Engels, Saratov Region, Russian Federation

A Phase III Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Baxdrostat in Combination With Dapagliflozin on CKD Progression in Participants With CKD and High Blood Pressure.

A Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Budesonide, Glycopyrronium and Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dosed Inhaler on Cardiopulmonary Outcomes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

This is a Phase III randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multi-center event-driven study comparing BGF MDI 320/14.4/9.6 μg BID with GFF MDI 14.4/9.6 μg BID in participants with COPD who are at risk of a cardiopulmonary event.

Post-marketing Clinical Trial of Elexir(Trigeminal Nerve Electrical Stimulator) for the Acute Treatment of Migraine

Written consent is obtained from the subjects before proceeding with this study. Afterwards, the selection/exclusion criteria are checked to determine whether they are suitable for participation in the study. Subjects who meet the final selection/exclusion criteria are randomly assigned and assigned to the test group or control group in a 1:1 ratio, clinical research coordinator will provide the subject with Investigational device to use at home and migraine diary, AE reporting form If migraine occurs within 8 weeks at home, the subject applies a investigational device (test device or control device) for 1 hour. A migraine diary is written after a migraine occurs and before starting a investigational device. A migraine diary is written 1 and 2 hours after the start of application of the investigational device, and acute migraine treatment medications can be taken from that point on. Then, the subject writes migraine diary again 24 hours after starting to apply the investigational device. Subjects who have applied the investigational device must visit the institution within 7 days after application and return the investigational device and the migraine headache. If a subject does not occure a migraine within an 8-week period, subject must visit the institution and return the investigational device and migraine diary.

FFR Versus IVUS with Angiography-Derived FFR for Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

1. Hypothesis: The IVUS-guided stent implantation after angiography-derived FFR-based decision-making will show superiority in terms of a lower rate of patients-oriented composite outcomes (POCO) at 24 months after randomization compared with the FFR-guided PCI strategy in patients with coronary stenosis. 2. Research materials and indication for revascularization: 2.1 Experimental group: PCI will be performed if angiography-derived FFR ≤0.80 and will be deferred if angiography-derived FFR >0.80; If PCI is performed, PCI optimization using IVUS will be performed following the recommended criteria: ① Plaque burden at stent edge ≤55%; ② Minimal stent area ≥ 5.5 mm2, or minimal stent area ≥ distal reference lumen area. 2.2 Control group: PCI will be performed if FFR ≤0.80 and will be deferred if FFR >0.80; If PCI is performed, PCI optimization using FFR will be performed following the recommended criteria: ① Post-PCI FFR ≥ 0.88, or ② Post-PCI ΔFFR ([FFR at stent distal edge] - [FFR at stent proximal edge]) < 0.05. 3. Sample size: In the post-hoc analysis of the FLAVOUR I study applying QFR analysis, the 2-year POCO rate was 13.0% in the PCI group with FFR ≤0.80 and undergoing FFR-based PCI optimization and 7.1% in the PCI group with QFR ≤0.80 and undergoing IVUS-based PCI optimization. Meanwhile, the 2-year POCO rate was 5.8% and 6.5% in the deferral of PCI group with FFR >0.80 and QFR >0.80, respectively. Assuming a PCI rate of 70% in patients with coronary artery lesions with 50-90% stenosis that is the inclusion criteria for the current study, and considering event rates from historical studies evaluating FFR- and QFR-guided PCI strategies, the cumulative incidence rate of POCO at 24 months was estimated to be 13.0% in the control group (FFR group) and 9.0% in the experimental group (QFR-IVUS group). - Primary endpoint: POCO, defined as a composite of death from any cause, MI, or any revascularization at 24 months after randomization. - Design: superiority - Sampling ratio: experimental group : control group = 1:1 - Type I error (α): One-sided 2.5% - Accrual time: 24 months - Total time: 4 years (accrual 24 months + follow-up 24 months) - Assumption: POCO 13.0% vs. 9.0% in control or experimental group, respectively - Statistical power (1- β): 90% - Primary statistical method: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank test - Estimated attrition rate: total 10% - Stratification in randomization: Presence of diabetes mellitus Based on the above assumption, we would need total 1,942 patients (971 patients in each group) with consideration of an attrition rate.

A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Vutiglabridin in Early Parkinson's Disease Patients

Visual Perceptual Learning Based Digital Therapeutics for Stereopsis in Intermittent Exotropia

A Long-Term Study of Elafibranor in Adult Participants With Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Comparison of Clopidogrel-based Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Warfarin As Secondary Prevention Strategy for AntiPhospholipid Syndrome-related STROKE

Comparison of Myocardial Infarction Patients Who Were Prescribed a Novel Antiplatelet Agent or Clopidogrel

The purpose of this study is to compare the prognosis of patients with clopidogrel after early discontinuation of ticagrelor/prasugrel with patients who maintained aspirin and ticagrelor/prasugrel as standard therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.

Efficacy and Safety of Edoxaban in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Mitral Stenosis

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are generally recommended as 1st line therapy for oral anticoagulant in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). But, the efficacy and safety of NOAC in AF patients with prosthetic mechanical heart valves or moderate to severe mitral valve stenosis have not been proven, and the guidelines recommend vitamin K antagonist (VKA) administration to those patient groups. This trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of the edoxaban and the warfarin in AF patients with moderate to severe mitral valve stenosis. Edoxaban in patients with aTrial fibrillation and MItral Stenosis (ERTEMIS) trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, investigator initiated phase 2 trial. The patients were randomly assigned to Edoxaban or Warfarin groups. The primary efficacy outcome is a composite of stroke and systemic arterial thromboembolism. The secondary efficacy outcomes are each component of the primary efficacy outcomes and death from any cause. The safety outcome was major bleeding.