S1827 (MAVERICK) Testing Whether the Use of Brain Scans Alone Instead of Brain Scans Plus Preventive Brain Radiation Affects Lifespan in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To evaluate whether overall survival (OS) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) surveillance alone is not inferior to MRI surveillance combined with prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare cognitive failure free survival (CFFS) rate up to 12 months after randomization between the arms. II. To compare brain-metastasis-free survival between the arms. III. To compare OS between the arms within the subgroups of patients with limited-stage and extensive-stage disease. IV. To compare cognitive failure free survival (CFFS) rates at the assessment times between the arms. V. To compare the cumulative incidence of cognitive failure with death as a competing risk between the arms. VI. To compare the frequency and severity of toxicities between the two arms. ADDITIONAL OBJECTIVE: I. To collect blood for banking. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients undergo conventional or hippocampal avoidance PCI over 20 minutes 5 days per week for 2 weeks. Patients also undergo MRI scan at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months. ARM II: Patients undergo MRI scan at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months.
Phase
3Span
393 weeksSponsor
SWOG Cancer Research NetworkEdgewood, Kentucky
Recruiting
Sleep for Stroke Management and Recovery Trial
Sleep SMART has a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE) design. It is a multi-site, parallel-group superiority trial that compares 6 months of OSA treatment to usual care. The study includes two trials: a prevention study with an embedded recovery trial. 3062 subjects will be randomized over 5 years at 110 sites within the NINDS-funded StrokeNet clinical trials network.
Phase
N/ASpan
395 weeksSponsor
University of MichiganEdgewood, Kentucky
Recruiting
Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of OBT076 in Recurrent/Metastatic CD205+ Solid Tumors
Study OBT076-001 is an open-label, Phase I, dose escalation and expansion clinical study of OBT076 in CD205+ve recurrent and/or metastatic solid tumors that are refractory to standard treatments, or for which a standard therapy is not available or not suitable or is no longer effective. The study will consist of four parts: - Part A: Dose escalation - Part B: OBT076 single agent expansion - Part C: Sequential administration of OBT076 and balstilimab - Part D: Combination therapy with concurrent administration of OBT076 and balstilimab Parts A, B, C and D will consist mainly of 3 periods: Screening, Treatment and Follow-up periods. The treatment period with OBT076 consists of 21 days cycles. Approximately 200 patients will be enrolled across Parts A to D.
Phase
1Span
441 weeksSponsor
Oxford BioTherapeutics LtdEdgewood, Kentucky
Recruiting
Evaluation of Dosing Procedures of Chemotherapy Treatment (Carboplatin) With the Contrast Agent Iohexol
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Evaluate the success of targeting a carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) with our current approach to dosing carboplatin. II. Assess the performance of Cockcroft-Gault (CG), four-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD-4), and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) based on isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) calibrated serum creatinine in predicting measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) in patients with cancer. III. Define the relationship of mGFR and carboplatin clearance in patients with cancer. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Evaluate the divergence of estimated (e)GFR from mGFR based on patient demographic and other characteristics, thus identifying those most likely to benefit from determination of mGFR over use of eGFR. II. Determine the success rate of achieving the target carboplatin AUC in patients in whom the carboplatin dose is capped. III. Evaluate the relationship between carboplatin exposure and toxicity. IV. Assess the ability of markers other than creatinine in pre-treatment serum to better estimate kidney function in patients with cancer. OUTLINE: Patients receive iohexol intravenously (IV) over 30-60 seconds. Patients then receive standard of care carboplatin IV. Patients also undergo collection of 7-8 blood samples for analysis. After completion of study, patients are followed up for 3-4 weeks.
Phase
1Span
421 weeksSponsor
NRG OncologyEdgewood, Kentucky
Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of PT001 to Placebo and Open-label Spiriva® Respimat® in Subjects With Persistant Asthma
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Multi-Center 24-Week Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Three Doses of PT001 to Placebo and Open-label Spiriva® Respimat® in Subjects With Persistent Asthma
Phase
2/3Span
81 weeksSponsor
AstraZenecaFort Mitchell, Kentucky
Recruiting
Regional Radiotherapy in Biomarker Low-Risk Node Positive and T3N0 Breast Cancer
Women with node positive breast cancer normally will receive endocrine therapy and some may receive chemotherapy to help prevent the cancer from coming back. Many women will also receive radiotherapy to the whole breast/chest area and the surrounding lymph glands (called regional radiotherapy). No one really knows whether patients with low risk breast cancer need to receive regional radiotherapy. Some women may be getting regional radiotherapy who do not need it. These women may be exposed to the side effects of their treatment without benefit.
Phase
3Span
481 weeksSponsor
Canadian Cancer Trials GroupEdgewood, Kentucky
Recruiting
EF-36/Keynote B36: A Pilot, Randomized, Open-label Study of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields, 150 kHz) Concomitant With Pembrolizumab for First Line Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
TTFields have demonstrated significant activity in vitro and in NSCLC pre-clinical models, both as a single modality treatment and concomitant with chemotherapies and PD-1 inhibitors. TTFields have demonstrated synergistic activity when administered alongside taxanes; while TTFields used concomitantly with PD-1 inhibition have shown additive effects. In a pilot study, 42 advanced stage NSCLC patients, who had tumor progression after at least one line of prior chemotherapy, received pemetrexed together with TTFields (150 kHz) applied to the chest and upper abdomen until disease progression. The combination was well tolerated and the only device-related adverse event was mild to moderate contact dermatitis. Efficacy endpoints were remarkably high compared to historical data for pemetrexed alone. Preclinical models have been used to assess the potency of TTFields concomitant with checkpoint inhibition. In an in vivo experiment, C57Bl/6 mice had LLC-1 cells injected directly into the lungs. TTFields were applied to the mouse lungs for 7 days in parallel to I.P. injections of anti-PD-1. Concomitant TTFields and anti-PD-1 treatments led to a significant decrease in tumor volume compared to control mice and to mice treated with anti-PD-1 alone. The concomitant treatments also resulted in an increase in the percentage of tumor-infiltrating leukocytes (CD45+). Specifically, there was a significantly higher frequency of macrophages (CD45+/CD11b+/F4/80+) and dendritic cells (CD45+/CD11c+) in tumors from mice that were concomitantly treated with TTFields and anti-PD-1. Concomitant therapy upregulated PD-1 expression on macrophages and dendritic cells in mice, suggesting an adaptive immune response to control the inflammation caused by the treatment. Additionally, cytotoxic T-cells isolated from tumors treated with TTFields and anti-PD-1 demonstrated increased production of IFN-γ. Overall, these findings imply that concomitant TTFields and anti-PD-1 therapy enhanced the immune response, which led to better management of the tumor. The study will enroll 100 patients, whose tumors are classified as TPS>1% and in whom EGFR or ALK-directed therapy is not indicated, for examination of the effectiveness and safety of TTFields concomitant with pembrolizumab. In addition, all patients must meet all eligibility criteria. After a Screening Phase of up to 28 days, subjects will be enrolled to receive TTFields (150 kHz) to the thorax using the NovoTTF-200T device for an average of 18 hours a day concomitant with pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks, or pembrolizumab alone. Each subject will participate in the study for approximately 2 years from the time the subject signs the Informed Consent Form (ICF) through the final contact. Treatment with TTFields and pembrolizumab will continue for 24 months (TTFields) and until either: (1) 35 study treatments have been administered (pembrolizumab), (2) there is documented disease progression (per iRECIST criteria), (3) unacceptable adverse event(s), (4) intercurrent illness that prevents further administration of treatment, (5) investigator's decision to withdraw the subject, (6) subject withdraws consent, (7) pregnancy of the subject, (8) non-compliance with study treatment or procedure requirements, or (9) administrative/Sponsor decisions. In case of discontinuation of either of the study treatments due to reasons other than disease progression, the remaining treatment should continue until disease progression or 24 months (TTFields) / 35 cycles (pembrolizumab). If an alternative anticancer therapy is initiated, the patient will be removed from the study. Subjects who discontinue all study treatments prior to disease progression will be monitored for disease status in the Observation Phase until: (1) disease progression is confirmed by the site, (2) a non-study cancer treatment is initiated, (3) consent is withdrawn, or (4) the subject is lost to follow-up. Subjects will have post-treatment monthly follow-up by telephone for disease status until death, withdrawing consent, becoming lost to follow-up, or end of the study.
Phase
2Span
286 weeksSponsor
NovoCure GmbHEdgewood, Kentucky
Recruiting
Five or Ten Year Colonoscopy for 1-2 Non-Advanced Adenomatous Polyps
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death among men and women in the United States (US). The lifetime risk of colorectal cancer in both men and women in the US is approximately 6%. About 93% of colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnoses are in patients older than 50 years (Siegel 2014). Randomized controlled trials show that screening for CRC significantly decreases CRC incidence and mortality (Schoen 2012, Atkin 2010, Mandel 1999, Mandel 2000). CRC screening has received a Grade A recommendation from the US Preventive Services Task Force. In the U.S., colonoscopy is the most utilized screening modality for CRC. On a population basis, screening rates, which were around 40-50%, have now increased to 65%, and a goal to increase to 80% compliance is being promoted (CDC 2011, CDC 2013, Meester 2015). Adenomatous polyps are the acknowledged precursors of colorectal cancer. Identification and removal of adenomas is the mechanism by which screening is effective in reducing CRC incidence and subsequent mortality. "Advanced" adenomas are adenomas which are greater than or equal to 1 cm, or have a "villous" component (tubulovillous or villous), or have foci of high grade dysplasia. Advanced adenomas are associated with increased long-term risk of cancer, even years after colonoscopy (Click 2018). The prevalence of advanced adenomas at screening colonoscopy is 5-10% (Ferlitsch 2011, Imperiale 2014). Non-advanced adenomas are adenomas greater than 1 cm with neither villous components nor high grade dysplasia. Non-advanced adenomas are much more common than advanced adenomas, present in around 30% of colonoscopy exams (Ferlitsch 2011, Imperiale 2014). After detection of adenomas, patients are advised to return periodically for surveillance colonoscopy. Patients with 1-2 non-advanced adenomas are recommended by guidelines to return in 5 - 10 years for follow-up surveillance colonoscopy (Lieberman 2012). However, there are no guidelines on how to triage individuals to 5 as opposed to 10 years. Furthermore, there is limited evidence supporting the effectiveness of surveillance colonoscopy in reducing CRC incidence. A retrospective study in patients with advanced adenomas demonstrated benefit (Atkin 2017), but the study was not randomized and did not include patients with 1-2 non-advanced adenomas. The only randomized trial of surveillance colonoscopy was reported in the early 1990's, when participants were randomized to 3 vs. 1- and 3- year surveillance (Winawer 1993). No difference in advanced adenoma detection was observed when comparing participants examined at the two screening intervals, and as a result, guidelines were modified with participants advised to return every 3 years after adenomatous polyp detection. The recommended interval for non-advanced adenomas was gradually lengthened to the current standard, but there is no randomized, controlled data to support that interval. Furthermore, observational data of surveillance colonoscopy practice in the U.S. demonstrate that recommended intervals are often not adhered to, and individuals return for repeat testing well ahead of guideline recommendations (Schoen 2010, Lieberman 2014). Furthermore, if anything, retrospective, natural history studies of non-advanced adenomas do not support the association of non-advanced adenoma with a higher risk of subsequent colorectal cancer (Atkin 1992, Spencer 1984, Loberg 2014). For example, in a classic study from the United Kingdom, patients with small rectosigmoid adenomas, even if multiple, did not have an increased risk of CRC compared to the general population, over a 14-year mean follow-up time (Atkin 1992). In a recent observational study from Norway, participants with a low-risk adenoma followed over a median of 7.7 years (maximum 19 years) without subsequent surveillance colonoscopy, had a lower CRC mortality than the general population (Loberg 2014), implying that although the initial colonoscopy may be protective, subsequent follow-up colonoscopy was not required. More recently, several studies have reported that individuals with non-advanced adenomas do not have an increased risk of colorectal cancer compared to those with no adenomas (Click 2018, Lieberman 2019, Lee 2019). Another recent major development affecting screening is that practitioners of colonoscopy are now recommended to monitor and insure their adenoma detection rates are high. Data from Poland (Kaminski 2010) and Kaiser Permanente in California (Corley 2014) have demonstrated that a higher adenoma detection rate (ADR) is associated with a lower long-term risk of interval CRC, or cancer occurring after colonoscopy. Our understanding of these observations is premised on the notion that leaving pre-neoplastic tissue (adenomas) in situ, (such as what occurs with a lower ADR), increases the chance that an adenoma left behind will subsequently transform into cancer. The concern over interval cancers has stimulated quality concerns about the practice of colonoscopy. Guidelines for a recommended ADR at screening colonoscopy are rising, from the initial targets of 15% in women and 25% in men (Lieberman 2012) to 20% in women and 30% in men or 25% overall. ADRs in clinical studies are now commonly over 30% and some practitioners report rates exceeding 50%. However, adenomas that are detected when the ADR is high or as it increases over time are generally small, non-advanced adenomas. Current clinical practice favoring colonoscopy-based screening with increased emphasis on detection of adenomas, most of which will turn out to be small, non-advanced adenomas, will greatly increase demand for utilization of surveillance colonoscopy exams in the coming decades. Yet, the evidence for determining the benefit, optimal timing, and recommended frequency of surveillance colonoscopy is unknown. A randomized, clinical trial to demonstrate the difference in yield between 5- or 10-year surveillance for participants with non-advanced adenoma is needed to guide clinical practice. Only a randomized trial will be authoritative enough to define good clinical practice and directly influence clinical care.
Phase
N/ASpan
2282 weeksSponsor
NRG OncologyEdgewood, Kentucky
Recruiting
A Trial of Robotic Versus Open Hysterectomy Surgery in Cervix Cancer
This is a multi-center, open-label, randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial with the hypothesis that robotically assisted hysterectomy with tumor containment prior to colpotomy is non-inferior to abdominal hysterectomy with respect to disease free survival. At the commencement of surgery, a thorough inspection of all peritoneal surfaces should be performed. The location of any suspected metastatic disease should be documented in the operative report and a biopsy should be performed to confirm the diagnosis. If intraperitoneal disease is detected, the radical hysterectomy should be abandoned. In patients with macroscopic evidence of metastatic disease to the lymph nodes, intraoperative frozen section should be performed to confirm the presence of metastatic disease. Intraoperative management will be left to the discretion of the surgeon. Patients who have confirmed macroscopic lymph node metastases intraoperatively will be excluded from final analysis and replaced due to the controversy surrounding the decision to perform a radical hysterectomy in this setting. Patients in whom the hysterectomy is abandoned will be deemed non-evaluable and excluded from final analysis and will be replaced. For all patients, the surgeon should document operative time from incision to close, detailed description of operative findings, intraoperative complications, and blood loss. For patients randomized to the robotic arm, the surgeon should document the use of and specify the type of vaginal manipulator and the reason for conversion to laparotomy (if applicable). Transcervical manipulators are not permitted. Standard arm: Radical or simple hysterectomy is performed as per standard technique (peon radical hysterectomy (Piver type 2 or 3 or Querleu & Morrow Type B or C) with salpingectomy +/- oophorectomy. Ovaries may be removed or preserved +/- transposition. Prior to colpotomy, the vagina must be closed over the tumor (ie, Wertheim clamps, contour stapling device). Study arm: Radical or simple hysterectomy is performed as per standard robotic technique (Querleu & Morrow Type B or C) with salpingectomy +/- oophorectomy. Ovaries may be removed or preserved +/- transposition. Colpotomy may be made intracorporally or vaginally. Vagina must be closed prior to intracorporeal colpotomy (see below, #10)
Phase
N/ASpan
389 weeksSponsor
GOG FoundationEdgewood, Kentucky
Recruiting
Determination and Validation of a Multi-analyte Assay for Lung Cancer Screening
This is a prospective, case-control, multi-center, observational nonsignificant risk study. The study aims to collect blood and clinical data from subjects undergoing Low Dose CT (LDCT) for lung cancer screening and subjects with confirmed lung cancer.
Phase
N/ASpan
211 weeksSponsor
Nucleix Ltd.Edgewood, Kentucky
Recruiting