Kozuki, Japan
- Featured
Rollover Study to Provide Continued Treatment for Participants With B-Cell Malignancies Previously Enrolled in Studies of Parsaclisib (INCB050465)
The purpose of this study is to provide continued use of parsaclisib as monotherapy or in combination with itacitinib, ruxolitinib, or ibrutinib to participants who are currently enrolled in an Incyte-sponsored study and receiving the same treatment, who have at least stable disease, who are obtaining clinical benefit (in the opinion of the investigator) on the current study treatment, as defined by the parent Protocol, and who are unable to access parsaclisib as monotherapy or in combination with itacitinib, ruxolitinib, or ibrutinib outside a clinical study. Participants will continue on the same dose and schedule as the ones being administered in the Incyte- sponsored parent Protocol at the time of the rollover. The study will collect and assess safety information with regards to AEs.
Phase
2Span
217 weeksSponsor
Incyte CorporationSendai-Shi
Recruiting
- Featured
Study to evaluate HZN-825 in patients with Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis (dcSSc)
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, repeat-dose, multicenter trial for HZN-825, a selective antagonist of lysophosphatidic acid receptor-1 (LPAR1). Participants will be screened within 4 weeks prior to the Baseline (Day 1) Visit. Approximately 300 participants who meet the trial eligibility criteria will be randomized on Day 1 in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive HZN-825 300 mg QD, HZN-825 300 mg BID or placebo for 52 weeks. Participants will take their first dose of trial drug at the clinic and will return to the clinic for trial visits at Week 4 and every 6 weeks thereafter until Week 52. Participants who complete the Double-blind Treatment Period (Week 52) may be eligible to enter a 52-week extension trial (HZNP- HZN-825-302). Participants not entering the extension will return to the clinic for a Safety Follow-up Visit 4 weeks after the last dose of trial drug.
Phase
2Span
139 weeksSponsor
Horizon Therapeutics Ireland DACSendai-Shi
Recruiting
- Featured
Sendai-Shi
Recruiting
- Featured
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pemigatinib Versus Chemotherapy in Unresectable or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma - (FIGHT-302)
For more information, please contact Incyte Corporation at 1.855.463.3463 or visit **[www.incyteclinicaltrials.com](https://www.incyteclinicaltrials.com/)**
Phase
3Span
Sponsor
Miyagi-Ken, Miyagi
Recruiting
- Featured
A Phase 2, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pemigatinib in Participants With Previously Treated Locally Advanced/Metastatic or Surgically Unresectable Solid Tumor Malignancies Harboring Activating FGFR Mutations or Translocations (FIGHT-207)
* Interventional Study * Estimated Enrollment:170 participants * Single-Arm, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pemigatinib in Participants With Previously Treated Locally Advanced/Metastatic or Surgically Unresectable Solid Tumor Malignancies Harboring Activating FGFR Mutations or Translocations. * This study consists of 3 cohorts that will have study drug administered in parallel, Cohort A, Cohort B, and Cohort C. * There is no difference in the treatment regimen between the cohorts.
Phase
2Span
Sponsor
Sendai-Shi
Recruiting
- Featured
Miyagi-Ken, Miyagi
Recruiting
A Study of Avutometinib + Defactinib in Recurrent Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer in Japanese Patients
This is a multi-center, open label Phase 2 study designed to evaluate safety and tolerability and confirm efficacy by BICR of avutometinib in combination with defactinib in Japanese patients with molecularly profiled recurrent LGSOC.
Phase
2Span
157 weeksSponsor
Verastem, Inc.Sendai, Miyagi
Recruiting
Utility of Adjusting Chemotherapy Dose & Dosing Schedule with the SALVage Weekly Dose-dense Regimen in Patients with Poor Prognostic OVARian Cancers Based on the Tumor Unfavorable Primary Chemosensitivity and Incomplete Debulking Surgery
SALVOVAR is a pragmatic open-label multicenter randomized phase III trial (ratio 1:1) comparing the efficacy of the salvage weekly dose-dense regimen with those of the continuation of the same standard regimen as given during neo-adjuvant period. The randomization will be stratified on the main clinical prognostic factors assumed to impact the efficacy of the assessed arms and the overall survival: 1. Bevacizumab: planned administration: Yes, vs No 2. BRCA mutation: planned administration: Yes, vs No/Unknown 3. KELIMTM strate within unfavorable KELIM subgroup: very unfavorable < 0.7, vs moderately unfavorable [0.7-1.0[ The trial will be pragmatic, as it aims at confirming the superiority of the adjusted chemotherapy compared to the continuation of the standard chemotherapy in routine clinical practice, in a population of ovarian cancer patients close to the real-life clinical activity with few selection criteria.
Phase
3Span
204 weeksSponsor
ARCAGY/ GINECO GROUPSendai
Recruiting
Hypothermia Versus Normothermia After Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
Temperature control is a key neurointensive care for post-cardiac arrest patients. Although therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to be effective in the past, recent large randomized controlled trials have failed to demonstrate its efficacy. The international guidelines recommend temperature control under 37.7°C. However, the optimal temperature control, i.e., hypothermia versus normothermia, remains controversial. Additionally, randomized controlled trials that examined temperature control after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) are lacking. ECPR is a resuscitation technique using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for refractory cardiac arrest. In ECPR patients, ECMO using a heat exchanger can more rapidly achieve the targeted temperature as compared to other temperature control devices. Early cooling to achieve hypothermia after resuscitation is expected to be more effective for neuroprotection in the injured brain. Thus, the investigators hypothesized that hypothermia would be effective in ECPR patients. Furthermore, ECMO can stabilize the respiratory and circulatory status. Therefore, hypothermia, which may have side effects such as electrolyte abnormalities and arrhythmias, may be safely performed by ECMO. However, ECMO requires the administration of anticoagulants; therefore, it has the risk of hemorrhagic complications. Among patients receiving ECPR, bleeding is a common complication due to its relatively difficult procedure, considering the fact that emergent cannulation is performed under resuscitation. Additionally, CPR-related complications can also result in bleeding. These complications may be enhanced by hypothermia. Therefore, hypothermia after ECPR could contribute to a favorable outcome, but it could also cause bleeding. The SAVE-J NEUROTHERM trial is a cluster randomized trial that evaluated and compared the mortality risk, neurological outcomes, and adverse events between out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients who underwent hypothermia and normothermia after ECPR.
Phase
N/ASpan
208 weeksSponsor
Kagawa UniversitySendai, Miyagi
Recruiting
A Clinical Study of ONO-1110 in Patients With Hunner Type Interstitial Cystitis
Phase
2Span
79 weeksSponsor
Ono Pharmaceutical Co. LtdSendai, Miyagi
Recruiting