Evaluation of the Efficacy of the Injection of Botulinum Toxin A vs Scopolamine Patches in the Treatment of Drooling in Children With Cerebral Palsy

Last updated: April 27, 2022
Sponsor: Hospices Civils de Lyon
Overall Status: Active - Recruiting

Phase

3

Condition

Saliva And Salivary Gland Dysfunction

Cerebral Palsy

Treatment

N/A

Clinical Study ID

NCT03616067
69HCL18_0235
  • Ages 4-18
  • All Genders

Study Summary

Cerebral palsy is the first cause of motor disability in developed countries. It is associated with altered motor function but also with mental, sensorial and behavior deficiencies. Drooling frequently occurs in children with cerebral palsy (37 to 58%). It causes multiple medical and social complications which can all increase disability and reduce quality of life for the patients and their family. Drooling treatments are various and includes orofacial rehabilitations, anticholinergic medications, botulinum toxin A and B salivary gland injections. Surgeries could also be used, but their benefits are often outweighed by the risk.

  • Orofacial rehabilitation is firstly recommended, even if few studies evaluated its efficacy.

  • Medication by Scopoderm®, a cutaneous anticholinergic drug, is frequently used in spite of frequent side effects and a lack of evidence regarding efficacy.

  • Botulinum toxin salivary gland injections (Botox®) were shown to be effective in reducing the severity of drooling consequences for the patient quality of life up to 12 months after the injections (Reid 2008).

A recent survey carried showed that treatment by Botox® injection would be preferred by professional to Scopoderm® patch, because of better tolerance and efficacy, even if Scopoderm® remained more used by professionals (Chaleat-Valayer 2016). However, a Cochrane review (Walshe 2012) concluded that there is 1) no strong consensus regarding assessment or the timing of all treatments 2) not enough efficacy studies with high level of evidence, 3) mostly efficacy studies vs placebo or no intervention 4) a lack of long term treatment assessment 5) a lack of studies on the patient quality of life.

Our study will be a comparative randomized clinical trial with an active control arm. The hypothesis is that therapeutic treatment of drooling in children with cerebral palsy consisting of a standardized rehabilitation treatment associated with a botulinum toxin A injection (Botox®) in the salivary glands is more effective than the same rehabilitation treatment associated with a treatment by scopolamine patches (Scopoderm®).

The main outcome will be assessed 15 months after initiation of treatment to evaluate long-term effectiveness. Patients from both arms of the trial will received rehabilitation, in order to compare treatment efficacy as it is done in real conditions of treatment. The efficacy of the treatment will be assessed on the impact of the drooling perceived by the patients and their family rather than on the measure of salivary production, as recommended (Walshe 2012).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 4 to 18 years old,
  • Cerebral palsy with pathological drooling,
  • Significant impact of drooling on the children (DIS score ≥40),
  • Affiliated or beneficiary of a social security scheme,
  • At least one of the parents understanding and speaking French,
  • Written consent form signed by both parents

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous history of surgery for drooling,
  • Injection of botulinum toxin (all locations) in the 3 months prior to the inclusion,
  • Treatment by scopolamine patch (Scopoderm®) or other anticholinergic (Artane®, etc.)in the month prior to inclusion,
  • Contraindication to the anesthetic or sedation,
  • Contraindication to one of the treatments studied (glaucoma, myastenia),
  • Swallowing disorder (to saliva) or absence of spontaneous swallowing reflex notinvestigated by nasoscopy
  • On-going or programmed orthodontic treatment over the study period.
  • Untreated oro-mandibular dystonia (isolated lingual dystonia accepted)
  • Untreated bruxism
  • Untreated clinical gastro esophageal reflux
  • Untreated dental inflammatory condition (dental caries, gingivitis…)

Study Design

Total Participants: 130
Study Start date:
April 27, 2022
Estimated Completion Date:
August 31, 2025

Connect with a study center

  • CHU d'Angers

    Angers,
    France

    Active - Recruiting

  • CHU-Bordeaux

    Bordeaux,
    France

    Active - Recruiting

  • Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant - HCL

    Bron,
    France

    Active - Recruiting

  • CHU- Estaing

    Clermont-Ferrand,
    France

    Active - Recruiting

  • CHU-Grenoble

    Grenoble,
    France

    Active - Recruiting

  • Centre Médico-Chirurgical de Réadaptation des Massues

    Lyon, 69322
    France

    Active - Recruiting

  • AP-HM

    Marseille,
    France

    Active - Recruiting

  • APFESEAN Nantes

    Nantes,
    France

    Active - Recruiting

  • CHU-Nimes

    Nîmes,
    France

    Active - Recruiting

  • Centre médico- infantile

    Romagnat,
    France

    Active - Recruiting

  • Hôpitaux de Saint-Maurice

    Saint-Maurice,
    France

    Active - Recruiting

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.