Each year, United Kingdom (UK) hospitals admit 70,000 men and women over the age of 60
years with hip fracture. Even with surgery, 30% of patients die within a year. Among
survivors, 25% never walk again, and 22% transition from independent living to nursing
homes. This led 81 global societies to endorse a call to action to improve acute
multidisciplinary care after hip fracture.
A recent Cochrane systematic review supports rehabilitation in hospital as an effective
approach to reduce mortality after hip fracture. However, the nature of the
rehabilitation interventions varied considerably limiting conclusions on the optimal
components. This uncertainty has translated to NICE guidance being limited to daily
mobilisation and regular physiotherapy review.
The generalisability of the evidence is also limited as many rehabilitation trials
attempted to account for differences in the hip fracture population by targeting
homogenous subgroups such as patients with cognitive impairment, women, or from nursing
homes. It is therefore uncertain whether interventions deemed 'effective' are so for all
patients, or for the targeted subgroup. This in turn poses challenges as to how these
interventions may be implemented when subgroups compete for finite National Health
Service (NHS) resources.
An intervention based on stratified rehabilitation may provide answers to these
uncertainties. Stratified rehabilitation considers an entire population competing for
resources to identify subgroups of patients with different risk of poor outcomes.
Subgroups are then matched to rehabilitation tailored to their needs to optimise outcomes
across the entire population. Hip fracture survivors recently described this tailored
approach as key to successful recovery. Further, a stratified approach is regarded
central to the progress of healthcare according to the NHS and House of Lords Science and
Technology Committee. Although an approach of matching rehabilitation to patient
subgroups with different risks of poor outcomes is intuitive and effective for other
conditions, it has not been tested for rehabilitation after hip fracture.
A stratified approach to rehabilitation after hip fracture was subsequently developed.
The study has been designed in collaboration with patients and carers, healthcare
professionals working in the hospital setting, health services researchers and
statisticians. The protocol has been scientifically appraised through the funding
application process (with external peer review) and by experts in the field of
orthogeriatric rehabilitation research.
First, the investigators developed and validated a subgrouping tool 'the stratify hip
algorithm' (based on three multivariable prediction models) to identify patients at low-,
intermediate- and high-risk of death and/or change in residence (to a higher level of
care) using records for over 170,000 patients admitted to one of 173 hospitals in England
and Wales. The approach requires website entry of 5 pieces of information (age, sex,
prefracture mobility, prefracture residence, and dementia diagnosis) to generate a risk
assignment.
Next matched interventions were designed for each subgroup identified by the algorithm.
These interventions were informed by qualitative interviews with patients,
physiotherapists, and the multidisciplinary team, an umbrella review of systematic
reviews of older adults who underwent rehabilitation interventions in the acute setting,
recent systematic (including Cochrane) reviews, international guidelines, consultation
with our public and patient involvement group 'TROOP' (further detail of TROOP available
at www.ppitroop.co.uk), and an intervention development workshop and survey (following a
nominal group technique) to prioritize components with key stakeholders. The
interventions comprise self-managed exercise (low risk subgroup); education, a goal
orientated mobility programme, and enhanced discharge planning (medium risk subgroup);
and education, a goal orientated activities of daily living programme, and enhanced
assessment (high risk subgroup). Carers of participants in the medium and high risk
subgroups will be invited to take part to receive training in supporting participants
with their programmes.
The overarching purpose of a future main study is to determine the clinical- and
cost-effectiveness of adding an intervention to usual care designed to improve outcomes
of acute care for older adults after hip fracture. Several uncertainties will first be
addressed through this randomised feasibility trial.
The primary objective of this feasibility and pilot randomised trial is to determine the
treatment fidelity of the proposed intervention.
Secondary objectives seek to determine:
The acceptability of the intervention to participants, carers and therapists.
Barriers and enablers to intervention delivery.
Count of screened, eligible, approached, recruited and retained participants (and
carers).
Acceptability, completeness, and descriptive comparison of outcome data collection.
Count of inadvertent unblinding of outcome assessors.
Count of adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE).
Indicative sample size for a definitive trial.
Sixty participants will be recruited (30 per treatment arm) with assessments at baseline,
intervention end, and 12-week follow up. The intervention will start within 72 hours of
surgery and end on discharge from the acute hospital. Feasibility criteria have been
specified a priori to determine whether the trial will progress to a definitive trial.