Two Studies for Patients With Unfavorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Testing Less Intense Treatment for Patients With a Low Gene Risk Score and Testing a More Intense Treatment for Patients With a Higher Gene Risk Score
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine whether men with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) unfavorable intermediate risk (UIR) prostate cancer and lower Decipher genomic risk (Decipher score < 0.40) treated with radiation therapy (RT) alone instead of 6 months androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) + RT experience non-inferior rate of distant metastasis. (De-intensification study) II. To determine whether men with NCCN UIR prostate cancer who are in the higher genomic risk (Decipher score >= 0.40) will have a superior metastasis-free survival through treatment intensification with darolutamide added to the standard of RT plus 6 months ADT. (Intensification study) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare overall survival (OS) between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. II. To compare time to prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. III. To compare metastasis free survival (MFS) based on conventional imaging between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and de-intensification intervention (RT alone). IV. To compare MFS based on either conventional and/or molecular imaging between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. V. To compare cumulative incidence of locoregional failure based upon conventional imaging and/ or biopsy between standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. VI. To compare cumulative incidence of distant metastasis based upon conventional imaging between standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and intensification intervention (RT plus 6 months ADT plus darolutamide). VII. To compare cumulative incidence of distant metastasis based upon either conventional and/or molecular imaging between standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. VIII. To compare prostate cancer-specific mortality between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. IX. To compare sexual and hormonal related quality of life, as measured by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC), between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. X. To compare fatigue, as measured by the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Fatigue instrument, between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. XI. To compare cognition, as measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Cognitive (FACT-Cog) perceived cognitive abilities subscale, between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare changes in cardio-metabolic markers, including body mass index, lipids, blood glucose, complete blood count (CBC), comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP), and hemoglobin (Hgb) A1c, between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. II. To compare PSA failure-free survival with non-castrate testosterone and no additional therapies between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. III. To compare cumulative incidence of locoregional failure based upon either conventional and/or molecular imaging between standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. IV. To compare castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. V. To compare bowel and urinary function related quality of life, as measured by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC), between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. VI. To compare time to testosterone recovery (defined as a T > 200ng/dL) between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. VII. To compare health utilities, as measured by the European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L), between the standard of care (RT plus 6 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT alone) or intensification (RT plus 6 months of ADT plus darolutamide) interventions. VIII. To develop and assess a machine learning/artificial intelligence algorithm for radiotherapy planning and/or quality assurance. IX. To perform future translational correlative studies using biological data, Decipher results, and clinical outcomes. OUTLINE: DE-INTENSIFICATION STUDY: Patients with Decipher score < 0.40 are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients undergo RT using a recognized regimen (2-3 days a week or 5 days a week for 2-11 weeks) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM II: Patients undergo RT as Arm I. Patients also receive ADT consisting of leuprolide, goserelin, buserelin, histrelin, triptorelin, degarelix, or relugolix at the discretion of the treating physician, for 6 months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients may also receive bicalutamide or flutamide for 0, 30 or 180 days. INTENSIFICATION STUDY: Patients with Decipher score >= 0.40 are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM III: Patients receive treatment as in Arm II. ARM IV: Patients receive RT and ADT as in Arm II. Patients also receive darolutamide orally (PO) twice daily (BID). Treatment repeats every 90 days for up to 2 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months.
Phase
3Span
809 weeksSponsor
NRG OncologyMyrtle Beach, South Carolina
Recruiting
Testing the Addition of the Drug Relugolix to the Usual Radiation Therapy for Advanced-Stage Prostate Cancer
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. Compare conventional radiological progression-free survival (rPFS) for positron emission tomography (PET)-detected, biochemically recurrent, oligometastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer patients treated with stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy (SABR) plus placebo versus (vs.) SABR plus relugolix. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Compare conventional or PET-based radiological progression-free survival (prPFS) between treatment arms. II. Compare patient-reported sexual and hormonal quality of life as assessed by corresponding Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26) domains between treatment arms. III. Compare other measures of quality of life obtained from the European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level Scale Questionnaire (EQ5D-5L), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-30), and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue instruments between the two treatment arms. IV. Compare time to salvage therapy and time to castration-resistance between treatment arms. V. Compare local progression (SABR-targeted lesion), biochemical progression, distant metastases, prostate cancer-specific mortality, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival between treatment arms. VI. Determine adverse events rates and compare rates between the two treatment arms. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE: I. Evaluate genomic and peripheral tissue and blood markers of treatment response. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive placebo orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1-180 (three tablets on Day 1, one tablet daily on Days 2-180) and undergo SABR for 1-3 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM II: Patients receive relugolix PO QD on days 1-180 (three tablets on Day 1, one tablet daily on Days 2-180) and undergo SABR for 1-3 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 3 and 6 months, every 6 months for 4 years, and then annually thereafter.
Phase
2Span
427 weeksSponsor
NRG OncologyMyrtle Beach, South Carolina
Recruiting
Financial Navigation Program to Improve Understanding and Management of Financial Aspects of Cancer Care for Patients and Their Spouses
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To determine whether a proactive financial navigation program for patients planning to receive anti-cancer treatment decreases the risk of material household financial hardship over 12 months among patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent metastatic solid tumor, or a newly diagnosed hematologic malignancy. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To examine whether proactive financial navigation improves patient quality of life. II. To examine whether proactive financial navigation decreases financial worry among patients relative to usual care and explore the extent to which financial worry correlates with financial hardship. III. To explore whether the proactive financial navigation intervention leads to decreased cost-related medication non-adherence and fewer patient emergency department (ED) visits and unplanned hospital admissions. ADDITIONAL OBJECTIVES: I. To explore the impact of proactive financial navigation on spouse/partner caregiver financial hardship, quality of life, and caregiver burden and evaluate the concordance between patient and caregiver credit data. II. To explore the utilization of financial navigation services by younger, financially fragile, and lower income patients and households and evaluate the moderator effect of age, financial fragility, and income on the impact of the proactive financial navigation intervention. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 groups. GROUP I: Patients receive financial literacy training consisting of watching online educational videos over 2-8 minutes. Patients also complete questionnaires over 30-60 minutes about education, employment, finances (assets, debt), insurance, and quality of life (financial worry) and have credit reports assessed at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months. GROUP II: Patients receive financial literacy training consisting of watching online educational videos over 2-8 minutes. Patients also meet with Consumer Education and Training Services (CENTS) counselor and Patient Advocate Foundation (PAF) case manager over approximately 1 hour every month for 6 months (with each group). Patients also complete questionnaires over 30-60 minutes about education, employment, finances (assets, debt), insurance, and quality of life (financial worry) and have credit reports assessed at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months. Spouse/partner caregiver participation is optional. If a spouse/partner caregiver is participating in the trial along with the patient. If participating, the spouse/partner caregiver receives the same intervention as the patient and will complete questionnaires and have credit reports assessed at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months. SAMPLE SIZE: Study participants include both patients and optional spouse/partner caregivers. Study enrollment targets are based entirely on patients, but the anticipated number of participants includes both groups. We expect to enroll 326 patients and approximately 196 spouse/partner caregivers for a total of 522 anticipated participants, but the study will be closed to accrual when the patient accrual target of 326 is reached, regardless of the number of participating spouse/partner caregivers.
Phase
N/ASpan
260 weeksSponsor
SWOG Cancer Research NetworkMyrtle Beach, South Carolina
Recruiting
Healthy Volunteers
Two Studies for Patients With High Risk Prostate Cancer Testing Less Intense Treatment for Patients With a Low Gene Risk Score and Testing a More Intense Treatment for Patients With a High Gene Risk Score, The PREDICT-RT Trial
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine whether men with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) high risk prostate cancer who are in the lower 2/3 of Decipher genomic risk (=< 0.85) can be treated with 12 months androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus radiation therapy (RT) instead of 24 months ADT+RT and experience non-inferior metastasis-free survival. (De-intensification study) II. To determine whether men with NCCN high risk prostate cancer who are in the upper 1/3 of Decipher genomic risk (> 0.85) or have node-positive disease by conventional imaging (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] or computed tomography [CT] scan) will have a superior metastasis-free survival (MFS) through treatment intensification with apalutamide added to the standard of RT plus 24 month ADT. (Intensification study) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare overall survival (OS) between the standard of care (RT plus 24 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification (RT plus 12 months of ADT) or intensification arm (RT plus 24 months of ADT plus apalutamide). (De-intensification and intensification studies) II. To compare time to prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure or start of salvage treatment between the standard of care (RT plus 24 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification arm (RT plus 12 months of ADT) or intensification arm (RT plus 24 months of ADT plus apalutamide). (De-intensification and intensification studies) III. To compare PSA failure-free survival with non-castrate testosterone and no additional therapies between the standard of care (RT plus 24 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification arm (RT plus 12 months of ADT) or intensification arm (RT plus 24 months of ADT plus apalutamide). (De-intensification and intensification studies) IV. To compare MFS judged based on either standard or molecular imaging between the standard of care (RT plus 24 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification arm (RT plus 12 months of ADT) or intensification arm (RT plus 24 months of ADT plus apalutamide). (De-intensification and intensification studies) V. To compare prostate cancer-specific mortality between the standard of care (RT plus 24 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification arm (RT plus 12 months of ADT) or intensification arm (RT plus 24 months of ADT plus apalutamide). (De-intensification and intensification studies) VI. To compare testosterone levels at the time of PSA failure and metastases between the standard of care (RT plus 24 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification arm (RT plus 12 months of ADT) or intensification arm (RT plus 24 months of ADT plus apalutamide). (De-intensification and intensification studies) VII. To compare time to testosterone recovery (defined as a T > 200) between the standard of care (RT plus 24 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification arm (RT plus 12 months of ADT) or intensification arm (RT plus 24 months of ADT plus apalutamide). (De-intensification and intensification studies) VIII. To compare adverse events, both clinician-reported using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v) 5.0 and patient-reported using Patient Reported Outcome (PRO)-CTCAE items, between the standard of care (RT plus 24 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification arm (RT plus 12 months of ADT) or intensification arm (RT plus 24 months of ADT plus apalutamide). (De-intensification and intensification studies) EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare changes in cardio-metabolic markers, including body mass index, and waist circumference, between the standard of care (RT plus 24 months of ADT) and either the de-intensification arm (RT plus 12 months of ADT) or intensification arm (RT plus 24 months of ADT plus apalutamide). (De-intensification and intensification studies) II. To determine a machine learning/artificial intelligence algorithm for radiotherapy quality assurance. (De-intensification and Intensification studies) III. To perform future translational correlative studies using biological and imaging data. (De-intensification and intensification studies) IV. Impact of PET use in high-risk prostate cancer PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES OBJECTIVES: PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare sexual and hormonal function related quality of life, as measured by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC), between the standard of care (RT plus 24 months of ADT) and the de-intensification arm (RT plus 12 months of ADT). (De-Intensification Study) II. To compare fatigue, as measured by the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Fatigue instrument, between the standard of care (RT plus 24 months of ADT) and the intensification arm (RT plus 24 months of ADT plus apalutamide). (Intensification Study) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare depression, as measured by the PROMIS-depression, between the standard of care (RT plus 24 months of ADT) and the de-intensification arm (RT plus 12 months of ADT). (De-Intensification Study) II. To compare depression, as measured by the PROMIS-depression, between the standard of care (RT plus 24 months of ADT) and the intensification arm (RT plus 24 months of ADT plus apalutamide). (Intensification Study) EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare cognition, as measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Cognitive (FACT-Cog) perceived cognitive abilities subscale, between the standard of care (RT plus 24 months of ADT) and the de-intensification arm (RT plus 12 months of ADT). (De-Intensification Study) II. To compare bowel and urinary function related quality of life, as measured by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC), between the standard of care (RT plus 24 months of ADT) and the de-intensification arm (RT plus 12 months of ADT). (De-Intensification Study) III. To compare fatigue, as measured by the PROMIS-Fatigue instrument, between the standard of care (RT plus 24 months of ADT) and the de-intensification arm (RT plus 12 months of ADT). (De-Intensification Study) IV. To compare sexual and hormonal function related quality of life, as measured by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC), between the standard of care (RT plus 24 months of ADT) and the intensification arm (RT plus 24 months of ADT plus apalutamide). (Intensification Study) V. To compare bowel and urinary function related quality of life, as measured by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC), between the standard of care (RT plus 24 months of ADT) and the intensification arm (RT plus 24 months of ADT plus apalutamide). (Intensification Study) VI. To compare cognition, as measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Cognitive (FACT-Cog) perceived cognitive abilities subscale, between the standard of care (RT plus 24 months of ADT) and the intensification arm (RT plus 24 months of ADT plus apalutamide). (Intensification Study) OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 arms. DE-INTENSIFICATION STUDY (DECIPHER SCORE =< 0.85): ARM I: Patients undergo radiation therapy (RT) over 2-11 weeks and receive ADT (consisting of either leuprolide, goserelin, triptorelin, degarelix, buserelin or histrelin and bicalutamide or flutamide) for 24 months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM II: Patients undergo RT over 2-11 weeks and receive ADT (consisting of either leuprolide, goserelin, triptorelin, degarelix, buserelin or histrelin and bicalutamide or flutamide) for 12 months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. INTENSIFICATION STUDY (DECIPHER SCORE > 0.85 OR NODE POSITIVE): ARM III: Patients undergo RT over 2-11 weeks and receive ADT (consisting of either leuprolide, goserelin, triptorelin, degarelix, buserelin or histrelin and bicalutamide or flutamide) for 24 months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM IV: Patients undergo RT over 2-11 weeks and receive ADT (consisting of either leuprolide, goserelin, triptorelin, degarelix, buserelin or histrelin) for 24 months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also receive apalutamide orally (PO) once daily (QD). Treatment repeats every 90 days for up to 8 cycles (24 months) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up annually.
Phase
3Span
681 weeksSponsor
NRG OncologyMyrtle Beach, South Carolina
Recruiting
Standard Systemic Therapy With or Without Definitive Treatment in Treating Participants With Metastatic Prostate Cancer
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare overall survival in metastatic prostate cancer patients who are randomized to standard systemic therapy (SST) plus definitive treatment of the primary tumor versus standard systemic therapy alone. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare overall survival in metastatic prostate cancer patients who received SST plus surgical excision of the primary tumor versus SST alone in the subset who specify the surgical intent stratification factor. II. To compare the rate of symptomatic local progression between the treatment arms. III. To compare progression-free survival (PFS) between the two treatment arms. IV. To compare rates of progression-free survival between arms for the subsets of patients with and without metastasis directed therapy (MDT) to oligometastatic sites. QUALITY OF LIFE OBJECTIVES: I. To compare between arms patient-reported urinary function and urinary bother over time (after initiation of SST at 6 months, 1, 2, and 3 years) using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) and patient-reported pain and physical functioning using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) between patients receiving standard systemic therapy and those receiving systemic therapy and definitive management of the primary prostate cancer. OTHER OBJECTIVES: I. To bank tissue and whole blood specimens for future use. OUTLINE: INDUCTION: Participants receive 1 of 6 acceptable forms of SST for 22-28 weeks. I. Participants undergo a bilateral orchiectomy. II. Participants receive goserelin acetate subcutaneously (SC) every 28 days or 12 weeks, histrelin acetate SC every 12 months, leuprolide acetate SC or intramuscularly (IM) every 1, 3, 4, or 6 months, and triptorelin every 1, 3, or 6 months. III. Participants receive goserelin acetate SC every 28 days or 12 weeks, histrelin acetate SC every 12 months, leuprolide acetate SC or IM every 1, 3, 4, or 6 months, and triptorelin every 1, 3, or 6 months. Participants also receive nilutamide orally (PO) daily, flutamide PO every 8 hours, and bicalutamide PO daily. IV. Participants receive degarelix via injection for 2 doses and then every 28 days. V. Participants receive nilutamide PO daily, flutamide PO every 8 hours, and bicalutamide PO daily. Participants also receive docetaxel over 1 hour every 3 weeks with or without prednisone PO every 12 hours. VI. Participants receive nilutamide PO daily, flutamide PO every 8 hours, and bicalutamide PO daily. Participants also receive abiraterone PO daily or prednisone PO every 12 hours. After completion of 22-28 weeks of SST, participants are then randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Participants receive 1 acceptable form of SST as in Induction except for treatment with docetaxel and prednisone. ARM II: Participants receive 1 acceptable form of SST as in Induction except for treatment with docetaxel and prednisone. Participants undergo prostatectomy within 8 weeks after randomization or radiation therapy within 4 weeks of randomization. After completion of study treatment, participants are followed up for 8 years.
Phase
3Span
680 weeksSponsor
SWOG Cancer Research NetworkMyrtle Beach, South Carolina
Recruiting
De-Escalation of Breast Radiation Trial for Hormone Sensitive, HER-2 Negative, Oncotype Recurrence Score Less Than or Equal to 18 Breast Cancer (DEBRA)
Breast conservation therapy for early stage breast cancer has been an important achievement of oncology practice in the last half century and breast radiotherapy (RT) has been essential in its development. Several seminal randomized clinical trials conducted in the 1980's era demonstrated that breast radiotherapy following lumpectomy yielded overall survival outcomes equivalent to mastectomy for treatment of early stage invasive breast cancer leading to the National Institute of Health (NIH) Consensus Conference statement in 1991 supporting breast conservation treatment.This established lumpectomy with RT as an alternative to mastectomy and subsequently the rate of breast conservation for eligible breast cancer patients rose steadily. Shortly thereafter, investigators recognized that the toxicity, patient burden, and geographic barriers associated with the protracted treatment course for breast RT was a potential barrier to breast conservation utilization. Numerous phase III clinical trials were conducted randomizing women post lumpectomy to RT vs. observation aimed at identifying which cases did not derive a significant RT benefit. No such subsets of breast cancer patients were consistently identified, thereby solidifying the standard that breast conservation required both lumpectomy and RT. Two meta-analyses by the Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) in 2005 and 2011 further reinforced the value of breast RT post lumpectomy by examining the relationship of local recurrence and breast cancer mortality relative to the use of breast RT post lumpectomy. In each analysis, it found for axillary node negative breast cancer patients undergoing breast conservation a small but consistent increase in breast cancer mortality when breast radiotherapy was omitted. As a result, breast RT after lumpectomy has become an established paradigm for breast conservation for early stage breast cancer and is recommended by the NCCN 2018 guidelines (as it has for nearly two decades) that are commonly used today by clinicians and health systems alike. The landscape of early stage breast cancer has changed dramatically over the past three decades since the establishment of breast conservation. Widespread screening with mammography has led to the diagnosis of smaller and earlier stage disease. All breast cancers are now routinely characterized by their hormone sensitivity based on the presence of estrogen and progesterone receptors on tumor cells within the biopsy or surgical specimen and presence of HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) which has provided an additional means of stratifying breast cancer into distinct prognostic groups. Small, node negative invasive breast cancer that is hormone sensitive (HS) and HER2-negative has a lower overall recurrence rate (local, regional, and distant) than breast cancers characterized by more adverse clinical pathologic features. However, other than in a smaller subset of women greater than 70 years old, clinical trials in this HS population still demonstrated unacceptable local recurrence risks long term after lumpectomy alone emphasizing that clinical and pathologic features are insufficient for consistently identifying when RT can safely be omitted.
Phase
3Span
1052 weeksSponsor
NRG OncologyMyrtle Beach, South Carolina
Recruiting