Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk)

Last updated: December 2, 2024
Sponsor: Helsinn Healthcare SA
Overall Status: Completed

Phase

4

Condition

Vomiting

Effects Of Chemotherapy

Treatment

NEPA (300mg netupitant/0.5mg palonosetron)

Granisetron, 2 mg (oral) or 1 mg (IV) OR Palonosetron, 0.5 mg (oral), 0.25mg (IV) OR Ondansetron, 16 mg (oral) or 8 mg (IV) OR Dolasetron 100 mg (oral) OR Tropisetron 5 mg (oral or IV)

Dexamethasone, 8 mg (oral) or equivalent IV dose

Clinical Study ID

NCT04817189
IBA1160
  • Ages > 18
  • All Genders

Study Summary

MyRisk: Efficacy and safety evaluation of oral Akynzeo® in patients receiving MEC at high risk of developing CINV based on a prediction tool. A multinational and multicenter study.

Antiemetic guidelines recommendations are based on the emetogenic potential of the chemotherapy. Chemotherapy (CT) agents are divided in Highly, Moderately, Low and Minimally Emetogenic potential.

In addition to type of chemotherapy, several patient-related risk factors can increase the risk of CINV (chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting). Currently, there is limited consensus surrounding the most relevant patient risk factors that may predict the risk of CINV. Based on a recent study by Dranitsaris et al. (Dranitsaris et al. Ann Oncol. 2017 Jun 1; 28(6):1260-1267.), eight (8) predictive factors have been identified and an algorithm has been developed to incorporate these factors into the optimal selection of prophylactic antiemetics:

  1. nausea and/or vomiting in the prior cycle of chemotherapy

  2. use of non-prescribed antiemetics at home in the prior cycle of chemotherapy

  3. platinum or anthracycline-based chemotherapy

  4. age < 60 years

  5. expectations for (anticipating) nausea and/or vomiting

  6. <7 h of sleep the night before chemotherapy

  7. history of morning sickness during previous pregnancy

  8. cycle of chemotherapy (A negative association between risk and number of cycles was identified where the hazard for CINV was highest in cycles 1 and 2, with a gradual decline and plateau from cycle 3 onward).

The clinical application of this prediction tool has the potential to be an important resource for clinicians and may help to enhance patient care by optimizing the use of the antiemetics in a proactive manner.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients aged ≥18 years

  • Patients with a risk score of ≥ 13 as calculated by the algorithm - see 3.6.3.1.Baseline/screening: VISIT 0

  • Signed Informed consent

  • Both sexes

  • Patients with diagnosis of any cancer scheduled and intended to be treated for threeconsecutive cycles with a single dose of any IV MEC regimen, per cycle, includingadjuvant or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy

  • Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1 or 2

  • Use of Standard of Care defined as a 5-HT3 RA + Dexamethasone (or equivalentcorticosteroid) based-regimen on day 1 of chemotherapy for CINV prevention

  • Naïve and non- naïve to chemotherapy

  • The enrolled women should be a) of non-childbearing potential or b) of childbearingpotential using reliable contraceptive measures and having a negative urinepregnancy test done by health care team within 1-24 hours before dosing theantiemetic treatment in both arms and outcome recorded in the medical records

  • Able to comply with study requirements

Exclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (includinganthracycline+cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy)

  • Patients receiving oral moderately emetogenic chemotherapy drugs

  • Patients receiving opioids within 2 weeks prior to trial enrollment (longer useallowed)

  • Use of olanzapine as prophylaxis of CINV

  • Patients scheduled to receive radiotherapy concurrently with chemotherapy

  • Any illness or condition that, in the opinion of the physician, may confound theresults of the study or pose unwarranted risks in administering the investigationalproduct to the patient.

  • Patients with mechanical risk factors for nausea (i.e. intestinal obstruction)

  • Patients with liver disease (as nausea is a common presenting symptom)

  • Patients with metabolic risk factors for nausea (i.e. electrolyte imbalances causingnausea/vomiting)

  • Chronic treatment with steroids (with the exception of inhaled or topical steroids)

  • Pregnancy and/or breast-feeding women

  • Women of childbearing potential refusing to use effective contraception during thewhole study treatment and up to one month after study treatment with Akynzeo®

  • Use of Standard of Care including an NK-1 RA-based regimen to prevent CINV

Study Design

Total Participants: 414
Treatment Group(s): 3
Primary Treatment: NEPA (300mg netupitant/0.5mg palonosetron)
Phase: 4
Study Start date:
February 01, 2021
Estimated Completion Date:
July 02, 2024

Study Description

Antiemetic guideline recommendations are based on the emetogenic potential of chemotherapy and involve 4 levels of classification of intravenous chemotherapy agents, i.e., high, moderate, low and minimal; these have been accepted by major organisations. Moderate emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) results in acute vomiting in 30% to 90% of cancer patients in the absence of antiemetic therapy. In addition to the chemotherapy type, several patient-related risk factors and clinical characteristics can increase CINV risk. These can include use of antiemetics inconsistent with international guidelines, younger age, prechemotherapy nausea, no complete CINV response in an earlier cycle, history of nausea/vomiting, (trait) anxiety, fatigue experience, and expectations of nausea/vomiting. Other studies have largely confirmed some of the key risk factors for CINV (history of vomiting during pregnancy, history of motion sickness, age, gender) and added other factors such as (chronic) alcohol consumption, body surface area, fewer hours slept the night prior to infusion, or advanced stage cancer. Currently, there is a limited consensus surrounding the most relevant patient risk factors that may predict CINV risk. Based on a recent study by Dranitsaris et al. eight predictive factors have been identified, and an algorithm has been developed to combine these patient-related risk factors into the optimal treatment of prophylactic antiemetics. These include:

  1. nausea and/or vomiting in the prior cycle of chemotherapy

  2. use of non-prescribed antiemetics at home in the prior cycle of chemotherapy

  3. platinum or anthracycline-based chemotherapy

  4. age < 60 years

  5. expectations for (anticipating) nausea and/or vomiting

  6. <7 h of sleep the night before chemotherapy

  7. history of morning sickness during previous pregnancy

  8. cycle of chemotherapy (A negative association between risk and number of cycles was identified where the hazard for CINV was highest in cycles 1 and 2, with a gradual decline and plateau from cycle 3 onward).

Akynzeo®, an oral combination of the neurokinin 1 receptor antagonists (NK1 RA), netupitant and the 5-hydroxytryptamine (HT3) receptor antagonists (5-HT3 RA), palonosetron, is recommended by guidelines for the prevention of CINV. Akynzeo® has been evaluated in a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy phase II clinical trial at various dose ranges among 694 cisplatin-treated cancer patients from 44 sites (two countries); each NEPA (netupitant-palonosetron) dose significantly improves CINV prevention in cancer patients. Similar results were obtained in another international, randomised, double-blind and parallel group phase III clinical trial; NEPA prevented CINV in patients receiving MEC.

The current study primarily aimed to evaluate whether Akynzeo® leads to a higher response rate compared with standard care in MEC regimen-treated patients who are identified to be at high risk based on the algorithm.

Connect with a study center

  • Shanghai Chest Hospital

    Shanghai,
    China

    Site Not Available

  • Shanghai Ninth People´s Hospital

    Shanghai,
    China

    Site Not Available

  • Shanghai Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital

    Shanghai,
    China

    Site Not Available

  • General University Hospital in Prague

    Prague,
    Czechia

    Site Not Available

  • Thomayerova nemocnice

    Praha, 14059
    Czechia

    Site Not Available

  • Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte

    Essen,
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • IKF Frankfurt, Krankenhaus Nordwest GmbH

    Frankfurt,
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg

    Heidelberg,
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • Universitätsmedizin Mannheim

    Mannheim,
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • München Klinik Neuperlach

    München,
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • Frauenklinik St. Louise

    Paderborn,
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann gemeinnützige GmbH

    Potsdam,
    Germany

    Site Not Available

  • Sotiria General Hospital, 3rd Deúpartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

    Athens,
    Greece

    Site Not Available

  • General University Hospital of Heraklion

    Heraklion,
    Greece

    Site Not Available

  • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña

    A Coruña, 15006
    Spain

    Site Not Available

  • Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

    Barcelona, 0802
    Spain

    Site Not Available

  • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón

    Madrid, 28007
    Spain

    Site Not Available

  • Hospital Universitario de Salamanca

    Salamanca, 37007
    Spain

    Site Not Available

  • University Hospital Basel

    Basel,
    Switzerland

    Site Not Available

  • Swiss Medical Network - Clinique de Genolier

    Genolier,
    Switzerland

    Site Not Available

  • The Royal Marsden Hospital

    London,
    United Kingdom

    Site Not Available

Not the study for you?

Let us help you find the best match. Sign up as a volunteer and receive email notifications when clinical trials are posted in the medical category of interest to you.