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 and iRECIST in the primary renal mass. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess composite nrPFS in the predefined histological subgroups below: Ia. Clear cell versus non-clear cell histology. Ib. International Metastatic RCC database consortium (IMDC) intermediate versus poor risk group. Ic. Systemic treatment with immunotherapy-immunotherapy combination versus immunotherapy-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeted therapy combination. Id. Sarcomatoid versus non sarcomatoid variant. II. To identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers of response to SABR in the context of immunotherapy based treatment via assessment of tissue and blood based biomarkers. III. To evaluate the abscopal effect of SABR with systemic therapy. IIIa. Compare ORR in non-irradiated target lesions in the control arm patients undergoing immunotherapy alone to the experimental arm undergoing SABR + immunotherapy. IV. To evaluate the impact of treatment on level of inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus. V. To compare accruing center identified iRECIST progression and centrally identified iRECIST progression events on computed tomography (CT). OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive one of the following immunotherapy regimens per physician discretion: nivolumab intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes and ipilimumab IV over 30 minutes every 3 weeks for 4 doses followed by nivolumab IV over 30 minutes every 2 or 4 weeks; pembrolizumab IV over 30 minutes every 3 or 6 weeks and axitinib orally (PO) twice daily (BID); avelumab IV over 60 minutes every 2 weeks and axitinib PO BID; nivolumab IV over 30 minutes every 2 or 4 weeks and cabozantinib PO once daily (QD); OR pembrolizumab IV over 30 minutes every 3 or 6 weeks and lenvatinib PO QD. Treatment with immunotherapy continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM II: Patients undergo SABR on 3 different days over 1-3 weeks and receive immunotherapy as in Arm I. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 6 months for 5 years, and then annually for 3 years.
Phase
2Span
520 weeksSponsor
NRG OncologyDanville, Illinois
Recruiting
Testing the Use of Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine Compared to the Usual Treatment (Chemotherapy With Docetaxel Plus Trastuzumab) or Trastuzumab Deruxtecan for Recurrent, Metastatic, or Unresectable HER2-Expressing Salivary Gland Cancers
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine if trastuzumab emtansine (ado-trastuzumab emtansine [T-DM1]) shows better progression-free survival (PFS) when compared to docetaxel plus trastuzumab (TH) in recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) HER2-positive salivary gland cancer (SGC) patients who have not previously received HER2 therapy for unresectable or recurrent and/or metastatic disease, as determined by local assessment. (HER2-Positive Cohort) II. To determine the overall response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version (v)1.1 criteria with DS-8201a (trastuzumab deruxtecan) in R/M HER2-low expressing SGC patients. (HER2-Low Expressing Cohort) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1 criteria between arms. (HER2-Positive Cohort) II. To compare overall survival (OS) between arms. (HER2-Positive Cohort) III. To compare toxicity using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 criteria between arms. (HER2-Positive Cohort) IV. To assess patient-reported toxicity, as measured by the patient reported outcome (PRO)-CTCAE, between arms, and explore patient-reported symptomatic adverse events (AEs) for tolerability of each treatment arm as measured by the PRO-CTCAE. (HER2-Positive Cohort) V. To assess PFS with DS-8201a (trastuzumab deruxtecan) in HER2-low expressing SGC patients. (HER2-Low Expressing Cohort) VI. To assess OS with DS-8201a (trastuzumab deruxtecan) in HER2-low expressing SGC patients. (HER2-Low Expressing Cohort) VII. To evaluate toxicity of DS-8201a (trastuzumab deruxtecan) using CTCAE v5.0. (HER2-Low Expressing Cohort) EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the ORR in patients who receive crossover treatment to T-DM1/TH following disease progression on the TH arm/T-DM1 arm. II. To collect blood and tissue specimens for future translational science studies to examine how tumor genetics, HER2 signaling output/expression, HER2 tumoral heterogeneity, and androgen receptor expression/signaling impacts H and T-DM1 efficacy in the HER2-positive cohort and DS-8201a (trastuzumab deruxtecan) efficacy in the HER2-low expressing cohort. OUTLINE: Patients with HER2-positive disease are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. Patients with HER2-low expression disease are assigned to Arm III. ARM I: Patients receive docetaxel intravenously (IV) over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Treatment repeats every 21 days for up to 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also receive trastuzumab IV over 90 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients on Arm I (TH) can cross over to Arm II (T-DM1) after first progression. Patients undergo a computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and echocardiography (ECHO) or multigated acquisition (MUGA) scan throughout the trial. Patients may also undergo blood sample collection during screening and on study, as well as a biopsy during screening. ARM II: Patients receive trastuzumab emtansine IV over 90 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients on Arm II (T-DM1) can cross over to Arm I (TH) after first progression. Patients undergo a CT scan or MRI and ECHO or MUGA scan throughout the trial. Patients may also undergo blood sample collection and during screening and on study, as well as a biopsy during screening. ARM III: Patients receive trastuzumab deruxtecan IV over 30-90 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo a CT scan or MRI and ECHO or MUGA scan throughout the trial. Patients may also undergo blood sample collection and during screening and on study, as well as a biopsy during screening. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for an additional 3-5 years, then annually.
Phase
2Span
283 weeksSponsor
NRG OncologyDanville, Illinois
Recruiting
Two Studies for Patients With Unfavorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Testing Less Intense Treatment for Patients With a Low Gene Risk Score and Testing a More Intense Treatment for Patients With a Higher Gene Risk Score, The Guidance Trial
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine whether men with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) unfavorable intermediate risk (UIR) prostate cancer and lower Decipher genomic risk (Decipher score < 0.40) treated with radiation therapy (RT) alone instead of 6 months androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) + RT experience non-inferior rate of distant metastasis. (De-intensification study) II. To determine whether men with NCCN UIR prostate cancer who are in the higher genomic risk (Decipher score >= 0.40) will have a superior metastasis-free survival through treatment intensification with darolutamide added to the standard of RT plus 6 months ADT. (Intensification study) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare overall survival (OS) between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. II. To compare time to prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. III. To compare metastasis free survival (MFS) based on conventional imaging between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and de-intensification intervention (RT alone). IV. To compare MFS based on either conventional and/or molecular imaging between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. V. To compare cumulative incidence of locoregional failure based upon conventional imaging and/ or biopsy between standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. VI. To compare cumulative incidence of distant metastasis based upon conventional imaging between standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and intensification intervention (RT plus 6 months ADT plus darolutamide). VII. To compare cumulative incidence of distant metastasis based upon either conventional and/or molecular imaging between standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. VIII. To compare prostate cancer-specific mortality between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. IX. To compare sexual and hormonal related quality of life, as measured by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC), between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. X. To compare fatigue, as measured by the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Fatigue instrument, between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. XI. To compare cognition, as measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Cognitive (FACT-Cog) perceived cognitive abilities subscale, between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare changes in cardio-metabolic markers, including body mass index, lipids, blood glucose, complete blood count (CBC), comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP), and hemoglobin (Hgb) A1c, between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. II. To compare PSA failure-free survival with non-castrate testosterone and no additional therapies between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. III. To compare cumulative incidence of locoregional failure based upon either conventional and/or molecular imaging between standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. IV. To compare castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. V. To compare bowel and urinary function related quality of life, as measured by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC), between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. VI. To compare time to testosterone recovery (defined as a T > 200ng/dL) between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. VII. To compare health utilities, as measured by the European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L), between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. VIII. To develop and assess a machine learning/artificial intelligence algorithm for radiotherapy planning and/or quality assurance. IX. To perform future translational correlative studies using biological data, Decipher results, and clinical outcomes. OUTLINE: DE-INTENSIFICATION STUDY: Patients with Decipher score < 0.40 are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients undergo radiation therapy (RT) using a recognized regimen (2-3 days a week or 5 days a week for 2-11 weeks) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM II: Patients undergo RT as Arm I. Patients also receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) consisting of leuprolide, goserelin, buserelin, histrelin, triptorelin, degarelix, or relugolix at the discretion of the treating physician, for 6 months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients may also receive bicalutamide or flutamide for 0, 30 or 180 days. INTENSIFICATION STUDY: Patients with Decipher score >= 0.40 are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM III: Patients receive treatment as in Arm II. ARM IV: Patients receive RT and ADT as in Arm II. Patients also receive darolutamide orally (PO) twice daily (BID). Treatment repeats every 90 days for up to 2 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months.
Phase
3Span
258 weeksSponsor
NRG OncologyDanville, Illinois
Recruiting
Comparing Cisplatin Every Three Weeks to Cisplatin Weekly When Combined With Radiation for Patients With Advanced Head and Neck Cancer
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine whether radiation with cisplatin weekly is superior in terms of acute toxicity, as measured by the T-scores (TAME method), to radiation with cisplatin every 3 weeks for patients with locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). (Phase II) II. To determine whether radiation with cisplatin weekly is non-inferior to radiation with cisplatin every 3 weeks in terms of overall survival (OS) for patients with locoregionally advanced SCCHN. (Phase III) III. To determine whether radiation with cisplatin weekly is superior in terms of acute toxicity, as measured by the T-scores (TAME method), to radiation with cisplatin every 3 weeks for patients with locoregionally advanced SCCHN. (Phase III) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess and compare progression-free survival (PFS) between arms. II. To assess and compare locoregional failure and distant metastasis between arms. III. To assess acute and late toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] version 5.0). IV. To assess patient-reported outcomes quality of life (PRO/QOL), as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACT-H&N) (primary PRO), between arms. V. To assess hearing loss, as measured by audiograms and the modified TUNE grading scale between arms. VI. To assess hearing loss, as measured by speech audiometry Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant word scores and tympanometry (subject to the modified TUNE grading scale testing results; otherwise, it will be an exploratory objective). VII. To assess hearing-related QOL as measured by the Hearing Handicap Inventory-Screening (HHIA-S) (secondary PRO), between arms. VIII. To assess long-term PFS, OS, and toxicity between arms. IX. To assess 3-year restricted-mean survival time for OS and PFS between arms (if long-term update is warranted). EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE: I. To collect blood and tissue specimens for future translational science studies. For instance, to examine how germline and somatic genetic variants, such as TP53, CDKN2A, PIK3CA, PTEN, NFE2L2, and KEAP1, may influence cisplatin-related efficacy and toxicity, and to assess the effect of regular nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) use and genomic activation of PIK3CA (mutation or amplification) or loss of PTEN, the negative regulator of PI3K, on disease-free survival or overall survival. OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I (NON-OROPHARYNGEAL CANCER [OPC]/p16-NEGATIVE OPC group and p16-NEGATIVE OPC/CANCER OF UNKNOWN PRIMARY [CUP] group): Patients undergo radiation therapy over 5 fractions a week for a total of 33-35 fractions in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also receive cisplatin intravenously (IV) once every 3 weeks (Q3W) (on days 1, 22, and 43) during radiation therapy in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM II (NON-OROPHARYNGEAL CANCER [OPC]/p16-NEGATIVE OPC group and p16-NEGATIVE OPC/CANCER OF UNKNOWN PRIMARY [CUP] group): Patients undergo radiation therapy over 5 fractions a week for a total of 33-35 fractions in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also receive cisplatin IV once a week (QW) for 7 weeks during radiation therapy in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo computed tomography (CT) scan, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or position emission tomography (PET) scan throughout the study.
Phase
2/3Span
210 weeksSponsor
NRG OncologyDanville, Illinois
Recruiting
Colon Adjuvant Chemotherapy Based on Evaluation of Residual Disease
Currently, there are no biomarkers validated prospectively in randomized studies for resected colon cancer to determine need for adjuvant chemotherapy. However, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) shed into the bloodstream represents a highly specific and sensitive approach (especially with serial monitoring) for identifying microscopic or residual tumor cells in colon cancer patients and may outperform traditional clinical and pathological features in prognosticating risk for recurrence. Colon cancer patients who do not have detectable ctDNA (ctDNA-) are at a much lower risk of recurrence and may not need adjuvant chemotherapy. Furthermore, for colon cancer pts with detectable ctDNA (ctDNA+) who are at a very high risk of recurrence, the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy regimen has not been established. We hypothesize that for pts whose colon cancer has been resected, ctDNA status may be used to risk stratify for making decisions about adjuvant chemotherapy.
Phase
2/3Span
418 weeksSponsor
NRG OncologyDanville, Illinois
Recruiting