Rionero In Vulture Potenza, Italy

Cisplatin (CIS) Administered As Dry Powder for Inhalation (DPI) in Patients with Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The survival of patients with metastatic lung cancer has significantly improved with platinum-based treatments and, more recently, with targeted therapies and immunotherapies. However, despite therapeutic advances, lung cancer remains the world's leading cause of cancer-related death (approximately 2 million per year), due to innate or acquired tumour resistance to treatments. The combination of chemotherapy (platinum-doublets) and immunotherapy (immune checkpoint inhibitors) shows promising results in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment of first-line stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, leading to such combinations becoming a real backbone of the Standard of Care (SoC) for NSCLC patients. These results may be attributable to the immunogenic effects of chemotherapy-induced tumour cell death, which, when used with immune checkpoint inhibitors, is an approach that may improve the clinical outcomes of cancer patients. However, conventional chemotherapy's severe systemic toxicities represent a limiting factor in terms of administered dose and frequency, requiring long rest phases (i.e., interruption of treatment) leading to a relatively limited frequency of chemotherapy treatment in current clinical practice (4 to 6 cycles of intravenous (iv) administration, all separated by a 3-week interruption period). This limitation, associated with high mortality, especially in the advanced stages of lung cancer, demonstrates that the treatments/combinations currently used are far from optimal. Administration of cisplatin by inhalation (pulmonary route) is a promising additional approach that may overcome the limitations of conventional chemotherapy and increase the efficacy of the current SoC via sustained local attack on the lung tumours of patients treated using immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without iv chemotherapy. Use of a dry powder inhaler (DPI) enables a high therapeutic response by delivering high local concentrations of a well-established active substance without the usual undesired reactions that limit the use of high doses when administered through the conventional systemic route. Thanks to limited systemic exposure to the cytotoxic active ingredient with the use of a dry powder inhaler, such add-on treatment enables considering 5 times weekly administration of inhaled chemotherapy at the patient's home. Increasing the frequency of local chemotherapy treatment in this way may enhance activation of the systemic anti-tumour immune response via local activation and stimulation of tumour-specific antigen release as a result of a safe, sustained and prolonged local effect, compared to the peak/short effect of iv chemotherapy. This study may provide insights into whether this add-on treatment might be a safe option for NSCLC patients.

A Study of Adagrasib Plus Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Placebo Plus Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Participants With Previously Untreated Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With KRAS G12C Mutation (KRYSTAL-4)

Fibromyalgia and Small Fiber Neuropathy

Small fiber neuropathy has been observed in a large proportion of fibromyalgia patients. However, the pathophysiological role of these neurological abnormalities in determining the pain and other symptoms of fibromyalgia, and the specificity of these abnormalities, are not well understood. The primary objective of this study will be to assess the proportion of fibromyalgia patients with diffuse small-fiber neuropathy (i.e. in the upper and lower limbs) and compare this proportion to patients with other chronic pains (nociplastic, nociceptive) and with healthy controls. Our analysis will be based on the demonstration of structural abnormalities of small nerve fibers by means of skin biopsy, but also of functional abnormalities using four validated tests commonly used in this field: quantitative sensory testing (QST), laser evoked potential recordings, Sudoscan and confocal corneal microscopy. It will thus be possible to verify whether or not patients with small fiber neuropathy have a particular clinical profile in terms of pain, physical activity, comorbidities or pain impact.

Real-life Pharmacological Monitoring of Encorafenib-Binimetinib in the Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma

Our study focuses on adult patients with BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma treated with encorafenib and binimetinib, or encorafenib alone (regardless of treatment line). Encorafenib and binimetinib are BRAF and MEK inhibitors, respectively. They constitute a combination of oral targeted therapies, with marketing authorization since 2018 in metastatic melanoma in patients with BRAFV600-mutated melanoma, in first-line treatment or after progression on immunotherapy. It is taken orally, at an initial dose of : - 450 mg (six 75 mg capsules) once daily for encorafenib ; - 45 mg (3 x 15 mg tablets) twice daily, 12 hours apart, for a total daily dose of 90 mg. 5 recruiting centers (APHP): Hôpital Ambroise Paré (Boulogne-Billancourt), Hôpital Avicenne (Bobigny), Hôpital Cochin (Paris 14), Hôpital Henri Mondor (Créteil) and Hôpital Bichat (Paris 18). For the purposes of this research, subjects will be identified as follows: center no. (3 numeric positions) - person selection order no. in center (4 numeric positions) - initial surname - initial first name This reference is unique and will be kept for the duration of the research. Patients will be recruited from the dermatology departments of 5 recruiting centers.The investigator, a dermatologist, will inform the patient at the time of his or her usual follow-up in the context of melanoma care. Notice of participation in the research will be collected and transcribed into the patient's medical record. The present protocol does not interfere with patients' medical management of their melanoma-related pathology. Eligible patients will be invited to take part in the study by the investigating physician during a follow-up visit in HDJ or a specific follow-up consultation for their melanoma. During the visit, the investigating physician will inform eligible patients about the study and answer any questions they may have about its purpose, constraints, foreseeable risks and expected benefits. After reading the information letter and taking some time to think about it, the doctor will obtain the patient's opinion from and an additional 20 ml blood sample will be taken. Temporality : - Determination of plasma concentrations of immune checkpoint inhibitor antibodies: D0 and M1 if treated with checkpoint inhibitors within the last 6 months (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, ipilimumab). - Measurement of encorafenib-binimetinib plasma concentrations: M1, M2, M4 or M1, M3 of combotherapy initiation, depending on the center, then after 6 months of treatment every 2 to 3 months and at the time of progression (if not on the day of a re-evaluation HDJ when sampling is already planned) or of a severe toxic episode for which the patient consults, for 1 year. NB: The patient can be sampled at any time between two doses. Encorafenib must be taken in the evening (to avoid skipping doses on the morning of sampling). - Essential information on the sampling sheet: dose, date and time of last dose for each drug, date and time of sampling. - Detection of circulating tumor DNA: D0, M1, M2 then every 2 or 3 months for 1 year, only if performed as part of routine care Sampling and transport methods: - Determination of checkpoint inhibitor antibody concentrations: 1 x 5ml tube sent to UF Biologie du Médicament-Toxicologie at Cochin for all centers except Bichat (sent to Saint Louis) - Determination of encorafenib-binimetinib concentrations : - for patients at Ambroise-Paré hospital: 1 x 5 ml tube sent to the pharmacology laboratory at Raymond Poincaré hospital (Pr JC Alvarez) - for patients at Hôpital Bichat: 1 x 5 ml tube sent to the pharmacology laboratory at Hôpital Saint Louis. - for patients from the 3 other centers: 1 x 5 ml tube sent to the UF Biologie du Médicament-Toxicologie at Hôpital Cochin. - Detection of circulating tumor DNA (only if performed as part of routine care) : - for patients at Ambroise-Paré Hospital: 1 x 10-ml EDTA tube sent to Pr Jean-François Emile in molecular biology at Ambroise-Paré Hospital - for patients at Avicenne Hospital: 1 x 10 ml EDTA tube sent to Pr Schischmanoff and Dr Fabre in molecular biology at Avicenne Hospital - for patients at Hôpital Bichat: 1 x 10 ml EDTA tube sent to Pr ANNE COUVELARD in molecular biology at Hôpital Bichat. - for patients from the 2 other centers (Hôpital Cochin and Hôpital Mondor): 1 x 5 ml cell-free DNA tube sent to the anatomopathology and molecular biology laboratory at Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou. Essential information on the sampling sheet: dose, date and time of last dose for each drug, date and time of sampling. Dosage methods : - Determination of plasma drug concentrations by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) - Detection of circulating tumor DNA (BRAFV600 allele) in peripheral blood by digital droplet PCR (15) Dosing centers : - Pharmacology laboratories (drug dosage) : - Hôpital Cochin and Hôpital Saint Louis: encorafenib, binimetinib, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, ipilimumab - Raymond Poincaré Hospital: encorafenib, binimetinib - Pathology and molecular biology laboratories (detection of circulating tumor DNA): - Ambroise Paré Hospital - Georges Pompidou European Hospital - Bichat Hospital Tubes transferred by sorting centers according to standard procedure. Bayesian estimation of residual concentrations (Cmin ) and total exposure (AUC) between two intakes using a KP/POP model. To this end, the investigators will build two population pharmacokinetic models to explore the factors of variability in the pharmacokinetics of encorafenib and binimetinib. Based on these models, residual concentrations of each molecule will be estimated to explore the PK/PD relationship of encorafenib and binimetinib. The methodology used to build the models will be based on recommendations in the literature (16) At the end of the research, the samples will be destroyed. Follow-up of the population will follow the rhythm of visits scheduled as part of the usual care of patients with melanoma undergoing targeted therapy. the investigators plan a sampling period of 1 year, and a clinical follow-up period of 2 years for each patient from inclusion. Finally, the investigators plan a 1-year period for data analysis and article writing Clinical and biological data are collected at each visit for 2 years. An additional 20-ml blood sample (3 tubes with EDTA) is taken in the first year. Sampling and transport procedures are identical to those for the inclusion visit. Non-interventional research involving the human body poses no risk to patients. Adverse reactions observed in patients taking part in research are reported by investigators in accordance with local vigilance plans set up as part of their care activities. The data corresponding to the various clinical and biological examinations will be completed by Dr Sarah Bouchereau in the RedCap database from the medical record and the analysis results retrieved from the laboratories. Questionnaire data will be entered directly into the RedCap database by Dr Bouchereau. Patient anonymity will be ensured, in accordance with the AP-HP promoter's procedure, by a reference in the form of a center code (3 digits), a center inclusion number (4 digits) and the initials (one letter for the surname and one letter for the first name) of the person taking part in the research on all documents required for the research. Access to e-CRF via the Internet will be secured by a username and password, and data flow will be encrypted using the https protocol. Clinical data from each center will be collected in order to gather the following data from medical records (CRH, CR de consultation) sent to Pr Elisa Funck-Brentano, Dr Sarah Bouchereau and Benoit Blanchet. The data will be recorded by each investigator in the patient's file during the usual follow-up consultations. Sarah Bouchereau, Elisa Funck-Brentano and Benoit Blanchet, who will have been notified of each letter (via ORBIS, mssanté secure messaging system), will then transfer these data, which will be considered as source data, directly into the RED Cap anonymized e-CRFs. Self-questionnaires completed by patients will be kept in the study binder. In accordance with GCP : - the sponsor is responsible for obtaining the agreement of all parties involved in the research to guarantee direct access to all research sites, source data, source documents and reports for quality control and audit purposes by the sponsor, - investigators will make available to those responsible for monitoring and quality control, in the event of an audit of research involving the human person, the documents and individual data strictly necessary for this control, in accordance with the legislative and regulatory provisions in force Source documents, defined as any original document or object that can be used to prove the existence or accuracy of data or facts recorded during the course of research, will be kept for 15 years by the investigator, or by the hospital in the case of hospital medical records. Those responsible for quality control in research involving the human body (article L.1121-3 of the French Public Health Code), will take all necessary precautions to ensure the confidentiality of information relating to the research, to the persons involved, and in particular to their identity, and to the results obtained. These people, like the investigators themselves, are bound by professional secrecy. During and at the end of research involving the human person, data collected on subjects and transmitted to the sponsor by the investigators (or any other specialist) will be rendered non-identifying. Under no circumstances may the names or addresses of the persons concerned appear in plain text. Only the initials of the surname and first name will be recorded, together with a coded number specific to the research indicating the order of inclusion of subjects. The sponsor will ensure that each person taking part in the research has given his or her consent for access to individual data concerning him or her and strictly necessary for the quality control of the research. Identification of the person in charge and the location of data entry and processing management Sarah Bouchereau will enter the non-identifying data of all patients on a CRF-type paper medium, then transfer it to an Excel-type digital data collection table. Statistical analysis will be carried out by the investigating team. Based on data from the Columbus Phase 3 trial (14)the rate of discontinuation due to toxicity was 6% in the (encorafenib/binimetinib) arm, and 48% of patients had their dose reduced. Given that DLT (treatment discontinuation or dose reduction) is our primary endpoint, the investigators considered a frequency of DLT occurrence of 50% in our study. Furthermore, the investigators hypothesize that the 25% of patients with the highest encorafenib exposure (quartile 4, Q4) will more frequently present with DLT than patients with plasma exposures within Q1-Q3 (80% vs. 40%, respectively). Thus, with a two-sided α-risk of 5% and power of 80%, 59 patients will need to be included in the study to confirm our hypothesis. the investigators therefore plan to include 66 patients in order to take into account 10% of potential los de vus. Population analyzed: all patients meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria will be analyzed Rules for handling missing data: missing data will not be taken into account. Definitions : - Dose-limiting toxicity: occurrence of toxicity requiring discontinuation of encorafenib and/or binimetinib AND/OR reduction in dose by one dose level within the first 6 months of treatment . - Progression-free survival (PFS) will be calculated from the date of D1 of encorafenib/binimetinib to the date of diagnosis of progression (according to RECIST criteria) 16 or the date of last news if the date of progression is unknown . - Overall survival (OS) will be calculated from the date of D1 of encorafenib/binimetinib until the date of death or the date of last news if the date of death is not known. General statistical approach for exposure-response analysis : - Descriptive study of primary endpoints - Group comparison (Q1-3 vs Q4) with Chi2 or Fisher test for qualitative variables and Wilcoxon test for quantitative values. - Logistic regression for factors predictive (including AUC and Cmin for each molecule) of the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity. Factors associated with the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity with a p-value < 0.1 in univariate analysis will be included in a multivariate model. - Cox model for prognostic factors (including mean AUC and Cmin over the first 3 months for each molecule) for PFS and OS. Factors associated with progression or death with a p-value < 0.1 in univariate analysis will be included in a multivariate model. The aim is to have no missing data for the main evaluation criterion. For other variables, missing data may be determined by imputation if their proportion does not exceed 10%. Data quality control for statistical analyses consists in checking that the data in the observation books are complete, consistent and plausible. In the event of an anomaly, the investigator will be asked to correct it. If a verification is necessary in a source document, it can only be carried out by a member of the medical team supervising the subject. The information notes, including the record of non-opposition, will be kept by the head of the medical team supervising the subjects for a period of 15 years. Only the initials of the surname and first name will be recorded, along with a coded number specific to the search. The sponsor will ensure that each person taking part in the research has not objected to access to individual data concerning him or her and strictly necessary for the quality control of the research. In accordance with article L1121-1-1 of the French Public Health Code, no non-interventional research may be carried out on a person who has objected to it after having been provided with the information required under article L11222-1 of the same code. The patient is allowed a 15-day cooling-off period, no later than the day before the inclusion visit, between the time he or she is informed and the time the investigator signs the no-objection form. The information note is given at the screening visit. In urgent cases, when the introduction of encorafenib and binimetinib treatment cannot be delayed, this delay can be reduced to 2 hours in order to be able to include the patient. This study should in no way delay treatment. Patient information will be provided orally by the dermatologist investigator during follow-up visits for metastatic melanoma, who will give the patient an information document. The patient's information and non-opposition will be documented in the patient's medical record. A copy of the information document is given to the person prior to participation in the research. The information given to the subject will be recorded in his or her medical file. The non-opposition of the subject will be recorded in his medical file by the investigator or the qualified person who collects it.

IMC-F106C Regimen Versus Nivolumab Regimens in Previously Untreated Advanced Melanoma (PRISM-MEL-301)

Randomised Study Evaluating the Interest of Psychological Support of Patients Waiting for Hallux Valgus Surgery

Viral Infection of HSPC Impacts Hematopoiesis

Virus-induced immunosuppression is the transient or persistent decline of immune cell counts and/or function caused by a virus, favouring its persistence in the host organisms. When sustained, triggered by acute viral replication or maintained by chronic viral infections, virus-induced immunosuppression is a life-threatening condition. It is notoriously observed in chronic HIV-1 infection and even in a considerable fraction of antiretroviral-treated HIV-infected individuals. It is also observed in some individuals recovering from severe and mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Its mechanisms are elusive and efficient therapeutic options are not available. Virus-induced immunosuppression may occur in the periphery (affecting circulating immune cells) or in the bone marrow, affecting hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) and hematopoiesis. Several viruses can infect HSPCs. HIV-1 can directly infect HSC, negatively impacting HSC function and the whole stem cell environment of the bone marrow. Whether HSC can be productively infected by SARS-CoV-2 or just targeted and modulated by it remains uncertain and further studies are required to determine HSPC susceptibility or viral sensing for SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, we will i) Evaluate which hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) are targeted by HIV-1 (in vivo and ex vivo) and SARS-CoV-2 (ex vivo); ii) Evaluate whether these infected HSPC would modulate the bone marrow environment by upregulating inflammatory cytokines detrimental to lymphopoiesis.

Reason for Prescribing Rice Infant Formula

The main purpose of this study is to describe the pattern of RIF consumption in real life conditions, whatever the reasons of initiation and the chosen formula. The main objective is to study the reasons for prescribing a RIF during the first year of life, as per the pediatrician. Consumption started before 6 months of age, when milk and infantile formulas predominates in the baby's feeding, is of particular interest. Secondary objectives are to describe the modalities of feeding before, during and after consuming the RIF, to describe the growth of children who have consumed a RIF for at least 1 month, on the basis of anthropometric data collected during the first year of life. As a second intention, this study also aims to monitor the evolution of child's digestive and allergic symptoms, if any, and the sociodemographic characteristics of the infant's family.

The Role of Peripheral Afferents in Modulating Post-stroke Central Pain

The primary endpoint will be the change in neuropathic pain intensity (assessed on an 11-point pain intensity scale), expressed as a difference in pain intensity between the value obtained before each block and that obtained 45 minutes after, corresponding to the maximum expected effect. Secondary endpoints will include exertional pain, pain quality, % relief, clinical global impression, pain assessment on a patient diary for a fortnight after each block and adverse events. Patients will be randomised to receive one of 3 study treatments (lidocaine 2%, levobupivacaine 1.25 mg/ml or placebo). The treatment protocol will involve 2 perineural blocks performed 14 days apart. Assessment will continue for up to 2 weeks after each block, i.e. up to one month after the start of treatment. An evaluation of pain will be carried out before the block and after each block, at 45 minutes and at 5 hours, and then daily by the patient on a self-evaluation booklet for the 14 days following each block. Randomisation will be centralised on a server from a list drawn up in advance by computer rogramme, balanced by blocks of variable size. Allocation between the 3 arms will be done according to a balanced 1:1:1 distribution. Treatments will be numbered from 1 to n, and allocated to patients in the chronological order of their inclusion in the trial. Patients will be randomised on the day of treatment using a centralised computerised randomisation procedure to receive one of the 3 study treatments (lidocaine 20 mg/ml levobupivacaine 1.25 mg/ml or saline). No matching by age or duration of pain is planned, as randomisation usually results in groups matched at baseline on these criteria. The treatment will be administered over two visits performed 14 days apart by a qualified anaesthetist using the peri-nervous route according to current ecommendations (see above). Only one randomisation will be performed at baseline, so that a patient on active treatment cannot receive placebo at a later date and vice versa (see figure 1). The investigators plan to randomise 10 patients per group and a total of 30 patients to achieve 90% power with a two sided α risk=0.05,. Given the estimated premature discontinuation rate, the investigators consider it necessary to include 12 patients per group for a total of 36 patients. This study opens the way to new therapeutic avenues for these patients who often fail all treatments

Evaluation by Ultrasound Imaging of Local Anesthetic Spread to the Popliteal Fossa During an Adductor Canal Block

Adductor canal block is an effective analgesic technique for major knee surgery. The PROSPECT group recommends this block in first intention for locoregional anesthesia in total knee arthroplasty. It has been shown to not be inferior to femoral nerve block in this indication. The adductor canal block targets the saphenous nerve and, through its spread in the adductor canal, the posterior branch of obturator nerve and the vastus medialis nerve. However these nerves can't fully explain this block's efficiency. It has been shown that local anesthetic can spread in the adductor canal to the tibial and fibular nerves through the adductor hiatus. However, this spread is inconstant, and no study has evaluated the frequency of this spread yet. The main objective of this study is to assess the diffusion's frequency of adductor canal block to fibular and tibial nerves through ultrasound observation at the popliteal fossa.