Hiroshima,naka-ku,motomachi,7-33, Japan

A Study of Lebrikizumab (LY3650150) in Participants 6 Months to <18 Years of Age With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

A Study to Evaluate Astegolimab in Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

TNT of SCRT+CAPOX vs SCRT+CAPOXIRI for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has the promise, which means non-operative management (NOM) enable more patients (pts) with a complete clinical response (cCR) or near-complete clinical responses (nCR) after TNT to avoid subsequent radical surgery, with potentially maintaining anorectal function and quality of life (QoL). Recently, PRODIGE-23 trial demonstrated that triplet regimen (Irinotecan, oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine) before preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) significantly improved outcomes compared with CRT. However, there has been no prospective study comparing consolidation triplet with doublet regimens following short course radiotherapy (SCRT). The aim of this randomized phase III trial is to test superiority of consolidation irinotecan, capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOXIRI) vs. capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) following SCRT as TNT in pts with LARC. Pts in both groups will be re-staged after completing TNT before radical surgery according to the Memorial Sloan Kettering Regression Schema; pts with incomplete response (iCR) will undergo total mesorectal excision (TME), cCR pts will receive NOM, and nCR pts will undergo TME or NOM by a physician discretion under the recommendation of blind assessment by the designated NOM central committee. Pts will be followed by CT, MRI, colonoscopy and liquid biopsy every 4 months for 2 years, and every 6 months thereafter up to 5 years. To detect a decrease in 3-year cumulative probability of organ preservation-adapted Disease free survival (DFS) from 75.0% to 81.7%, corresponding to a target hazard ratio of 0·70, a total of 608 pts (196 events) would achieve 70% power at a two-sided α significance level of 0.05.

Imfinzi/Imjudo uHCC Japan PMS _ Japan Post-Marketing Surveillance (PMS) Study

This investigation will be conducted to collect information of safety in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with the combination therapy of IMJUDO 25 mg, 300 mg and IMFINZI Intravenous Infusion 120 mg, 500 mg or with IMFINZI monotherapy under actual use in the post-marketing setting. The investigation will be conducted as one of the additional pharmacovigilance activities in the Japan Risk Management Plan of IMJUDO and IMFINZI in compliance with the Ministerial Ordinance on Good Post-marketing Study Practice (GPSP Ordinance) and for the purpose of application for reexamination under Article 14-4 of the Act on Securing Quality, Efficacy and Safety of Products Including Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices.

A Study of Imlunestrant Versus Standard Endocrine Therapy in Participants With Early Breast Cancer

A Real-World Study to Gain Clinical Insights Into Roche Ophthalmology Products

A Study to Evaluate Mezigdomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (MEZIVd) Versus Pomalidomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (PVd) in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Ondexxya for Intravenous Injection 200mg Drug Use Result Investigation (All Case Investigation)

This survey will be conducted to investigate the status of occurrence of the safety specifications set for "Safety specification" in patients who received Ondexxya Intravenous Injection 200 mg. In addition, this survey will be implemented to understand the followings by collecting safety and effectiveness information under actual use conditions. 1. Detection of unknown adverse drug reactions 2. Incidence of adverse drug reactions under actual use conditions of the drug 3. Factors that may affect the safety or effectiveness "Safety specification" Thrombotic events, Infusion reaction, re-bleeding

Interfant-21 Treatment Protocol for Infants Under 1 Year with KMT2A-rearranged ALL or Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia

All infants that are eligible for this study and for whom the parents/legal representatives give informed consent will be enrolled in this study. All patients will receive one cycle of blinatumomab on top of the standard treatment backbone after induction therapy. Medium risk patients, that respond well to the 1st cycle will be treated with a 2nd cycle of blinatumomab replacing one chemo course after consolidation therapy. If they do not respond well enough they will be treated according to the current treatment standard. Minimal residual disease will be used to determine the response to blinatumomab. High risk patients will be eligible for allogeneic stem cell transplantation after the first blinatumomab cycle if they are Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) negative (defined as < 0.01%). Also medium risk patients with insufficient MRD response after induction or after the 1st cycle of blinatumomab will be allocated to high risk treatment and will be eligible for allogeneic stem cell transplantation.