Dongan-gu, Anyang, Korea, Republic of

Optimal Target Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level for Small Vessel Occlusion Stroke

A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Vutiglabridin in Early Parkinson's Disease Patients

Comparison of Clopidogrel-based Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Warfarin As Secondary Prevention Strategy for AntiPhospholipid Syndrome-related STROKE

Anti-PD-1 Antibody Therapies of Camrelizumab in Combination With Pemetrexed and Carboplatin as First-line Treatment in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Anatomic Versus Physiologic Guidance for Complete Revascularization With DES Eluting in Patients With CAD

This is a prospective, multicenter center, open-label, randomized trial to compare QCA-guided versus FFR-guided CR strategies in patients with significant CAD who are undergoing PCI with DES. Patients with symptoms or evidence of myocardial ischemia are eligible for enrollment if there have stenotic lesions with a diameter stenosis of 50%-90% in major epicardial coronary arteries ≥ 2.25 mm in diameter by visual estimation, and CR is expected to be achievable by PCI. The detailed information for inclusion and exclusion criteria is described below in the session 4. Patients meeting inclusion criteria without any exclusion criteria will be randomized to either QCA-guided CR or FFR-guided CR group. In the QCA-guided CR group, PCI will be performed if there are lesions with diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by QCA during the index procedure (and, if necessary, planned staged procedure). In the FFR-guided CR group, FFR is measured for the target coronary lesions, and then PCI will be performed for the lesions with FFR ≤0.80. Post-PCI FFR measurement is strongly recommended. However, additional procedures are not recommended based on post-PCI FFR value because there is no consensus of the optimal cut-off value to define physiologic CR. In both QCA-guided and FFR-guided PCI groups, imaging guidance during PCI is left at the discretion of the operator. However, routine high pressure post-dilation with noncompliant balloons is recommended to achieve optimal stent expansion with minimal residual stenosis (diameter stenosis < 10% on visual estimation). Patients will be followed clinically at 1, 6, 12 months, and then upto 5 years after the index procedure

A Prospective, Multi-center Registry to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Hativ® ELectrocardiogram Monitoring on Patients with Hemodialysis

Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CMG190303 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Dyslipidemia

Evaluation of Effectiveness and Safety of Synergy XD and Synergy Megatron™ Stent

This study is a non-randomized, prospective, open-label registry to compare the effectiveness and safety of Synergy XD stent and Synergy Megatron™ Stents versus other drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with coronary artery disease.

A Study Comparing Abelacimab to Apixaban in the Treatment of Cancer-associated VTE

Cancer associated thrombosis (CAT) is a severe medical condition which is characterized by high incidence of Venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence and high risk for bleeding. The two most common treatments today are low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and direct anticoagulants (DOACs), in which each has limitations. DOACs are administered orally and are seen as a more convenient alternative though associated with bleeding risk; further, some cancer patients have difficulty swallowing or develop vomiting which leads to unpredictable pharmacodynamic effects with oral therapy. The ANT-007 study will compare treatment with abelacimab monthly administration to apixaban twice daily administration over a 6-month treatment. The study outcomes include VTE recurrence, bleeding event and treatment discontinuation at 6 months