Thaleischweiler-froschen, Germany

Study of Standard Intensive Chemotherapy Versus Intensive Chemotherapy with CPX-351 in Adult Patients with Newly Diagnosed AML and Intermediate- or Adverse Genetics

International Cooperative Treatment Protocol for Children and Adolescents With Lymphoblastic Lymphoma

The trial LBL 2018 is a collaborative prospective, multi-national, multi-center, randomized clinical trial for the treatment of children and adolescents with newly diagnosed lymphoblastic lymphoma. The LBL 2018 trial will be open for the qualified centers of following participating study Groups (core study cohort): AIEOP (Italy), BFM (Austria, Czech Republic, Germany, Switzerland), BSPHO (Belgium), CoALL (Germany), DCOG (The Netherlands), NOPHO (Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden), PPLLSG (Poland), SEHOP (Spain) and SFCE (France). HKPHOSG (Hong Kong), HPOG (Hungary), ISPHO (Israel), NSPHO (Moscow), SHOP (Portugal) and SPS (Slovak Republic) start patient recruitment into the extended study cohort (without randomization). Over the trial period study groups may switch from the extended study cohort to the core study cohort. Primary objectives: - Randomization R1, all patients eligible: To examine, whether the cumulative incidence of relapses with involvement of the CNS (CNS relapse, pCICR) can be decreased by a modified induction therapy including dexamethasone (experimental arm) instead of prednisone (standard arm) - Randomization R2, only patients with high risk LBL eligible: to examine, whether the probability of event-free survival (pEFS) in these patients can be improved by receiving an intensified treatment arm versus a standard treatment arm (as used in the EURO-LB 02) Patients are stratified into 3 different risk groups according to CNS status, immunophenotype, genetic markers and stage of disease at diagnosis: high risk group (HR), standard risk group I/II (SR I/II) and standard risk group (SR). Patients in the risk groups SR I/II and SR are randomized (R1) in two arms after a cytoreductive prephase with prednisone. Patients in standard arm receive the standard induction phase with prednisone. Patients in the experimental arm receive an induction phase with dexamethasone instead of prednisone. In SR group, induction phase is followed by the consolidation phase, the non-HR extra-compartment phase with HD-MTX (high-dose methotrexate), the reintensification phase and the maintenance therapy for the total therapy duration of 24 months. In SR I/II group, patients receive no reintensification phase. The Induction phase is followed by the consolidation phase, the non-HR extra-compartment phase and the maintenance therapy for the total therapy duration of 24 months. Patients in the HR group are eligible for randomization (R1) as outlined above. In addition high risk patients are eligible for second randomization (R2) at the end of induction phase. In the standard arm, HR-patients receive the consolidation phase and the non-HR extra-compartment phase. In the experimental arm, HR-patients receive a consolidation phase including two additional doses of PEG asparaginase and the HR-intensified extra-compartment phase consisting of two high risk courses alternating with two HD-MTX courses. Either phase is followed by the reintensification phase and the maintenance therapy for the total therapy duration of 24 months. Patients with involvement of the CNS (CNS positive) are stratified to the high risk group (HR) and are eligible for both randomizations (R1 and R2). Additionally, patients with CNS involvement (CNS positive) receive intensified intrathecal therapy. Intrathecal therapy consists of TIT (triple intrathecal therapy) after diagnosis of CNS involvement. TIT is administered twice weekly until clearance of blasts in the cerebrospinal fluid is achieved. Further intrathecal therapy is provided at the same points of time as for patients without CNS involvement, but TIT instead of MTX IT. In addition, patients receive four additional doses of TIT during maintenance. Cranial irradiation is omitted for patients with CNS involvement.

A Study of Baricitinib in Participants From 1 Year to Less Than 18 Years Old With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

German Cardiac Arrest Registry

Coping With Covid-19: Loneliness, Self-Efficacy, Social Support, Depression & Anxiety in Patients in Medical Rehab.

Background: Increased depressive symptoms and anxiety symptoms have been observed in about 23% of all post-COVID patients, also called post-COVID depression (Huang et al., 2021). However, what a) promotes post-COVID depression after the disease and whether it is b) even post-Covid specific has not yet been conclusively understood and will be investigated in this proposed research. The theoretical basis of the proposed work is Cacioppo, Peplau, and Perlman's theory of loneliness, Bandura's self-efficacy theory, and Schwarzer's HAPA model. Objectives: The aim of the study is to investigate possible predictors and factors that may be associated with the development and maintenance of mental and physical health constrains including depression and anxiety symptomatology as well as loneliness in hospitalized post-COVID patients and non-COVID patients in Germany. Furthermore, it will be investigated whether psychological interventions have an effect on anxiety and depression symptomatology, on loneliness values, self-efficacy and perceived social support values. Specifically, the research aim is to examine the relationships between loneliness, self-efficacy, and social support and to address the question of what factors increase the risk of post covid depression/anxiety, and to test the buffering effect of physical and social activities. For this purpose, a correlational study and an experimental group comparison will be applied, in which two interventions will be performed on post-COVID patients and non-COVID patients. These two data collections will serve as the basis for a later longitudinal study, which is still in the planning stage, as follow-up questions still need to be elaborated. Methods: Around 300 patients should be included in the study. The correlation study at the first measurement point also includes a regression analysis (moderated mediation analysis). Furthermore, an experimental group comparison is performed. For the first group, a psychological intervention for psychoeducational measures and psychosocial support, was designed according to the recommendations of the DGP - Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin e.V. for the rehabilitation of COVID-19 patients (DGP, 2020). The second intervention was designed after Cacioppo's intervention EASE, for processing loneliness. In this experiment, the psychological interventions will be applied to both groups of patients (non-Covid/Covid patients). The interventions start approximately two days after data collection at T0. The second measurement time point (T1) is scheduled at the time of patient discharge after the interventions have been implemented. Only patients who scored 8 or higher on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at admission will participate in the interventions. Patients will be asked to complete the questionnaire again six months after discharge to include a third measurement point and to conduct the aforementioned longitudinal study. Patients who refuse to participate in one of the interventions but nevertheless agree to complete the questionnaires at the measurement time points are treated according to the standards of the complex treatment in early rehabilitation in which a twice psychological contact and screening by means of HADS is obligatory. They form a third group. The following instruments will be used: Items from the UCLA Loneliness Scale (Russel, 1980, German version), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Snaith & Zigmond, 2010), Perceived Social Support Questionnaire (F-SozU K-6, Fydrich et al., 2009); SWE - General Self-Efficacy Expectancy Scale (Schwarzer et al., 1999); various self-efficacy instruments, such as staging and Activities Against Loneliness (Lippke, 2007, adapted from Godin & Shepard, 1985). It is expected that self-efficacy and social support play a role as mediator variables and moderator variables and that the symptomatology of depression and anxiety improves after an intervention in COVID and non-COVID patients alike. The findings of this research will contribute to a better understanding of the experience and behavior of patients with and without an infection with COVID-19 in early rehabilitation and identify opportunities for psychological intervention. The ethics committee of Jacobs University Bremen, where Prof. Dr. Lippke supervises the PhD project, has already approved the research project. Therefore, the project is already in the recruitment phase in order to be able to use data from the third wave from the first quarter of 2021, as this is a special situation in the pandemic and the data would not be reproducible in this way.

Comparative Head Lice Therapy With Dimet 5® vs. Hedrin® Once

Post-resection/Ablation Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (FIRE-9 - PORT / AIO-KRK-0418)

The trial will consist of both a clinical and translational part. During the study, re-assessments (radiologic assessment, blood and QoL) will be conducted for all trial subject of the trial every 3 months. Tumor biopsies will be collected at screening (baseline sample) and in case of relapse of disease if a new tumor sample is obtained. The objective of the re-assessments is detection of relapse either radiologically or within the translational material (blood samples with ctDNA dynamics and tumor - if available from relapses). CT scans of thorax/abdomen and/or MRI scans will be performed every 3 months within the 2 years after randomization. After the first two relapse-free years, intervals should be stretched to 6 months in the third and following years after study start. Structured follow-up for up to 60 months after randomization should be maintained for both arms. Patients in Arm A receive additive study drug intervention (mFOLFOXIRI or mFOLFOX-6) for up to six months (12 cycles) after randomization with additional clinical and safety assessments.

Valved Graft PMCF Study

Annuloplasty Rings and Band Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up Study

The ARB-PMCF Study has a prospective, multicenter, observational, parallel group design in which up to 550 subjects will be followed through five years from implant of an Abbott annuloplasty device, with or without concomitant procedures, in five treatment groups, including primary mitral disease repair (N=200) with the Rigid Saddle Ring, Séguin Ring or full Tailor Ring without cut zone removal; secondary mitral disease repair (N=200) with the Rigid Saddle Ring, Séguin Ring or full Tailor Ring; primary tricuspid disease repair with the full Tailor Ring (N=50); secondary tricuspid disease repair with the full Tailor Ring (N=50); and primary tricuspid disease repair with the Tailor Band or partial Tailor Ring with cut zone removed (N=50). Study enrollment will occur at up to 25 global centers with approximately half or more of all implanted subjects being from European sites. The study will enroll adult subjects expected to be implanted with an Abbott annuloplasty device within 90 days who meet all other eligibility requirements. Participants will complete annual in-clinic or telephone follow-up visits through five years from their annuloplasty implant. Data collected will include adverse events, cardiac medication usage, New York Heart Association functional classification (a measure of the severity of heart failure symptoms) and echocardiographic assessments of regurgitation through the repaired valve.