Bataysk,rostov On Don Region, Russian Federation

Atrial Fibrillation in Relationship to Sleep Quality and Plasma Biomarkers

AFib is the most common sustained arrhythmia, associated with an increased risk of stroke, heart failure, and mortality. Despite the high prevalence, AFib may be asymptomatic and consequently subclinical. Detection of subclinical AFib is highly challenging as only a minority of the patients is diagnosed during a standard examinations with a 12 - lead ECG or a 24h ECG Holter monitoring. Documented AFib causes 15% of ischemic strokes, however approximately 25% of ischemic strokes is of an unknown etiology. It is believed that undetected subclinical AFib is responsible for these strokes. There is also evidence that asymptomatic AFib is associated with a higher incidence of strokes in comparison to symptomatic AFib. Due to the fact that the standard ECG examination is not sufficient for AFib detection, various ECG screening methods have been introduced. Intermittent short ECG recording seems to be more effective than 24-hour Holter ECG in the detection of the arrhythmia however, it is not known whether it is superior to the 7 - day ECG Holter monitoring. Plasmatic biomarkers might be of a paramount importance in the diagnostic management. Several plasmatic biomarkers were tested to find an association with AFib. Perhaps the most studied ones were the natriuretic peptides that showed to be significantly increased in patients with AFib. Similarly, high sensitivity troponins are elevated in patients with the AFib. Another marker of left atrial stretching and also of ionotropic effects is apelin. Patients with lone AFib showed a significantly decreased levels of this peptide. Conflicting results were shown in studies with inflammatory biomarkers such as high sensitivity CRP Parameters reflecting thrombogenesis were also found to be associated with the arrhythmia. Fibrinogen and fibrin D-dimer were significantly increased in paroxysmal AFib. Finally, in the last years, the circulating micro RNAs emerged as a promising biomarker of AFib, having important function in suppression of messenger RNA responsible for thrombogenesis and ionotropic functions. The weakness of the mentioned studies is, that the biomarkers were usually tested in patients with a few comorbidities. So, it is not known whether these biomarkers are specific for AFib "per se" or whether they just reflect pathophysiological mechanisms like inflammation, fibrogenesis or left atrium stretching that is also present in other cardiovascular diseases. Furthermore, the AFib cohorts were often not matched with the control groups adding more uncertainty. To clarify these questions, we designed a study where plasmatic biomarkers will be studied in high risk cohort of patients with AFib having several cardiovascular comorbidities. These patients will be subsequently matched with a control group according to the age, gender and the cardiovascular comorbidities. Similarly, as the continuum of organic changes of the heart from the left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, left atrial dilatation ending with heart failure, there is also "arrhythmology continuum" in patients with arterial hypertension to supraventricular premature contractions via paroxysmal tachycardia of fibrillation up to the permanent atrial fibrillation (AFib). A common etiopathology factor of these disorders is increased sympathetic activity, which together with the catecholamine release during the stress causes arrhythmogenic substrates due to the atrial fibrogenesis. The relation between sleep disorders and the AFib is poorly understood. Micro awakenings during the night increases sympathetic activity and the arterial blood pressure. Other possible mechanism might be the decrease of plasmatic melatonin related to aging. Sleep disorders are linked to the increased heart rate, worsening of the heart rate variability, increased metabolism and body temperature, increased beta EEG activity and activation of the hypothalamic - pituitary - adrenal axis. In patients with arterial hypertension, there is an increased occurrence of premature atrial contractions that is linked to increased risk of AF incidence.

Treatment Protocol for Children and Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia - AIEOP-BFM ALL 2017

Patients are stratified into 4 early risk groups for therapy during the consolidation phase (T/early SR, T/early non-SR, pB/early non-HR, pB/early HR) and 5 risk groups for post-consolidation therapy (T/non-HR, T/HR, pB/SR, pB/MR, pB/HR). Risk stratification is based on immunophenotypic lineage, genetics of leukemic cells and treatment response on the basis of cytomorphology and methods for detection minimal residual disease. The trial includes four randomized study questions testing experimental treatments on top of the risk-stratified standard chemotherapy backbone: Primary study questions: Randomization R-eHR: Early High-risk (early HR) pB-ALL defined by genetics and/or inadequate treatment response over the course of induction: Can the probability of event-free survival (pEFS) from time of randomization be improved by additional therapy with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib during an extended consolidation treatment phase compared with standard extended consolidation? Randomization R-HR: High-risk (HR) pB-ALL defined by genetics and/or inadequate treatment response by the end of consolidation: Can the pEFS from time of randomization be improved by a treatment concept including two cycles of post-consolidation immunotherapy with blinatumomab (15 µg/m²/d for 28 days per cycle) plus 4 doses intrathecal Methotrexate replacing two conventional highly intensive chemotherapy courses? Randomization R-MR: Intermediate risk (MR) pB-ALL defined by genetics and intermediate MRD response: Can the probability of disease-free survival (pDFS) from time of randomization be improved by additional therapy with one cycle of post-reintensification immunotherapy with blinatumomab (15 µg/m²/d for 28 days)? Randomization R-T: Early non-standard risk (early non-SR) T-ALL patients defined by treatment response over the course of induction: Can the pEFS from time of randomization be improved by the extension of the standard of care consolidation phase by 14 days with an increase of the consolidation cumulative doses of Cyclophosphamide, Cytarabine and 6-Mercaptopurine by 50%? Secondary study questions: All randomizations: Can the overall survival be improved by the treatment in the experimental arm? All randomizations: What is the incidence of treatment-related toxicities and mortality in the experimental arm compared to the standard arm? Randomization R-eHR: Can the MRD load after consolidation treatment be reduced by the additional treatment with bortezomib? Randomization R-HR: Can treatment-related life-threatening complications and mortality during the intensified consolidation phase of high-risk treatment be reduced when replacing two intensive chemotherapy courses by two cycles of immunotherapy with blinatumomab? Randomization R-HR: What is the proportion of patients with insufficient MRD response to blinatumomab as defined in the protocol as compared to the MRD response after the HR-2' block in the control arm? Randomization R-HR: Can the MRD load after the first treatment cycle (HR 2'/blinatumomab) and the second cycle (HR-3'/blinatumomab) be reduced in the experimental arm when compared with conventional intensive chemotherapy? Randomization R-MR: What is the proportion of patients with positive MRD after reintensification Protocol II who become MRD-negative over the blinatumomab cycle compared to 4 weeks of standard maintenance therapy? Randomization R-T: Can the MRD load after consolidation treatment be reduced by extension of the consolidation phase? Standard-risk patients: Is the clinical outcome comparable to that obtained for standard-risk patients in study AIEOP-BFM ALL 2009? A small subgroup of patients at very high relapse risk is eligible for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after the intensified consolidation therapy phase. Patients with T-ALL and hyperleukocytosis (>=100,000/µL) and patients with CNS involvement at diagnosis (CNS3 status) are eligible for cranial irradiation with 12 Gy if age at time of irradiation is at least 4 years.

Surgery With or Without Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in High Risk RetroPeritoneal Sarcoma

Standard arm: - Large en-bloc curative-intent surgery within 4 weeks following randomization- Experimental arm Experimental arm: - 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy starting within 2 weeks following randomization: - High grade LPS: ADM (doxorubicin) 75 mg/m2 (or the equivalent EpiADM 120 mg/m2) + ifosfamide 9 g/m3 Q3 weeks. - LMS: ADM 75 mg/m2 + DTIC (dacarbazine) 1 g/m2 Q3 weeks - re-assessment of operability - curative-intent surgery within 3-6 weeks of last cycle of chemotherapy

Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of NT 201 (Botulinum Toxin) With Placebo for the Treatment of Lower Limb Spasticity Caused by Stroke or Traumatic Brain Injury

Long-term Outcomes for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients

International Cooperative Treatment Protocol for Children and Adolescents With Lymphoblastic Lymphoma

The trial LBL 2018 is a collaborative prospective, multi-national, multi-center, randomized clinical trial for the treatment of children and adolescents with newly diagnosed lymphoblastic lymphoma. The LBL 2018 trial will be open for the qualified centers of following participating study Groups (core study cohort): AIEOP (Italy), BFM (Austria, Czech Republic, Germany, Switzerland), BSPHO (Belgium), CoALL (Germany), DCOG (The Netherlands), NOPHO (Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden), PPLLSG (Poland), SEHOP (Spain) and SFCE (France). HKPHOSG (Hong Kong), HPOG (Hungary), ISPHO (Israel), NSPHO (Moscow), SHOP (Portugal) and SPS (Slovak Republic) start patient recruitment into the extended study cohort (without randomization). Over the trial period study groups may switch from the extended study cohort to the core study cohort. Primary objectives: - Randomization R1, all patients eligible: To examine, whether the cumulative incidence of relapses with involvement of the CNS (CNS relapse, pCICR) can be decreased by a modified induction therapy including dexamethasone (experimental arm) instead of prednisone (standard arm) - Randomization R2, only patients with high risk LBL eligible: to examine, whether the probability of event-free survival (pEFS) in these patients can be improved by receiving an intensified treatment arm versus a standard treatment arm (as used in the EURO-LB 02) Patients are stratified into 3 different risk groups according to CNS status, immunophenotype, genetic markers and stage of disease at diagnosis: high risk group (HR), standard risk group I/II (SR I/II) and standard risk group (SR). Patients in the risk groups SR I/II and SR are randomized (R1) in two arms after a cytoreductive prephase with prednisone. Patients in standard arm receive the standard induction phase with prednisone. Patients in the experimental arm receive an induction phase with dexamethasone instead of prednisone. In SR group, induction phase is followed by the consolidation phase, the non-HR extra-compartment phase with HD-MTX (high-dose methotrexate), the reintensification phase and the maintenance therapy for the total therapy duration of 24 months. In SR I/II group, patients receive no reintensification phase. The Induction phase is followed by the consolidation phase, the non-HR extra-compartment phase and the maintenance therapy for the total therapy duration of 24 months. Patients in the HR group are eligible for randomization (R1) as outlined above. In addition high risk patients are eligible for second randomization (R2) at the end of induction phase. In the standard arm, HR-patients receive the consolidation phase and the non-HR extra-compartment phase. In the experimental arm, HR-patients receive a consolidation phase including two additional doses of PEG asparaginase and the HR-intensified extra-compartment phase consisting of two high risk courses alternating with two HD-MTX courses. Either phase is followed by the reintensification phase and the maintenance therapy for the total therapy duration of 24 months. Patients with involvement of the CNS (CNS positive) are stratified to the high risk group (HR) and are eligible for both randomizations (R1 and R2). Additionally, patients with CNS involvement (CNS positive) receive intensified intrathecal therapy. Intrathecal therapy consists of TIT (triple intrathecal therapy) after diagnosis of CNS involvement. TIT is administered twice weekly until clearance of blasts in the cerebrospinal fluid is achieved. Further intrathecal therapy is provided at the same points of time as for patients without CNS involvement, but TIT instead of MTX IT. In addition, patients receive four additional doses of TIT during maintenance. Cranial irradiation is omitted for patients with CNS involvement.

A Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Mirikizumab in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis (LUCENT 3)

Naloxone HCl PR Tablets in Patients With Opioid Induced Constipation

A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Adjuvant Giredestrant Compared With Physician's Choice of Adjuvant Endocrine Monotherapy in Participants With Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer (lidERA Breast Cancer)

Multigen Plus H Study and AMF TT Cones