Marseille, Cedex 9, France

Axillary Management in Breast Cancer Patients with Needle Biopsy Proven Nodal Metastases After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Background: The presence of cancer in the axillary lymph nodes on needle biopsy in patients with early stage breast cancer before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been the determinant of the need for axillary treatment (in the form of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or axillary radiotherapy (ART)) after completion of NACT. Treatment to the axilla damages lymphatic drainage from the arm and patients can subsequently develop lymphoedema, restricted shoulder movement, pain, numbness, and other sensory problems. As more effective chemotherapy is now available that results in complete eradication of cancer in the axilla in around 40 to 70% of patients, extensive axillary treatment might no longer be necessary in patients with no evidence of residual nodal disease. Aim: To assess whether, omitting further axillary treatment (ALND and ART) for patients with early stage breast cancer and axillary nodal metastases on needle biopsy, who after NACT have no residual cancer in the lymph nodes on sentinel node biopsy, is non-inferior to axillary treatment in terms of disease free survival (DFS) and results in reduced risk of lymphoedema at 5 years. Methods: Study design: A pragmatic, phase 3, open, randomised, multicentre trial and embedded economic evaluation in which participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio. Study population: T1-3N1M0 breast cancer patients aged 18 years or older, with needle biopsy proven nodal metastases, who after NACT have no residual cancer in the lymph nodes on dual tracer sentinel node biopsy and removal of at least 3 lymph nodes (sentinel nodes and marked involved node). Intervention: All participants will receive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted treatment, endocrine therapy and radiotherapy to breast or chest wall, if indicated according to local guidelines. Patients in the intervention group will not receive further axillary treatment (ALND or ART), whereas those receiving standard care will receive axillary treatment (ALND or ART) as per local guidelines. Follow-up is annually for at least 5 years. Outcomes: The co-primary outcomes are disease free survival(DFS) and self-reported lymphoedema defined as 'yes' to the two questions participants will be asked - 'arm heaviness during the past year' and 'arm swelling now' from the Lymphoedema and Breast Cancer Questionnaire at 5 years. Secondary outcomes: arm function assessed by the QuickDASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) questionnaire; health related quality of life assessed using euroqol EQ-5D-5L; axillary recurrence free interval (ARFI); local recurrence; regional (nodal) recurrence; distant metastasis; overall survival; contralateral breast cancer; non-breast malignancy; costs; quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and cost-effectiveness. Sample size: A sample size of 1900 patients would have the ability to demonstrate a 3.5% non-inferiority margin with a 5% 1-sided significance level and 85% power, allowing for 7% non-collection of primary outcome data assuming a 90% 5-year disease free survival rate in the control arm. It would also be able to detect at least a 5% difference in proportion of patients with lymphoedema with 90% power, a 5% 2-sided significance level and allowing for 25% non-collection of primary outcome data over 5 years. Analysis plan: All analyses will be carried out on an intention-to-treat basis to preserve randomisation, avoid bias from exclusions and preserve statistical power. Time to event outcomes, including disease free survival and axillary recurrence free interval, will be assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using Cox proportional hazards models. The proportion of patients experiencing lymphoedema at 5 years will be compared across trial arms using a chi-squared test and a logistic regression model used to adjust for stratification variables. Arm morbidity and health related quality of life will be scored using the appropriate manuals and assessed using a longitudinal mixed model regression analysis if model assumptions valid or a standardised area-under-the-curve analysis. For economic evaluation, incremental cost per QALY gained at 5 years will be estimated. Timelines for delivery: Total project duration is 120 months based on 6 months for set up; 60 months recruitment period (including an 18 months internal pilot phase); and 54 months for follow up, analysis, writing up and dissemination.

MITHRIDATE: Ruxolitinib Versus Hydroxycarbamide or Interferon as First Line Therapy in High Risk Polycythemia Vera

The trial will be a phase III, randomised-controlled, multi-centre, international, open-label trial consisting of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy, where best available therapy is a choice of interferon alpha, any formulation permitted (IFN) or hydroxycarbamide (HC), and which will be elected by the Investigator prior to randomisation. There will be no cross-over either between arm A and B or between therapies on Arm B HC and IFN will be provided as best available therapy, IFN can include standard of pegylated-interferon at Investigators discretion.

Myeloma XIV: Frailty-adjusted Therapy in Transplant Non-Eligible Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

The Role of Ixazomib in Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Relapsed Myeloma - Myeloma XII (ACCoRd)

Long-term Outcomes of Lidocaine Infusions for Post-Operative Pain (LOLIPOP) Trial

The Trial's purpose is to evaluate the effectiveness of lidocaine infusions commenced during surgery and extending up to 24 hours postoperatively, on the incidence of moderate or severe chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) detected one year following surgery in female patients undergoing elective breast cancer surgery. The trial has 90% power to detect a clinically meaningful (25%) reduction in the incidence of the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include safety events, analgesic efficacy (pain scores and opioid consumption), neuropathic characteristics of CPSP, and psychological and quality of life outcomes.

Observation of Clinical Routine Care for Heart Failure Patients Implanted With BIOTRONIK CRT Devices

Platinum and Polyadenosine 5'Diphosphoribose Polymerisation Inhibitor for Neoadjuvant Treatment of Triple Negative Breast Cancer and/or Germline BRCA Positive Breast Cancer

Randomised, phase II/III 3 stage trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the addition of olaparib to platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with TNBC and/or gBRCA. Disease under investigation: Breast Cancer Purpose of clinical trial: To establish if the addition of olaparib to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy for Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) and/or germline BRCA (gBRCA) breast cancer is safe and improves efficacy. Trial Design: Open label, randomised, 3-stage Phase II/III Sample Size: Minimum of 780 patients (including at least 220 gBRCA patients equally allocated to the control and the selected research arm). Non Investigational Medicinal Products: Prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to be given as per local practice and 3 cycles of anthracyclines as per local practice. Treatment period: A minimum of 21 weeks of chemotherapy followed by surgery. Procedures: Screening & enrolment Eligible patients with early breast cancer will be registered and consented for screening: BRCA mutation test Tumour Infiltrating Lymphocytes(TILs) score Cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6), Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) +/-, Androgen Receptor (AR) status by Immunohistochemistry (IHC). Standard assessment prior to chemotherapy Standard staging to exclude metastatic disease. When eligibility is confirmed, patients will be randomised via a web-based central system which will allocate each patient a unique randomisation number associated with one of the treatment arms. PARTNERing Pathway - For those patients who still have residual disease after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy +/- olaparib there is the opportunity to be screened to a sub-study to receive a further two cycles of chemotherapy consisting of Duralumab and AZD6738. End of Trial: For patients, the end of trial is after the last follow-up visit or contact with the research team planned 10 years after surgery. Procedures for safety monitoring during trial: Pharmacovigilance will be performed by the PARTNER Trial Office. Also, the Trial Management Group and the Independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee will regularly review the patient safety data. Criteria for discontinuation of trial treatment on safety grounds: Severe toxicity or inter-current illness, requiring cessation in the judgement of patient's clinician. Patient within 4 weeks has not recovered from toxicity to an extent that allows further treatment. Patient unable to comply with trial procedures. Disease progression while on trial treatment. Patient becomes pregnant.

Trial to Test the Effects of Adding 1 of 2 New Treatment Agents to Commonly Used Chemotherapy Combinations

AML18 is a trial primarily for older patients with AML and high risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS). It offers a randomised controlled Phase II/III trial which uses a factorial design for maximum efficiency to evaluate two induction options followed by treatment with small molecule beyond course 1, and dose intensification for patients without evidence of MRD negativity. There are five randomised comparisons within the trial: 1. At diagnosis: For patients not known to have adverse risk cytogenetics DA chemotherapy plus a single dose of 3 mg/m2 of Mylotarg versus CPX-351. Patients with abnormal LFTs can enter the randomisation but receive DA alone or CPX-351. 2. For patients who received DA chemotherapy but are not in CR or who are MRD +ve, or for whom MRD is not assessable. DA versus DAC versus FLAG-Ida 3. All patients at second course who have received DA and have not received Vosaroxin and Decitabine induction AC220 versus no AC220 for a maximum of 3 cycles; then with or without maintenance for 1 year for patients allocated AC220 4. For patients who are in CR or CRi and MRD -ve post course1 and have completed 2 courses of DA DA versus intermediate dose Cytarabine (IDAC) 5. For patients who received CPX-351 chemotherapy but are not in CR or who are MRD +ve, or for whom MRD is not assessable CPX-351 100 units/m2 x 3 doses versus CPX-351 100 units/m2 x 2 doses The trial will also assess: - Non-intensive allogeneic stem cell transplant for patients with matched sibling or matched unrelated donors. - The combination of Vosaroxin and Decitabine for those with known adverse risk cytogenetics at diagnosis

A Study to Assess Adverse Events and Change in Disease Activity in Pediatric Participants (Age 6 Months to <2 Years) With Functional Constipation Who Are Treated With Linaclotide

A Study of Milvexian in Participants After a Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome