Möser, Germany

Niraparib vs Niraparib Plus Bevacizumab in Patients With Platinum/Taxane-based Chemotherapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Eligible patients will be those patients with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed, advanced (FIGO stage III/IV, except FIGO stage IIIA2 without nodal involvement) invasive high grade epithelial ovarian cancer, peritoneal cancer, or fallopian tube cancer, who have either undergone upfront primary surgery or plan to undergo chemotherapy with interval debulking surgery (IDS). In addition, patients should not have any medical contraindications that would exclude treatment with bevacizumab and/or niraparib. All eligible patients will receive the first cycle of chemotherapy (carboplatin area under curve [AUC] 5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m²) as part of Study Run-In-Period (cycle 1). In parallel, central laboratory will determine the breast cancer (BRCA) status in tumor tissue (tBRCA). All patients with a valid central tBRCA test result will be randomized prior to day 1 of cycle 2 in a 1:1 ratio in the following treatment arms: Arm 1: Patients will receive further 5 cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel q21d followed by niraparib once daily for up to a total of 3 years Arm 2: Patients will receive further 5 cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel plus bevacizumab q21d followed by bevacizumab q21d (for up to 1 year) and niraparib once daily for up to a total of 3 years. The study aims to investigate, if the treatment strategy of carboplatin / paclitaxel / bevacizumab / niraparib is superior to the treatment of carboplatin / paclitaxel / niraparib-Inhibitor in an all-comer population.

Resorbable Magnesium Scaffolds Registry

Study of Acalabrutinib (ACP-196) in Combination With Venetoclax (ABT-199), With and Without Obinutuzumab (GA101) Versus Chemoimmunotherapy for Previously Untreated CLL

This randomized, global, multicenter, open-label, Phase 3 study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of AV and AVG versus chemoimmunotherapy (FCR or BR) in subjects with previously untreated CLL without del(17p) or TP53. Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio into 3 arms through a block stratified randomization procedure. The study includes screening (35 days), treatment (from randomization until study drug discontinuation) and follow-up phase.

Combination of Abemaciclib and Endocrine Therapy in Hormone Receptor Positive HER2 Negative Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer With Focus on Digital Side Effect Management

German MPN-Registry for BCR-ABL 1-Negative Myeloid Neoplasms (Study Group Ulm)

To register a large number of patients with the diagnosis of a BCR-ABL 1- negative myeloid neoplasm (according to WHO 2008 / 2016 classification) in participating centers To store samples from all patients (e.g. bone marrow aspirate, peripheral blood, plasma, and buccal swap, skin biopsy samples in exceptional cases) To perform morphologic and genetic analyses To assess clinical characteristics and outcome data using a defined catalogue containing clinically relevant variables To assess biological disease features and correlate with clinical outcome data (prognostic and predictive markers) To assess quality of life

Selinexor (KPT-330) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)

This is a multicenter, open label, Phase 2b study of the selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) selinexor (40 or 60 milligrams [mg]) given orally (PO) to participants with R/R DLBCL). The study is being conducted in 2 parts (Part 1 and Part 2). For Part 1, a fixed 60 mg dose of selinexor is given orally to 130 participants with R/R DLBCL who have no therapeutic options of demonstrated clinical benefit and who meet eligibility criteria and have none of the exclusion criteria will be enrolled to receive selinexor until either disease progression or intolerance has occurred. For Part 2, approximately 110 participants (55 in each arm) are planned to be enrolled. Participants will be randomized (open label) in a 1:1 ratio to either Arm A (40 mg) or Arm B (60 mg) and will be stratified based on history of prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) versus no prior ASCT. All the participants will be followed until disease progression and/or death.

Therapy Optimisation for the Treatment of Hairy Cell Leukemia

Evaluation of remission status will take place 4 months after treatment. In addition, it will be tested whether patients with non-optimal response will have a benefit from a second cycle of cladribine. Non-optimal response is: patients with detectable residual disease; achievement of partial remission or detectable residual infiltration in the bone marrow.

Phase 2 Trial of Adagrasib Monotherapy and in Combination With Pembrolizumab and a Phase 3 Trial of Adagrasib in Combination in Patients With a KRAS G12C Mutation KRYSTAL-7

The Phase 2 portion of this study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of MRTX849 as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab. There will be 3 cohorts of patients, all of whom have KRAS G12C mutation, have advanced or metastatic NSCLC, and are candidates for first-line treatment. 2 cohorts have PD-L1 TPS score <1% and are randomized to MRTX849 monotherapy or MRTX849 in combination with pembrolizumab. The 3rd cohort has PD-L1 TPS score of 1% or higher and is treated with MRTX849 and pembrolizumab The Phase 3 portion of the study will randomize patients with squamous or nonsquamous NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutation and TPS >=50% in the first-line setting to adagrasib plus pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab. Primary efficacy objective is to compare efficacy between experimental and comparator arms. Secondary and exploratory objectives include evaluation of secondary efficacy endpoints, safety and tolerability, adagrasib PK, PROs, and correlative genomic biomarkers for the combination regimen in the study population. MRTX849 is an orally available small molecule inhibitor of KRAS G12C, and Pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA®) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction between PD-1 and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2.

A Trial to Learn How the Cancer Vaccine BNT116 in Combination With Cemiplimab Works and How Safe the Combination is in Adults With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (EMPOWERVAX Lung 1)

Organ Preservation With Durvalumab-based Immunotherapy in Combination With Chemoradiation as Definitive Therapy for Early Stage Esophageal Adenocarcinoma With Indication for Radical Surgery

Patients with early stage, cT1 and cT2N0 esophageal adenocarcinoma with indication for radical surgery (esophagectomy or transhiatal extended gastrectomy) will be enrolled in two cohorts according to their PD-L1 CPS (cohort 1 CPS < 10, cohort 2 CPS ≥ 10). All patients will receive core treatment consisting of immunotherapy with durvalumab in parallel to 2 cycles FLOT chemotherapy, followed by immunotherapy with durvalumab in parallel to 3 cycles of modified FOLFOX plus concomitant radiation (50 Gy). Eight weeks after this, patients will undergo tumor assessment consisting of esophagogastroduodenoscopy with extensive biopsies (bite-on-bite biopsies and fine-needle aspiration), endoscopic ultrasonography with measurement of maximum tumor thickness, and CT- or MRI-scans for tumor re-evaluation. Surgical resection would be offered only to those patients in whom a locoregional persistence is confirmed on tumor assessment, in the absence of any signs of distant dissemination. Patients with complete remission will enter the maintenance phase receiving durvalumab monotherapy for up to 12 cycles. The primary objective of this trial is to investigate the treatment efficacy of the combination of durvalumab and chemoradiation as organ preservative treatment option avoiding mortality and surgical complications with rate of clinical and pathological complete response (cCR/pCR) at time of endoscopic re-evaluation defined as primary efficacy endpoint. The secondary objectives are the further assessment of the efficacy of the combination of durvalumab and chemoradiation as organ preservative treatment option 1-/2- and 3-year cCR/pCR rate, rate of salvage surgery, 90-day and 1-year mortality as secondary endpoints and to assess the quality of life (QoL).