Bessemer, Alabama

S1803, Lenalidomide +/- Daratumumab/rHuPh20 as Post-ASCT Maintenance for MM w/MRD to Direct Therapy Duration

Letrozole With or Without Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Treating Patients With Stage II-IV Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To examine if letrozole monotherapy/maintenance (L/L) is non-inferior to intravenous (IV) paclitaxel/carboplatin and maintenance letrozole (CT/L) with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) in women with stage II-IV primary low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum after primary surgical cytoreduction. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the nature, frequency and maximum degree of toxicity as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v) 5.0 for each treatment arm. II. To compare the relative frequency of objective tumor response in those with measurable disease after cytoreductive surgery for each treatment arm. III. To compare overall survival for each treatment arm. IV. To compare the CT/L and L/L arms with respect to patients' adherence to letrozole therapy as measured by pill counts. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive paclitaxel IV over 3 hours and carboplatin IV on day 1. Cycles repeat every 21 days for up to 6 cycles. Patients then receive letrozole orally (PO) once daily (QD) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo blood collection and tumor biopsy during screening as well as medical imaging throughout the study. ARM II: Patients receive letrozole PO QD. Cycles repeat every 21 days for up to 6 cycles. Patients then receive letrozole orally PO QD in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity as maintenance therapy. Patients undergo blood collection and tumor biopsy during screening as well as medical imaging throughout the study. After completion of study treatment/intervention, patients/participants are followed up every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months for 3 years, then annually thereafter.

Lung-MAP: A Master Screening Protocol for Previously-Treated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Primary Objective of the Master Protocol (LUNGMAP) The primary objective of this screening study is to test patient specimens to determine eligibility for participation in the biomarker-driven and non-matched sub-studies included within the Lung-MAP umbrella protocol. Secondary Objectives 1. Screening Success Rate Objective To evaluate the screen success rate defined as the percentage of screened patients that register for a therapeutic sub-study. Screen success rates will be evaluated for the total screened population and by the subset of patients screened following progression on previous therapy or pre-screened on current therapy. 2. Translational Medicine Objectives 1. To evaluate circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and compare to the FMI Foundation tissue molecular profiling results in patients who submit a new biopsy for screening. 2. To establish a tissue/blood repository. Ancillary Study S1400GEN Objectives The Lung-MAP Screening Study includes an ancillary study evaluating patient and physician attitudes regarding the return of somatic mutation findings suggestive of a germline mutation. Participation in this study is optional. 1. Primary Objective To evaluate patient attitudes and preferences about return of somatic mutation findings suggestive of a germline mutation in the Lung-MAP Screening Study. 2. Secondary Objectives 1. To evaluate Lung-MAP study physician attitudes and preferences about return of somatic mutation findings suggestive of a germline mutation in the Lung-MAP Screening Study. 2. To evaluate Lung-MAP patients' and study physicians' knowledge of cancer genomics. 3. To evaluate Lung-MAP patients' and study physicians' knowledge of the design of the Lung-MAP Screening Study. 4. To explore whether physician and patient knowledge of cancer genomics and attitudes and preferences about return of genomic profiling findings are correlated.

Standard Systemic Therapy With or Without Definitive Treatment in Treating Participants With Metastatic Prostate Cancer

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare overall survival in metastatic prostate cancer patients who are randomized to standard systemic therapy (SST) plus definitive treatment of the primary tumor versus standard systemic therapy alone. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare overall survival in metastatic prostate cancer patients who received SST plus surgical excision of the primary tumor versus SST alone in the subset who specify the surgical intent stratification factor. II. To compare the rate of symptomatic local progression between the treatment arms. III. To compare progression-free survival (PFS) between the two treatment arms. IV. To compare rates of progression-free survival between arms for the subsets of patients with and without metastasis directed therapy (MDT) to oligometastatic sites. QUALITY OF LIFE OBJECTIVES: I. To compare between arms patient-reported urinary function and urinary bother over time (after initiation of SST at 6 months, 1, 2, and 3 years) using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) and patient-reported pain and physical functioning using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) between patients receiving standard systemic therapy and those receiving systemic therapy and definitive management of the primary prostate cancer. OTHER OBJECTIVES: I. To bank tissue and whole blood specimens for future use. OUTLINE: INDUCTION: Participants receive 1 of 6 acceptable forms of SST for 22-28 weeks. I. Participants undergo a bilateral orchiectomy. II. Participants receive goserelin acetate subcutaneously (SC) every 28 days or 12 weeks, histrelin acetate SC every 12 months, leuprolide acetate SC or intramuscularly (IM) every 1, 3, 4, or 6 months, and triptorelin every 1, 3, or 6 months. III. Participants receive goserelin acetate SC every 28 days or 12 weeks, histrelin acetate SC every 12 months, leuprolide acetate SC or IM every 1, 3, 4, or 6 months, and triptorelin every 1, 3, or 6 months. Participants also receive nilutamide orally (PO) daily, flutamide PO every 8 hours, and bicalutamide PO daily. IV. Participants receive degarelix via injection for 2 doses and then every 28 days. V. Participants receive nilutamide PO daily, flutamide PO every 8 hours, and bicalutamide PO daily. Participants also receive docetaxel over 1 hour every 3 weeks with or without prednisone PO every 12 hours. VI. Participants receive nilutamide PO daily, flutamide PO every 8 hours, and bicalutamide PO daily. Participants also receive abiraterone PO daily or prednisone PO every 12 hours. After completion of 22-28 weeks of SST, participants are then randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Participants receive 1 acceptable form of SST as in Induction except for treatment with docetaxel and prednisone. ARM II: Participants receive 1 acceptable form of SST as in Induction except for treatment with docetaxel and prednisone. Participants undergo prostatectomy within 8 weeks after randomization or radiation therapy within 4 weeks of randomization. After completion of study treatment, participants are followed up for 8 years.

Bupropion to Reduce Cancer Related Fatigue in Cancer Survivors

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To determine the efficacy of bupropion hydrochloride controlled-release (bupropion) versus placebo in reducing fatigue in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial of cancer survivors with fatigue. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the efficacy of bupropion versus placebo on depression and quality of life in cancer survivors with fatigue. II. To assess the tolerability of bupropion in cancer survivors with fatigue. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the efficacy of bupropion versus placebo on symptomatology and cognition in cancer survivors with fatigue. II. To explore the effects of bupropion on putative mechanisms of cancer-related fatigue. III. To explore associations of CYP2B6 genotype with bupropion metabolism and changes in fatigue. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive bupropion hydrochloride controlled-release orally (PO) once daily (QD) for up to 13 weeks in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. ARM II: Patients receive placebo PO QD for up to 13 weeks in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.

Regional Radiotherapy in Biomarker Low-Risk Node Positive and T3N0 Breast Cancer

Women with node positive breast cancer normally will receive endocrine therapy and some may receive chemotherapy to help prevent the cancer from coming back. Many women will also receive radiotherapy to the whole breast/chest area and the surrounding lymph glands (called regional radiotherapy). No one really knows whether patients with low risk breast cancer need to receive regional radiotherapy. Some women may be getting regional radiotherapy who do not need it. These women may be exposed to the side effects of their treatment without benefit.

De-Escalation of Breast Radiation Trial for Hormone Sensitive, HER-2 Negative, Oncotype Recurrence Score Less Than or Equal to 18 Breast Cancer (DEBRA)

Breast conservation therapy for early stage breast cancer has been an important achievement of oncology practice in the last half century and breast radiotherapy (RT) has been essential in its development. Several seminal randomized clinical trials conducted in the 1980's era demonstrated that breast radiotherapy following lumpectomy yielded overall survival outcomes equivalent to mastectomy for treatment of early stage invasive breast cancer leading to the National Institute of Health (NIH) Consensus Conference statement in 1991 supporting breast conservation treatment.This established lumpectomy with RT as an alternative to mastectomy and subsequently the rate of breast conservation for eligible breast cancer patients rose steadily. Shortly thereafter, investigators recognized that the toxicity, patient burden, and geographic barriers associated with the protracted treatment course for breast RT was a potential barrier to breast conservation utilization. Numerous phase III clinical trials were conducted randomizing women post lumpectomy to RT vs. observation aimed at identifying which cases did not derive a significant RT benefit. No such subsets of breast cancer patients were consistently identified, thereby solidifying the standard that breast conservation required both lumpectomy and RT. Two meta-analyses by the Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) in 2005 and 2011 further reinforced the value of breast RT post lumpectomy by examining the relationship of local recurrence and breast cancer mortality relative to the use of breast RT post lumpectomy. In each analysis, it found for axillary node negative breast cancer patients undergoing breast conservation a small but consistent increase in breast cancer mortality when breast radiotherapy was omitted. As a result, breast RT after lumpectomy has become an established paradigm for breast conservation for early stage breast cancer and is recommended by the NCCN 2018 guidelines (as it has for nearly two decades) that are commonly used today by clinicians and health systems alike. The landscape of early stage breast cancer has changed dramatically over the past three decades since the establishment of breast conservation. Widespread screening with mammography has led to the diagnosis of smaller and earlier stage disease. All breast cancers are now routinely characterized by their hormone sensitivity based on the presence of estrogen and progesterone receptors on tumor cells within the biopsy or surgical specimen and presence of HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) which has provided an additional means of stratifying breast cancer into distinct prognostic groups. Small, node negative invasive breast cancer that is hormone sensitive (HS) and HER2-negative has a lower overall recurrence rate (local, regional, and distant) than breast cancers characterized by more adverse clinical pathologic features. However, other than in a smaller subset of women greater than 70 years old, clinical trials in this HS population still demonstrated unacceptable local recurrence risks long term after lumpectomy alone emphasizing that clinical and pathologic features are insufficient for consistently identifying when RT can safely be omitted.

Comparing Cisplatin Every Three Weeks to Cisplatin Weekly When Combined With Radiation for Patients With Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine whether radiation with cisplatin weekly is superior in terms of acute toxicity, as measured by the T-scores (TAME method), to radiation with cisplatin every 3 weeks for patients with locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). (Phase II) II. To determine whether radiation with cisplatin weekly is non-inferior to radiation with cisplatin every 3 weeks in terms of overall survival (OS) for patients with locoregionally advanced SCCHN. (Phase III) III. To determine whether radiation with cisplatin weekly is superior in terms of acute toxicity, as measured by the T-scores (TAME method), to radiation with cisplatin every 3 weeks for patients with locoregionally advanced SCCHN. (Phase III) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess and compare progression-free survival (PFS) between arms. II. To assess and compare locoregional failure and distant metastasis between arms. III. To assess acute and late toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] version 5.0). IV. To assess patient-reported outcomes quality of life (PRO/QOL), as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACT-H&N) (primary PRO), between arms. V. To assess hearing loss, as measured by audiograms and the modified TUNE grading scale between arms. VI. To assess hearing loss, as measured by speech audiometry Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant word scores and tympanometry (subject to the modified TUNE grading scale testing results; otherwise, it will be an exploratory objective). VII. To assess hearing-related QOL as measured by the Hearing Handicap Inventory-Screening (HHIA-S) (secondary PRO), between arms. VIII. To assess long-term PFS, OS, and toxicity between arms. IX. To assess 3-year restricted-mean survival time for OS and PFS between arms (if long-term update is warranted). EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE: I. To collect blood and tissue specimens for future translational science studies. For instance, to examine how germline and somatic genetic variants, such as TP53, CDKN2A, PIK3CA, PTEN, NFE2L2, and KEAP1, may influence cisplatin-related efficacy and toxicity, and to assess the effect of regular nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) use and genomic activation of PIK3CA (mutation or amplification) or loss of PTEN, the negative regulator of PI3K, on disease-free survival or overall survival. OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I (NON-OROPHARYNGEAL CANCER [OPC]/p16-NEGATIVE OPC group and p16-NEGATIVE OPC/CANCER OF UNKNOWN PRIMARY [CUP] group): Patients undergo radiation therapy over 5 fractions a week for a total of 33-35 fractions in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also receive cisplatin intravenously (IV) once every 3 weeks (Q3W) (on days 1, 22, and 43) during radiation therapy in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM II (NON-OROPHARYNGEAL CANCER [OPC]/p16-NEGATIVE OPC group and p16-NEGATIVE OPC/CANCER OF UNKNOWN PRIMARY [CUP] group): Patients undergo radiation therapy over 5 fractions a week for a total of 33-35 fractions in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also receive cisplatin IV once a week (QW) for 7 weeks during radiation therapy in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo computed tomography (CT) scan, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or position emission tomography (PET) scan throughout the study.

Testing the Addition of the Chemotherapy Drug Lomustine (Gleostine) to the Usual Treatment (Temozolomide and Radiation Therapy) for Newly Diagnosed MGMT Methylated Glioblastoma

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To determine if the regimen with the two alkylating agents temozolomide and lomustine with radiotherapy (RT) significantly prolongs overall survival (OS) versus (vs.) standard chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) with MGMT promoter methylation. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine if the regimen with the two alkylating agents temozolomide and lomustine with radiotherapy (RT) significantly prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) vs. standard chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed GBM with MGMT promoter methylation. II. To compare the two different chemotherapy regimens on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), as measured by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory - Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) in patients with newly diagnosed GBM with MGMT promoter methylation. III. To determine if the regimen with the two alkylating agents temozolomide and lomustine with radiotherapy (RT) is associated with inferior short-term change in PROs as measured by MDASI-BT vs. standard chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed GBM with MGMT promoter methylation. IV. To assess toxicity in the two different chemotherapy regimens. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the association between absolute lymphocyte counts and outcomes. II. To assess the association between CD4+ lymphocyte counts and outcomes. III. To compare the two different chemotherapy regimens in terms of long-term PROs as measured by MDASI-BT at years 1 and 2. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients undergo radiation therapy 5 days per week and receive temozolomide orally (PO) once daily (QD) for 6 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients then receive temozolomide PO QD on days 1-5 of each cycle. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) throughout the trial. ARM II: Patients undergo radiation therapy 5 days per week for 6 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also receive lomustine PO on day 1 of each cycle and temozolomide PO QD on days 2-6 of each cycle. Treatment repeats every 42 days for 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo MRI throughout the trial. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for year 1, every 4 months for year 2, and then every 6 months thereafter.

Using Biomarkers to Help Guide Safe Immunotherapy Discontinuation in Patients With Unresectable Stage IIIB-IV Melanoma, The PET-Stop Trial

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To determine the 12 month event free survival (EFS) rate following discontinuation of anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with disease control and negative fludeoxyglucose F-18 (FDG)- positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scan or biopsy for residual disease after 12 months of anti-PD-1 therapy (Arm A). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine rates of pathologic response in patients with tumor biopsies where positive hypermetabolic activity was present on FDG-PET/CT scan after 12 months of anti-PD-1 therapy (Arm B). II. To determine the overall 24 month EFS. III. To determine overall survival from start of anti-PD-1 therapy. IV. To determine percentage for patients who remain on treatment beyond 12 months because of positive FDG-PET/CT scan and positive biopsy for residual disease (or unable to obtain a biopsy). V. To determine incidence rates of treatment-related adverse events beyond 12 months from start of treatment in patients who discontinue anti-PD-1 therapy at 12 months and in patients who continue anti-PD-1 therapy beyond 12 months (Arm A versus [vs.] Arm B). EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess agreement in determining FDG-PET/CT positivity between the local site read and central review. II. To determine if metabolic response on serial FDG-PET/CT from pre-therapy to 12 months of anti-PD-1 therapy, as determined centrally by various criteria, is associated with EFS. III. To determine if metabolic response on serial FDG-PET/CT from 12 to 24 months after start of anti-PD-1 therapy, as determined centrally by various criteria, is associated with EFS. BIOMARKER OBJECTIVE: I. To bank tumor samples and peripheral blood for future biomarker studies. OUTLINE: Patients continue their standard of care anti-PD-1 therapy and are then assigned to 1 of 2 arms. STANDARD OF CARE: Treatment may consist of the following regimens: 1) nivolumab intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes every 2 weeks (Q2W) or every 4 weeks (Q4W); 2) pembrolizumab IV over 30 minutes every 3 weeks (Q3W) or every 6 weeks (Q6W); 3) nivolumab IV over 30 minutes and ipilimumab IV Q3W for 4 doses followed by nivolumab IV over 30 minutes Q2W or Q4W; or 4) pembrolizumab IV over 30 minutes and ipilimumab IV Q3W for 4 doses followed by pembrolizumab IV over 30 minutes Q3W or Q6W. Treatment continues until 52 weeks from start of standard of care anti-PD-1 therapy in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM A: Patients with a negative FDG-PET/CT scan or a positive FDG-PET/CT scan but with a negative biopsy for viable tumor discontinue the anti-PD-1 therapy and undergo active surveillance. ARM B: Patients with a positive FDG-PET/CT scan and positive biopsy for viable tumor or a positive FDG-PET/CT scan and biopsy not performed continue their standard of care anti-PD-1 therapy for 12 months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up through week 97 and then every 3 months for up to 5 years.