Riviere, France
Benchmark Evidence Led by Latin America: Trial of Intracranial Pressure - Pediatrics
Abstract: Children who survive severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) live with profound impairments that alter their development and future possibilities. Worldwide, TBI is the leading cause of death and disability for children/ adolescents with the US annual incidence 6 times greater than MS, HIV/AIDS, spinal cord injury, and breast cancer combined. Our primary focus for scientific investigation is to conduct a high quality randomized controlled trial addressing a critical TBI management question: Does using a protocol with information from intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring to direct treatment of children with sTBI improve outcomes vs an aggressive management protocol based on imaging and clinical examination alone? This follows on our adult ICP study which found no outcome differences and has occasioned re-thinking of treatment guidelines for sTBI patients >13. A separate study is essential because children are not simply small adults and some treatment approaches carry age-related additional risks. Thus, study findings will inform US and global clinical practice. This trial will be conducted in 8 Latin American pediatric ICUs where infrastructures and practice patterns are optimal for strong internal validity and resources represent trauma care in the developing world. The successful adolescent/adult BEST TRIP trial, which collected high-quality data in similar environments (cited > 900 times) underscores the feasibility of this approach. Specific Aim: In a Phase III randomized superiority trial in 428 children with sTBI from 8 Latin American pediatric trauma centers, test the effect on outcomes of management of sTBI guided by a protocol using information from ICP monitors vs. management using a protocol that uses imaging and clinical exams to guide treatment. Hypothesis #1: Children with severe TBI whose acute care treatment is managed using a protocol based on data from ICP monitoring will have significantly lower mortality and better quality of life and global outcome at 6 months post-trauma than those whose treatment is managed with a protocol based on imaging and clinical exam. The primary measure of functional recovery is the PedsQL at 6 months. A secondary measure is GOSE-Peds. Hypothesis #2: Incorporating ICP monitoring into sTBI patient care will minimize secondary complications, decrease length of stay in ICU and decrease brain-specific treatments. Specific Aim: The Investigators will train personnel in centers new to research how to conduct high-quality scientific studies, and will extend the training for the personnel with whom the Investigators have been working, solidifying previous capacity-building efforts, and initiating new efforts.
Phase
N/ASpan
198 weeksSponsor
University of WashingtonQuetzaltenango
Recruiting
Quetzaltenango
Recruiting
Safety, Efficacy and Tolerability of Ianalumab Versus Placebo, Combination With SoC Therapy, in Participants With Active Lupus Nephritis
This trial will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of subcutaneous (s.c.) ianalumab given every 4 weeks (q4w) or ianalumab given every 12 weeks (q12w) compared to placebo, in combination with SoC, in adult participants with active LN (ISN/RPS class III, IV active glomerulonephritis with or without co-existing class V features, or pure class V membranous). using the 2003 International Society for Nephrology (ISN)/Renal Pathology Society (RPS) criteria).
Phase
3Span
418 weeksSponsor
Novartis PharmaceuticalsQuetzaltenango
Recruiting
A Clinical Study of Pembrolizumab (+) Berahyaluronidase Alfa (MK-3475A) to Treat Newly-diagnosed Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (MK-3475A-F84)
Phase
3Span
273 weeksSponsor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCQuetzaltenango
Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind 2-arm NEPTUNUS Extension Study to Assess the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Ianalumab in Patients With Sjogrens Syndrome.
The primary purpose of this 3-year treatment extension study is the continued evaluation of the safety and tolerability of treatment with ianalumab 300 mg monthly or every 3 months. An additional purpose is to explore the long-term efficacy of both dosing regimens of ianalumab 300 mg. Trial Design: This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study to assess the long-term safety and tolerability of four treatment regimens of ianalumab in participants with Sjogrens syndrome who have taken part in and completed one of two NEPTUNUS core studies, NEPTUNUS-1 (CVAY736A2301) or NEPTUNUS-2 (CVAY736A2302). There will be no screening period in this trial. From week 48 of the NEPTUNUS core study, participants will be given the opportunity to consent to this extension study. Eligible participants will continue their assigned treatment to receive ianalumab 300 mg either monthly or every 3 months for up to 3 additional years of treatment beyond the 1-year core study period. After the treatment period, all participants will enter a follow-up period to be monitored for at least 20 weeks and then a conditional (if B-cell recovery criteria have not been met) follow-up period. The total post treatment follow-up period is up to 2 years. Study Population: Participants with Sjogrens syndrome who have completed treatment in one of two NEPTUNUS core studies. Study treatment assignment method: Participants randomized to ianalumab 300 mg monthly or every 3 months in one of the NEPTUNUS core studies will continue their assigned treatment. Participants randomized to placebo in the NEPTUNUS core studies will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either ianalumab 300 mg monthly or every 3 months. Participants randomized to ianalumab 300 mg every 3 months will receive placebo (a dummy treatment) once monthly between doses. Committees: An independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) will be utilized for safety review throughout the study. A steering committee will be formed to ensure overview of the study conduct.
Phase
3Span
351 weeksSponsor
Novartis PharmaceuticalsQuetzaltenango
Recruiting
Quetzaltenango
Recruiting