STIMFIX Trail Lead Anchor System for Dorsal Column Stimulator Trail Leads (SECURE Study)
The purpose of the Spinal Cord Stimulator (SCS) trial system is to determine if spinal cord stimulation is effective in adequately relieving the patient's pain and or improving function. Dorsal column stimulator trials are performed in a hospital outpatient setting. Under fluoroscopy, the physician inserts a trial lead into the epidural space. The lead is connected to a cable and an external generator worn over the body. Via the external generator, the physician tests various lead positions and stimulation parameters to identify optimal positions and settings. Then the patient is sent home with the temporary device in place. After the trial period of anywhere between 7 to 10 days, the physician meets with the patient to evaluate the effect of spinal cord stimulation and to determine if the permanent implantation is appropriate for the patient. After the discussion, the physician proceeds to remove the trial leads after carefully removing the adhesives tapes and gentle traction of leads. Issues faced with trial lead anchoring: During the procedure after the trial leads are placed in the desired segment of the spinal cord, the remaining portion of the leads at the insertion site are coiled, and along with the device it is adhered to the skin by using wide soft cloth surgical tapes. Also, to absorb the blood and fluid oozing at the lead insertion site, soft surgical gauze is used as an absorbent pad. During this part of the procedure, there is a risk of lead displacement either while coiling the leftover lead or while using the wide surgical tape. Also, using only the soft, absorbent surgical gauze might increase the incidences of potential infection. Proposed solution: Stimfix Trial lead anchoring system comes with the right and left clips which can hold the respective side of the leads above the skin. This system reduces the rate of displacement of the leads in the epidural space. The device is made of flexible polyurethane that allows for malleability during use for the one week. In addition foam that is silver impregnated and absorbable allows for potential reduced rates of infection and need for external absorbent pad. Aim 1: A total of 50 subjects who are undergoing dorsal column stimulator trial will be studied and placed on the SECURE study where their trial leads will be anchored using the StimfixTM system. The trial duration will be for seven days as per standard of care.
Phase
N/ASpan
116 weeksSponsor
STIMFIXLos Angeles, California
Recruiting
Testing the Use of Chemotherapy After Surgery for High-Risk Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To evaluate recurrence-free survival (RFS) in participants with resected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) randomized to treatment with capecitabine + temozolomide (CAPTEM) compared to observation only. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate overall survival (OS) in participants randomized to treatment with CAPTEM compared to observation only. II. To evaluate the safety and tolerability of CAPTEM compared to observation only. BANKING OBJECTIVE: I. To bank specimens for future correlative studies. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive capecitabine orally (PO) twice daily (BID) on days 1-14 and temozolomide PO once daily (QD) on days 10-14. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 4 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM II: Patients undergo surveillance with no active treatment. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 6 months for 3 years and then annually until 5 years from randomization.
Phase
2Span
256 weeksSponsor
SWOG Cancer Research NetworkBuena Park, California
Recruiting
Comparing the Outcome of Immunotherapy-Based Drug Combination Therapy With or Without Surgery to Remove the Kidney in Metastatic Kidney Cancer, the PROBE Trial
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To compare overall survival in participants with newly diagnosed metastatic renal cell carcinoma who are randomized to receive immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination treatment plus cytoreductive nephrectomy versus immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination treatment alone. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare overall survival between arms in the subset who received their assigned protocol treatment. II. To assess complications of nephrectomy and post-randomization drug toxicities. III. To compare objective response rate in metastatic sites between the arms in participants with measurable metastatic disease. IV. To assess change in diameter of primary tumor at week 12 disease assessment in participants who have received pre-randomization treatment. BANKING OBJECTIVE: I. To bank specimens for future correlative studies. OUTLINE: PRE-RANDOMIZATION TREATMENT: Treatment naive patients are assigned to 1 of 3 treatment regimens per standard of care. REGIMEN I: Patients receive nivolumab intravenously (IV) and ipilimumab IV. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for up to 4 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients then receive nivolumab IV on day 1. Cycles repeat every 2-4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. REGIMEN II: Patients receive pembrolizumab IV on day 1 and axitinib orally (PO) twice daily (BID) on days 1-21. Cycles repeat every 3 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. REGIMEN III: Patients receive avelumab IV on day 1 and axitinib PO BID on days 1-14. Cycles repeat every 2 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. NOTE: Some patients may have already completed the standard of care pre-randomization treatment specified above off-trial. RANDOMIZATION TREATMENT: Between 10-14 weeks from the start of on-trial or off-trial pre-randomization treatment, patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive nivolumab IV, pembrolizumab IV, or avelumab IV on day 1. Patients also receive axitinib PO BID. Cycles with nivolumab repeat every 2 or 4 weeks, cycles with pembrolizumab repeat every 3 weeks, and cycles with avelumab repeat every 2 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM II: Within 42 days following randomization, patients undergo radical or partial nephrectomy in addition to nivolumab, pembrolizumab, avelumab, and axitinib as in Arm I in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Axitinib should be stopped at least 24 hours prior to surgery. After completion of trial treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for the first year, every 6 months for years 2 and 3, and then annually for up to 7 years from randomization.
Phase
3Span
647 weeksSponsor
SWOG Cancer Research NetworkBuena Park, California
Recruiting
A Study to Compare Two Surgical Procedures in Individuals With BRCA1 Mutations to Assess Reduced Risk of Ovarian Cancer
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To compare the non-inferiority of bilateral salpingectomy (BLS) with delayed oophorectomy to bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer among individuals with deleterious BRCA1 germline mutations. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To prospectively assess estrogen deprivation symptoms in pre-menopausal BLS patients as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Endocrine Symptom (FACT-ES) subscale compared to pre-menopausal patients in the BSO arm. II. To determine if health-related quality of life (QOL) (FACT) is negatively impacted by menopausal symptoms (menopausal symptom checklist-Menopausal Symptom Checklist [MSCL]) and sexual dysfunction (Female Sexual Function Index [FSFI]) in pre-menopausal patients who have undergone BLS, in comparison to normative data (MSCL/FACT-ES) and data from pre-menopausal BSO patients. III. To determine if health-related QOL (FACT) is negatively impacted by cancer distress (Impact of Event Scale [IES]) in individuals who have undergone BLS, in comparison to BSO patients. IV. To assess medical decision making, as measured by the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and Decision Regret Scale (DRS), and determine factors associated with the risk of reducing surgical treatment choice. V. To assess adverse events, graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v)5.0. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. Sexual dysfunction, as measured by selected Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) screener and external sexual function items (pre-menopausal patients). II. To estimate the cost-effectiveness of BLS compared to BSO for ovarian cancer risk reduction. III. To assess medical decision making, as measured by the Risk-Reducing Medical Decision Making (RR-MDM) survey, a targeted set of questions on risk reducing surgical treatment choice. TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: I. To bank tissue and blood biospecimens for future research. OUTLINE: Patients choose between 1 of 2 groups. GROUP I: Patients undergo bilateral salpingectomy. Patients may then undergo oophorectomy after initial surgery. GROUP II: Patients undergo bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Patients in both groups also undergo a pelvic or transvaginal ultrasound during screening and blood sample collection throughout the trial. After completion of study, patients are followed up at 10-60 days, 6, 12, and 24 months, and then annually for up to 20 years.
Phase
N/ASpan
877 weeksSponsor
NRG OncologyBuena Park, California
Recruiting
Letrozole With or Without Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Treating Patients With Stage II-IV Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To examine if letrozole monotherapy/maintenance (L/L) is non-inferior to intravenous (IV) paclitaxel/carboplatin and maintenance letrozole (CT/L) with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) in women with stage II-IV primary low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum after primary surgical cytoreduction. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the nature, frequency and maximum degree of toxicity as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v) 5.0 for each treatment arm. II. To compare the relative frequency of objective tumor response in those with measurable disease after cytoreductive surgery for each treatment arm. III. To compare overall survival for each treatment arm. IV. To compare the CT/L and L/L arms with respect to patients' adherence to letrozole therapy as measured by pill counts. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive paclitaxel IV over 3 hours and carboplatin IV on day 1. Cycles repeat every 21 days for up to 6 cycles. Patients then receive letrozole orally (PO) once daily (QD) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo blood collection and tumor biopsy during screening as well as medical imaging throughout the study. ARM II: Patients receive letrozole PO QD. Cycles repeat every 21 days for up to 6 cycles. Patients then receive letrozole orally PO QD in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity as maintenance therapy. Patients undergo blood collection and tumor biopsy during screening as well as medical imaging throughout the study. After completion of study treatment/intervention, patients/participants are followed up every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months for 3 years, then annually thereafter.
Phase
3Span
437 weeksSponsor
NRG OncologyBuena Park, California
Recruiting
Testing Low Dose Tamoxifen for Invasive Breast Cancer, the (LoTam) Trial
The primary and secondary objectives of the study: PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To evaluate whether the recurrence-free interval (RFI) with low-dose tamoxifen is non-inferior to standard-of-care endocrine therapy among post-menopausal women with early-stage, low molecular risk breast cancer. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare endocrine therapy nonadherence rates between treatment arms. II. To compare the incidence of adverse events between treatment arms, including osteoporosis, fracture, endometrial carcinoma, stroke, and deep vein thrombosis. III. To compare endocrine therapy-related patient reported symptoms between treatment arms. IV. To compare the invasive disease-free survival between treatment arms. V. To compare the locoregional breast cancer recurrence between treatment arms. VI. To compare distant recurrence free survival between treatment arms. VII. To compare overall survival between treatment arms. VIII. To compare ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) incidence (ipsilateral and contralateral) between treatment arms. IX. To evaluate the association between radiotherapy modality (no radiation, partial breast radiation, and whole breast radiation) and RFI in each arm. X. To explore important measures of quality of life that would reasonably be expected to vary by study arm, including global quality of life and reasons for nonadherence. XI. To compare change in mammographic density at two years between treatment arms. XII. To conduct a within patient comparison of automated versus (vs) semi-automated mammographic density determination. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive standard of care endocrine therapy per physician choice with either anastrozole orally (PO), letrozole PO, exemestane PO or standard dose tamoxifen PO once daily (QD) for up to 5 years in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients may also undergo mammogram or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), dual X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), and blood sample collection on study. ARM II: Patients receive low-dose tamoxifen PO every other day (QOD) for up to 5 years in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients may also undergo mammogram or MRI, DEXA, and blood sample collection on study. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 10 years after registration.
Phase
3Span
346 weeksSponsor
Alliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyBuena Park, California
Recruiting
Multicenter Study of Lumateperone for the Treatment of Irritability Associated With Autism Spectrum Disorder in Pediatric Patients
The study will be conducted in 3 phases: - Screening Period (up to 14 days) during which patient eligibility will be assessed. - Double-blind Treatment Period (DBTP) (6 weeks) during which all patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either lumateperone high dose, lumateperone low dose, or placebo as a once daily dose. - Safety Follow-up Period (1 week) during which all patients will return to the clinic for a safety follow-up (SFU) visit approximately 1 week after the last dose of study drug.
Phase
3Span
127 weeksSponsor
Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.Buena Park, California
Recruiting
MILD® Percutaneous Image-Guided Lumbar Decompression: A Medicare Claims Study
In this study the treatment group will include all patients receiving MILD, and the control group will include all patients receiving IPD for the treatment of LSS during the enrollment period. Reoperation and harms data will be studied for the MILD and IPD procedures for a 24-month follow-up period after the index procedure using Medicare claims data. This study is exempt from IRB oversight (Department of Health and Human Services regulations 45 CFR 46) and does not require prior enrollment nor patient consent. The inclusion of the study's NCT number on MILD Medicare claims is required and results in enrollment.
Phase
N/ASpan
512 weeksSponsor
Vertos Medical, Inc.Buena Park, California
Recruiting
Evaluating the Addition of Adjuvant Chemotherapy to Ovarian Function Suppression Plus Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Patients With pN0-1, ER-Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer and an Oncotype Recurrence Score Less Than or Equal to 25
Younger age at diagnosis is an adverse prognostic factor in early breast cancer: women who are less than 35 years of age at diagnosis are more likely to die from their disease than their older counterparts following standard treatments. There remains a pressing need for advancements in therapeutic options for this patient population. One increasingly utilized option is ovarian suppression, which was first reported as treatment for advanced breast cancer in 1896 and has been examined in a multitude of clinical trials over the past century. As chemotherapeutic options became more commonplace for breast cancer therapy, however, the role of ovarian suppression became uncertain. In the pre-genomic era, several studies evaluated the role of ovarian suppression compared to chemotherapy, with conflicting results. These studies either looked at ovarian suppression alone or at tamoxifen compared to chemotherapy. A meta-analysis examining LHRH-agonists (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone) in the Early Breast Cancer Overview group (LHRH-agonists in Early Breast Cancer Overview group 2007) showed that when LHRH-agonists were added to tamoxifen, chemotherapy, or both, there was a 12.7% reduction in the risk of recurrence and a 15.1% reduction in the risk of death. When compared to chemotherapy, LHRH-agonists appeared to be equally as effective, especially if patients were less than 40 years of age. These older studies, conducted in the pre-taxane/anthracycline era, typically used CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil) chemotherapy, and were designed prior to the use of genomic assays .
Phase
3Span
570 weeksSponsor
NRG OncologyBuena Park, California
Recruiting
Testing the Addition of an Anti-Cancer Drug, TRC102, to the Usual Chemotherapy Treatment (Pemetrexed, Cisplatin or Carboplatin) During Radiation Therapy for Stage III Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To improve progression-free survival (PFS) from 56% with current standard of care (chemoradiation followed by consolidative durvalumab) to 75% at one year with the proposed combination followed by consolidative durvalumab. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine overall survival with the proposed combination therapy. II. To assess the incidence of grade 3 or higher pneumonitis and other toxicities. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive methoxyamine orally (PO) on day 1 of each cycle, pemetrexed intravenously (IV) over 10 minutes on day 1 of each cycle, and cisplatin IV over 60 minutes or carboplatin IV over 30 minutes on day 3 of each cycle. Beginning day 3, patients also undergo radiation therapy daily Monday-Friday. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 2 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Beginning 2-6 weeks after cycle 2, patients receive durvalumab IV over 60 minutes every 2 weeks or monthly for up to 1 year in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) throughout the trial and fludeoxyglucose F-18 (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scan during screening and optionally on study. ARM II: Patients receive pemetrexed IV over 10 minutes and cisplatin IV over 60 minutes or carboplatin IV over 30 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Beginning day 1 of each cycle, patients also undergo radiation therapy daily Monday-Friday. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 2 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Beginning 2-6 weeks after cycle 2, patients receive durvalumab IV over 60 minutes every 2 weeks or monthly for up to 1 year in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo CT scan or MRI throughout the trial and FDG-PET/CT scan during screening and optionally on study. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days, and then every 3 months for 2 years, followed by every 6 months for an additional 3 years.
Phase
2Span
159 weeksSponsor
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Buena Park, California
Recruiting